• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对抗与捐赠:流浪宠物主人与公众之间的相遇

Confrontations and donations: encounters between homeless pet owners and the public.

作者信息

Irvine Leslie, Kahl Kristina N, Smith Jesse M

机构信息

University of Colorado at Boulder.

出版信息

Sociol Q. 2012;53(1):25-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01224.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01224.x
PMID:22329059
Abstract

This study examines the interactions between homeless pet owners and the domiciled public with a focus on how the activities of pet ownership help construct positive personal identities. Homeless people are often criticized for having pets. They counter these attacks using open and contained responses to stigmatization. More often, they redefine pet ownership to incorporate how they provide for their animals, challenging definitions that require a physical home. Homeless pet owners thus create a positive moral identity by emphasizing that they feed their animals first and give them freedom that the pets of the domiciled lack. Through what we call “enabled resistance,” donations of pet food from the supportive public provide the resources to minimize the impact of stigmatization.

摘要

本研究考察了无家可归的宠物主人与居家公众之间的互动,重点关注养宠物的行为如何有助于构建积极的个人身份认同。无家可归者养宠物常常受到指责。他们通过公开且克制的方式应对污名化,以反击这些指责。更常见的是,他们重新定义养宠物的行为,将如何照顾自己的动物纳入其中,对需要有固定住所的定义提出挑战。因此,无家可归的宠物主人通过强调他们首先喂养自己的动物,并给予它们居家宠物所缺乏的自由,创造了一种积极的道德身份认同。通过我们所称的“赋能抵抗”,来自支持他们的公众的宠物食品捐赠提供了资源,以尽量减少污名化的影响。

相似文献

1
Confrontations and donations: encounters between homeless pet owners and the public.对抗与捐赠:流浪宠物主人与公众之间的相遇
Sociol Q. 2012;53(1):25-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01224.x.
2
"Near and far": social distancing in domiciled characterisations of homeless people.“近与远”:无家可归者的居住特征中的社会距离。
Urban Stud. 2011;48(8):1739-753. doi: 10.1177/0042098010377476.
3
Benefits, companion animal zoonotic disease prevalence and public perceptions of pet ownership among people experiencing homelessness in northern California.在北加利福尼亚州无家可归的人群中,宠物拥有的益处、伴侣动物人畜共患病流行情况和公众认知。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2022 Nov;69(7):806-815. doi: 10.1111/zph.12970. Epub 2022 May 23.
4
Benefits and liabilities of pets for the homeless.宠物对无家可归者的益处与弊端。
Psychol Rep. 1994 Jun;74(3 Pt 1):715-22. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.3.715.
5
Pet ownership among homeless youth: associations with mental health, service utilization and housing status.无家可归青少年的宠物饲养情况:与心理健康、服务利用及住房状况的关联
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015 Apr;46(2):237-44. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0463-5.
6
Dilemmas associated with rehousing homeless people who have companion animals.为携带伴侣动物的无家可归者重新安置住所所带来的困境。
Psychol Rep. 1995 Dec;77(3 Pt 1):851-7. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.3.851.
7
Homelessness, mental illness and the law.无家可归、精神疾病与法律。
Med Sci Law. 1997 Oct;37(4):341-4. doi: 10.1177/002580249703700410.
8
Pets, Purity and Pollution: Why Conventional Models of Disease Transmission Do Not Work for Pet Rat Owners.宠物、纯洁与污染:为什么传统的疾病传播模型不适用于宠物鼠饲养者。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 7;14(12):1526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121526.
9
Moral decision-making in pettism: The influence of animal type, pet ownership status, and social distance.小气行为中的道德决策:动物类型、宠物拥有状况和社会距离的影响
Psych J. 2023 Feb;12(1):54-72. doi: 10.1002/pchj.594. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
10
Survey to investigate pet ownership and attitudes to pet care in metropolitan Chicago dog and/or cat owners.调查都市芝加哥的狗和/或猫主人对宠物拥有和宠物护理的态度。
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Aug 1;115(3-4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.03.025. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Companion Animals in the Transition of Care: A Case Report.伴侣动物在护理过渡中的作用:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Nov 20;16(11):e74094. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74094. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Association of Socioeconomic Status and Reasons for Companion Animal Relinquishment.社会经济地位与伴侣动物被遗弃原因的关联
Animals (Basel). 2024 Sep 2;14(17):2549. doi: 10.3390/ani14172549.
3
Physical and behavioural health of dogs belonging to homeless people.无家可归者所养犬只的身体和行为健康状况。
Anim Welf. 2024 Feb 26;33:e11. doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.12. eCollection 2024.
4
The Impact of the Social Determinants of Human Health on Companion Animal Welfare.人类健康的社会决定因素对伴侣动物福利的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;13(6):1113. doi: 10.3390/ani13061113.
5
Effect of COVID-19 on Pet Food Bank Servicing: Quantifying Numbers of Clients Serviced in the Vancouver Downtown Eastside, British Columbia, Canada.2019冠状病毒病对宠物食品银行服务的影响:对加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市中心东区服务对象数量的量化
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 20;8:730390. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.730390. eCollection 2021.
6
A Multilevel Intervention Framework for Supporting People Experiencing Homelessness with Pets.一个支持有宠物的无家可归者的多层次干预框架。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;10(10):1869. doi: 10.3390/ani10101869.
7
Human-Animal Relationships and Social Work: Opportunities Beyond the Veterinary Environment.人与动物的关系与社会工作:兽医环境之外的机遇
Child Adolesc Social Work J. 2020;37(6):573-588. doi: 10.1007/s10560-020-00697-x. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
8
Acquiring a Pet Dog: A Review of Factors Affecting the Decision-Making of Prospective Dog Owners.领养宠物狗:影响准狗主人决策因素的综述
Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 28;9(4):124. doi: 10.3390/ani9040124.
9
Profiling a one-health model for priority populations.剖析针对重点人群的一体化健康模式。
Can J Public Health. 2016 Oct 20;107(3):e222-e223. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5463.
10
Pet ownership among homeless youth: associations with mental health, service utilization and housing status.无家可归青少年的宠物饲养情况:与心理健康、服务利用及住房状况的关联
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015 Apr;46(2):237-44. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0463-5.