• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新诊断开角型青光眼患者中药物治疗与激光小梁成形术的成本效益比较。

Cost-effectiveness of medications compared with laser trabeculoplasty in patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma.

作者信息

Stein Joshua D, Kim David D, Peck Will W, Giannetti Steven M, Hutton David W

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, 1000 Wall St, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;130(4):497-505. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.2727. Epub 2012 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.2727
PMID:22332202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3324653/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the most cost-effective treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed mild open-angle glaucoma: observation only, treatment with generic topical prostaglandin analogs (PGAs), or treatment with laser trabeculoplasty (LTP).

METHODS

Using a Markov model with a 25-year horizon, we compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of treating newly diagnosed mild open-angle glaucoma with PGAs, LTP, or observation only.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness of LTP over no treatment is $16,824 per quality-adjusted life year. By comparison, the incremental cost-effectiveness of PGAs over no treatment is $14,179 per quality-adjusted life year, and they provide greater health-related quality of life relative to LTP. If PGAs are 25% less effective owing to poor patient adherence, LTP can confer greater value.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostaglandin analogs and LTP are both cost-effective options for the management of newly diagnosed mild open-angle glaucoma. Assuming optimal medication adherence, PGAs confer greater value compared with LTP. However, when assuming more realistic levels of medication adherence (making them 25% less effective than the documented effectiveness reported in clinical trials), at current prices for PGAs, LTP may be a more cost-effective alternative.

摘要

目的

确定新诊断为轻度开角型青光眼患者最具成本效益的治疗方案:仅观察、使用普通局部前列腺素类似物(PGA)治疗或激光小梁成形术(LTP)治疗。

方法

我们使用一个为期25年的马尔可夫模型,比较了用PGA、LTP或仅观察来治疗新诊断的轻度开角型青光眼的增量成本效益。

结果

与不治疗相比,LTP的增量成本效益为每质量调整生命年16,824美元。相比之下,PGA与不治疗相比的增量成本效益为每质量调整生命年14,179美元,并且相对于LTP,它们能提供更高的与健康相关的生活质量。如果由于患者依从性差,PGA的效果降低25%,LTP可能具有更大的价值。

