Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Epidemiol Infect. 2012 Dec;140(12):2131-41. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812000179. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
The most common methods for evaluating interventions to reduce the rate of new Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in hospitals use segmented regression or interrupted time-series analysis. We describe approaches to evaluating interventions introduced in different healthcare units at different times. We compare fitting a segmented Poisson regression in each hospital unit with pooling the individual estimates by inverse variance. An extension of this approach to accommodate potential heterogeneity allows estimates to be calculated from a single statistical model: a 'stacked' model. It can be used to ascertain whether transmission rates before the intervention have the same slope in all units, whether the immediate impact of the intervention is the same in all units, and whether transmission rates have the same slope after the intervention. The methods are illustrated by analyses of data from a study at a Veterans Affairs hospital. Both approaches yielded consistent results. Where feasible, a model adjusting for the unit effect should be fitted, or if there is heterogeneity, an analysis incorporating a random effect for units may be appropriate.
评估干预措施以降低医院中新发金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染率的最常用方法是使用分段回归或中断时间序列分析。我们描述了评估在不同时间引入不同医疗单位的干预措施的方法。我们比较了在每个医院单位拟合分段泊松回归与通过逆方差合并个体估计值。这种方法的扩展可以适应潜在的异质性,允许从单个统计模型计算估计值:“堆叠”模型。它可用于确定干预前的传播率在所有单位中是否具有相同的斜率,干预的直接影响在所有单位中是否相同,以及干预后传播率是否具有相同的斜率。该方法通过对退伍军人事务医院研究的数据进行分析进行了说明。两种方法都得到了一致的结果。在可行的情况下,应拟合调整单位效应的模型,或者如果存在异质性,则可能需要对单位进行包含随机效应的分析。