Suppr超能文献

用于区分兔出血症病毒与澳大利亚非致病性兔杯状病毒的血清学检测方法。

Serological assays to discriminate rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus from Australian non-pathogenic rabbit calicivirus.

机构信息

Ecosystem Sciences Division, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australia.

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 2012 Jun 15;157(3-4):345-54. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

Abstract

Serological cross reactivity between the virulent rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) and the closely related but non-pathogenic rabbit calicivirus (RCV) makes it difficult to study the epidemiology of each virus and the interaction between them when both viruses co-circulate in wild rabbit populations. ELISA methods for the diagnosis of RHDV infection are well characterized, but no specific serological tests for RCV have been developed. Following the characterization of Australian non-pathogenic RCV-A1 strains, we used virus-like-particles (VLPs) and anti-RCV-A1 specific antibodies to establish a set of isotype ELISAs for detection of IgG, IgA and IgM in rabbit sera and secretory mucosal IgA in rectal swabs, and two competition ELISAs. These assays were used to discriminate between anti-RCV-A1 and anti-RHDV antibodies in rabbits. The isotype ELISAs were highly sensitive for detection of anti-RCV-A1 antibodies, but varying levels of cross reactivity from anti-RHDV antibodies occurred in the isotype ELISAs and one competition ELISA. However, the second competition ELISA specifically detected antibodies to RCV-A1 and showed no cross reactivity to anti-RHDV sera. These ELISAs provide important tools to monitor RCV-A1 infection when it occurs alone, and to discriminate between RHDV and RCV-A1 infection when they occur in the same rabbit population. When used in parallel with RHDV serology, they could be used to monitor the dynamics of these two closely related but pathogenically distinct viruses in wild and domestic rabbit populations.

摘要

兔出血症病毒(RHDV)与密切相关但无致病性的兔冠状病毒(RCV)之间存在血清交叉反应,这使得在野生兔群中两种病毒共同传播时,难以研究每种病毒的流行病学及其相互作用。用于诊断 RHDV 感染的 ELISA 方法已得到很好的描述,但尚未开发出针对 RCV 的特异性血清学检测方法。在对澳大利亚非致病性 RCV-A1 株进行特征描述后,我们使用病毒样颗粒(VLPs)和抗 RCV-A1 特异性抗体,建立了一组用于检测兔血清 IgG、IgA 和 IgM 以及直肠拭子中分泌型黏膜 IgA 的同种型 ELISA,并建立了两种竞争 ELISA。这些检测方法用于区分兔体内的抗 RCV-A1 抗体和抗 RHDV 抗体。同种型 ELISA 对检测抗 RCV-A1 抗体具有很高的敏感性,但在同种型 ELISA 和一种竞争 ELISA 中,抗 RHDV 抗体存在不同程度的交叉反应。然而,第二种竞争 ELISA 特异性检测到针对 RCV-A1 的抗体,对 RHDV 血清无交叉反应。这些 ELISA 为单独发生 RCV-A1 感染时的监测提供了重要工具,并为两种密切相关但致病性不同的病毒同时感染时的区分提供了工具。当与 RHDV 血清学平行使用时,它们可用于监测野生和家兔种群中这两种密切相关但致病性不同的病毒的动态。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验