结论

前列腺素类似物和LTP都是治疗新诊断的轻度开角型青光眼的具有成本效益的选择。假设药物依从性最佳,与LTP相比,PGA具有更大的价值。然而,当假设药物依从性处于更现实的水平(使其比临床试验中报告的记录有效性低25%)时,以目前PGA的价格,LTP可能是一种更具成本效益的选择。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of medications compared with laser trabeculoplasty in patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma.新诊断开角型青光眼患者中药物治疗与激光小梁成形术的成本效益比较。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;130(4):497-505. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.2727. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
2
The cost-effectiveness of medication, laser trabeculoplasty, and trabeculectomy for treatment of open-angle glaucoma in South Korea.药物、激光小梁成形术和小梁切除术治疗韩国开角型青光眼的成本效益
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(2):e14026. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014026.
3
Assessment of the cost effectiveness of travoprost versus latanoprost as single agents for treatment of glaucoma in France.法国曲伏前列素与拉坦前列素单药治疗青光眼的成本效益评估。
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(3):183-98. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828030-00005.
4
Comparative Cost-effectiveness of the Baerveldt Implant, Trabeculectomy With Mitomycin, and Medical Treatment.贝伐滤过性小梁切开术、丝裂霉素小梁切除术与药物治疗的成本效益比较。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 May;133(5):560-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.44.
5
Maximizing cost-effectiveness by adjusting treatment strategy according to glaucoma severity.根据青光眼严重程度调整治疗策略以实现成本效益最大化。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e5745. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005745.
6
Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus drops for newly diagnosed ocular hypertension and glaucoma: the LiGHT RCT.选择性激光小梁成形术与滴眼液治疗新发眼压升高和青光眼的比较:LiGHT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(31):1-102. doi: 10.3310/hta23310.
7
Cost-comparison of two trabecular micro-bypass stents versus selective laser trabeculoplasty or medications only for intraocular pressure control for patients with open-angle glaucoma.两种小梁微旁路支架与选择性激光小梁成形术或仅使用药物控制开角型青光眼患者眼压的成本比较。
J Med Econ. 2017 Jul;20(7):760-766. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1327439. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
A cost-effectiveness analysis of fixed-combination therapies in patients with open-angle glaucoma: a European perspective.开角型青光眼患者固定复方疗法的成本效益分析:欧洲视角
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Apr;24(4):1057-63. doi: 10.1185/030079908x280626. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
9
Cost-Utility Analysis of Glaucoma Medication Adherence.青光眼药物治疗依从性的成本-效用分析。
Ophthalmology. 2020 May;127(5):589-598. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.041. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
10
Comparing the effectiveness of selective laser trabeculoplasty with topical medication as initial treatment (the Glaucoma Initial Treatment Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.比较选择性激光小梁成形术与局部用药作为初始治疗的有效性(青光眼初始治疗研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Sep 11;16:406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0924-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Latest research hot spots of glaucoma management using selective laser trabeculoplasty: a bibliometric analysis and visualized review.使用选择性激光小梁成形术治疗青光眼的最新研究热点:文献计量分析与可视化综述
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 22;45(1):346. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03699-9.
2
Systematic methodological review of health state values in glaucoma cost-utility analyses.系统评价方法学在青光眼成本效用分析中健康状态值的研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Nov;25(8):1417-1435. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01663-x. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
3
Is primary trabeculectomy cost-effective for patients with advanced primary open angle glaucoma? Results from the Treatment of Advanced Glaucoma Study economic model.原发性小梁切除术对晚期原发性开角型青光眼患者是否具有成本效益?来自高级青光眼研究经济模型的结果。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 22;108(9):1210-1215. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323390.
4
Rates of Laser Trabeculoplasty by Ophthalmologists and Optometrists: A Comparative Analysis of the CMS Medicare Public Use File.眼科医生和验光师进行激光小梁成形术的比率:对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)医疗保险公共使用文件的比较分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 30;18:269-275. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S438052. eCollection 2024.
5
Alternatives to Topical Glaucoma Medication for Glaucoma Management.用于青光眼治疗的局部用青光眼药物的替代方法。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 14;17:3899-3913. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S439457. eCollection 2023.
6
Challenging the "Topical Medications-First" Approach to Glaucoma: A Treatment Paradigm in Evolution.挑战青光眼“局部用药优先”的治疗方法:一种不断演变的治疗模式。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):2823-2839. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00831-9. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Cost-utility analysis of commonly used anti-glaucoma interventions for mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma patients in rural and urban China.中国农村和城市轻中度原发性开角型青光眼患者常用抗青光眼干预措施的成本-效用分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):e073219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073219.
8
Cost-effectiveness of primary surgical versus primary medical management in the treatment of patients presenting with advanced glaucoma.原发性手术与原发性药物治疗在晚期青光眼患者治疗中的成本效益
Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 26;107(10):1452-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2021-320887.
9
The Cost-Effectiveness of a Telemedicine Screening Program for Diabetic Retinopathy in New York City.纽约市糖尿病视网膜病变远程医疗筛查项目的成本效益
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 May 17;16:1505-1512. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S357766. eCollection 2022.
10
Laser Trabeculoplasty Perceptions and Practice Patterns of Canadian Ophthalmologists.加拿大眼科医生对激光小梁成形术的认知与实践模式
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2020 Sep-Dec;14(3):81-86. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1283.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between glaucoma medication adherence, eye drop technique, and visual field defect severity.青光眼药物治疗依从性、滴眼技术与视野缺损严重程度之间的关系。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Dec;118(12):2398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.013.
2
Do adherence rates and glaucomatous visual field progression correlate?依从率与青光眼视野进展是否相关?
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(4):410-4. doi: 10.5301/EJO.2010.6112.
3
United States life tables, 2006.《2006年美国生命表》
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010 Jun 28;58(21):1-40.
4
Health spending projections through 2019: the recession's impact continues.2019 年之前的卫生支出预测:经济衰退的影响仍在持续。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):522-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1074. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
5
Development of an instrument to measure glaucoma medication self-efficacy and outcome expectations.开发一种用于测量青光眼药物自我效能和结果预期的工具。
Eye (Lond). 2010 Apr;24(4):624-31. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.174. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
6
Risk factors for poor adherence to eyedrops in electronically monitored patients with glaucoma.电子监测的青光眼患者滴眼剂依从性差的危险因素。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1097-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.021. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
7
The cost-effectiveness of routine office-based identification and subsequent medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma in the United States.美国原发性开角型青光眼基于门诊的常规诊断及后续治疗的成本效益分析
Ophthalmology. 2009 May;116(5):823-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.056. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
8
Risk factors for first presentation of glaucoma with significant visual field loss.首次出现伴有显著视野缺损的青光眼的危险因素。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;36(3):217-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01716.x.
9
Rates of glaucoma medication utilization among persons with primary open-angle glaucoma, 1992 to 2002.1992年至2002年原发性开角型青光眼患者的青光眼药物使用率
Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1315-9, 1319.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.017. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
10
United States life tables, 2004.美国生命表,2004年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007 Dec 28;56(9):1-39.