• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bioethics in developing countries: ethics of scarcity and sacrifice.发展中国家的生物伦理学:稀缺与牺牲的伦理
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):169-74. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.169.
2
Critical care: why there is no global bioethics.重症监护:为何不存在全球生物伦理学。
J Med Philos. 1998 Dec;23(6):643-51. doi: 10.1076/jmep.23.6.643.2555.
3
The foundations of bioethics: the attempt to legitimate biomedical decisions and health care policy.生物伦理学的基础:使生物医学决策和医疗保健政策合法化的尝试。
Rev Metaphys Morale. 1987 Jul-Dec;92(3):387-99.
4
Morality and contemporary culture: the President's Commission and beyond.道德与当代文化:总统委员会及其他
Cardozo Law Rev. 1984 Winter;6(2):347-55.
5
Medicine, public health, and the ethics of rationing.医学、公共卫生与资源分配伦理
Perspect Biol Med. 2002 Winter;45(1):16-30. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2002.0018.
6
Making choices: the ethical problems in determining criteria for health care rationing.做出选择:确定医疗资源分配标准中的伦理问题。
Health Care Anal. 1995 May;3(2):171-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02198227.
7
Problems in applying principles of justice to health care systems.将正义原则应用于医疗保健系统时存在的问题。
Int J Health Serv. 1977;7(4):727-31.
8
The ethics of health care rationing.医疗资源分配的伦理问题。
Public Aff Q. 1994 Jan;8(1):33-50.
9
Ethics, institutional complexity and health care reform: the struggle for normative balance.伦理、制度复杂性与医疗改革:对规范平衡的探寻
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1994 Spring;10:93-104.
10
Urban bioethics.城市生物伦理学
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2000 Mar;10(1):1-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Content development footprints for the establishment of a National Bioethics Committee: lessons from Nigeria.建立国家生物伦理委员会的内容发展足迹:来自尼日利亚的经验教训。
Glob Bioeth. 2021 Jun 11;32(1):85-99. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.1939548.
2
Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Abortion and Euthanasia Among Health Students in Papua New Guinea.巴布亚新几内亚卫生专业学生对堕胎和安乐死的认知与态度
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Dec 15;11:977-987. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S281199. eCollection 2020.
3
Ethical aspects of obstetric care: expectations and experiences of patients in South East Nigeria.产科护理的伦理方面:尼日利亚东南部患者的期望和体验。
Int J Womens Health. 2013 Sep 6;5:571-82. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S49843. eCollection 2013.
4
Can context justify an ethical double standard for clinical research in developing countries?对于发展中国家的临床研究而言,环境因素能否成为道德双重标准的正当理由?
Global Health. 2005 Jul 26;1(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-1-11.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining the best of two medical worlds: Canadian universality and United States' freedom.融合两个医学领域的精华:加拿大的全民医保体系与美国的医疗自由。
Humane Med. 1992 Oct;8(4):271-85.
2
The American Health Security Act. A single-payer proposal.《美国健康保障法案》。一项单一支付者提案。
N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20;328(20):1489-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199305203282013.
3
Quality of life in cancer care.癌症护理中的生活质量。
Med J Aust. 1993 Mar 15;158(6):429-32. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb121844.x.
4
Prices of equitable access: the new Massachusetts health insurance law.公平获取的代价:马萨诸塞州新的医疗保险法
Hastings Cent Rep. 1988 Jun-Jul;18(3):21-5.
5
Health services inequalities in Nigeria.尼日利亚的卫生服务不平等问题。
Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(11):1223-35. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90352-8.
6
Western economics and Third World health.西方经济学与第三世界卫生
Lancet. 1989 Sep 2;2(8662):551-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90665-x.
7
Resource allocation: a plea for a touch of realism.资源分配:呼吁些许现实态度。
J Med Ethics. 1990 Sep;16(3):129-31. doi: 10.1136/jme.16.3.129.
8
Shattuck Lecture--the health care industry: where is it taking us?沙塔克讲座——医疗保健行业:它将把我们带向何方?
N Engl J Med. 1991 Sep 19;325(12):854-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109193251205.
9
The Oregon Medicaid Demonstration Project--will it provide adequate medical care?俄勒冈医疗补助示范项目——它能提供足够的医疗护理吗?
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 30;326(5):340-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199201303260511.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical?成本效益分析:它合乎道德吗?
J Med Ethics. 1992 Mar;18(1):7-11. doi: 10.1136/jme.18.1.7.

发展中国家的生物伦理学:稀缺与牺牲的伦理

Bioethics in developing countries: ethics of scarcity and sacrifice.

作者信息

Olweny C

机构信息

University of Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):169-74. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.169.

DOI:10.1136/jme.20.3.169
PMID:7996563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1376503/
Abstract

Contemporary issues such as euthanasia, surrogate motherhood, organ transplantation and gene therapy, which occupy the minds of ethicists in the industrialized countries are, for the moment, irrelevant in most developing countries. There, the ethics of scarcity, sacrifice, cross-cultural research, as well as the activities of multinational companies, are germane. In this article, only the ethics of scarcity and sacrifice will be discussed. Structural adjustment programmes, designed to solve the economic problems of the developing countries, muddied the waters. The dilemma confronting practitioners in developing countries is how to adhere to the basic principles of medical ethics in an atmosphere of hunger, poverty, war and ever-shrinking and often non-existent resources. Nowhere else in the world is the true meaning of scarcity portrayed as vividly as in the developing countries. Consequently, the doctor's clinical freedom may have to be sacrificed by the introduction of an essential drugs list and practice guidelines. The principle of greater good, while appealing, must be carefully interpreted and applied in the developing countries. Thus, while health promotion and disease prevention must be the primary focus, health planners should avoid pushing prevention at the expense of those currently sick. Health care reform in developing countries must not merely re-echo what is being done in the industrialized countries, but must respond to societal needs and be relevant to the community in question.

摘要

诸如安乐死、代孕、器官移植和基因治疗等当代问题,在工业化国家是伦理学家们关注的焦点,但目前在大多数发展中国家却并不相关。在这些发展中国家,稀缺资源分配、牺牲奉献、跨文化研究以及跨国公司活动等方面的伦理问题才是至关重要的。在本文中,仅讨论稀缺资源分配和牺牲奉献方面的伦理问题。旨在解决发展中国家经济问题的结构调整计划却把水搅浑了。发展中国家的从业者面临的困境是,在饥饿、贫困、战争以及资源不断缩减且常常匮乏的环境中,如何坚守医学伦理的基本原则。世界上没有哪个地方比发展中国家更能生动地展现稀缺的真正含义。因此,可能不得不通过引入基本药物清单和实践指南来牺牲医生的临床自由。“最大利益”原则虽有吸引力,但在发展中国家必须谨慎解读和应用。所以,虽然健康促进和疾病预防必须是首要重点,但卫生规划者应避免以牺牲当前患病者为代价来推行预防措施。发展中国家的医疗改革绝不能仅仅重复工业化国家正在做的事情,而必须回应社会需求并与相关社区的实际情况相契合。