Whitaker P
Nottingham University Medical School.
J Med Ethics. 1990 Sep;16(3):129-31. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.3.129.
The problem of resource allocation in health has stimulated much thought and research, in attempts to provide objective, rational methods by which necessary choices can be made. One such method was proposed in a paper in this journal. The authors argued for a utilitarian approach, which they claimed to demonstrate was acceptable to society at large. This paper argues that the evidence supporting such a claim was flawed; such a utilitarian approach is not socially acceptable, and is therefore not relevant. Rather more relevant directions for research are discussed, based on the assertion that a degree of realism is essential when considering the problems of resource allocation.
卫生领域的资源分配问题引发了诸多思考与研究,旨在探寻客观、合理的方法以做出必要抉择。本期刊登的一篇论文中就提出了这样一种方法。作者主张采用功利主义方法,他们声称该方法已被广大社会所接受。本文认为,支持这一说法的证据存在缺陷;这种功利主义方法在社会上并不被接受,因此也不适用。基于在考虑资源分配问题时一定程度的现实性至关重要这一论断,本文讨论了更具相关性的研究方向。