Otgaar Henry, Verschuere Bruno, Meijer Ewout H, van Oorsouw Kim
Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Mar;139(3):397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
A longstanding question in false memory research is whether children's implanted false memories represent actual memory traces or merely result from compliance. The current study examined this question using a response latency based deception task. Forty-five 8-year-old children received narratives about a true (first day at school) and false event (hot air balloon ride). Across two interviews, 58/32% of the participants developed a partial/full false memory. Interestingly, these children also showed higher false recall on an unrelated DRM paradigm compared to children without a false memory. The crucial finding, however, was that the results of the deception task revealed that children with partial and full false memories were faster to confirm than to deny statements relating to the false event. This indicates that children's implanted false memories reflect actual memory traces, and are unlikely to be explained by mere compliance.
错误记忆研究中一个长期存在的问题是,儿童植入的错误记忆是代表实际的记忆痕迹,还是仅仅源于顺从。本研究使用基于反应潜伏期的欺骗任务对这一问题进行了考察。45名8岁儿童听了关于一个真实事件(上学第一天)和一个虚假事件(乘坐热气球)的叙述。在两次访谈中,58/32%的参与者形成了部分/完全错误记忆。有趣的是,与没有错误记忆的儿童相比,这些儿童在无关的DRM范式中也表现出更高的错误回忆率。然而,关键的发现是,欺骗任务的结果显示,有部分和完全错误记忆的儿童确认与虚假事件相关的陈述比否认更快。这表明儿童植入的错误记忆反映了实际的记忆痕迹,不太可能仅仅用顺从来解释。