Suppr超能文献

[不同形态年龄相关性白内障患者视觉质量的临床评估]

[Clinical evaluation of quality of vision with age-related cataract of different morphologies].

作者信息

Peng Cheng, Zhao Jiang-yue, Ma Li-wei, Qu Bo, Zhang Jin-song

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Eye Hospital of China Medical University, Key Laboratory of Lens Research of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110005, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;47(11):1001-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate influence of cataract morphology on quality of vision in measurement of straylight and contrast sensitivity (CS), and to determine which type of cataract presents higher impairment of quality of vision.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 76 eyes of 76 age-related cataract patients who treated in the Eye Hospital of China Medical University from February 2010 to December 2010 with a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.5 or better, were classified into 3 groups: cortical cataract group (33 eyes of 33 subjects), nuclear cataract group (20 eyes of 20 subjects), posterior cataract group (23 eyes of 23 subjects), as well as normal control group (26 eyes of 26 subjects). BCVA, CS and intraocular straylight were respectively measured with phoropter, C-Quant straylight meter and CSV-1000E contrast sensitivity tester. Subjective quality of vision was examined with visual function index-14 (VF-14).

RESULTS

Age, BCVA, straylight levels and CS at 3, 6, 12 and 18 c/d were 66.1 ± 6.7, 0.58 ± 0.10, 1.50 ± 0.24, 1.33 ± 0.19, 1.21 ± 0.18, 1.01 ± 0.19, and 0.50 ± 0.09 in the cortical group, 67.6 ± 5.0, 0.62 ± 0.11, 1.46 ± 0.11, 1.38 ± 0.19, 1.28 ± 0.19, 1.09 ± 0.18, and 0.54 ± 0.09 in the nuclear group, 60.6 ± 7.1, 0.57 ± 0.09, 1.85 ± 0.26, 1.11 ± 0.12, 1.04 ± 0.13, 0.89 ± 0.13, 0.34 ± 0.11 in the posterior group, and 63.9 ± 7.3, 1.00 ± 0.11, 1.28 ± 0.17, 1.58 ± 0.19, 1.72 ± 0.21, 1.53 ± 0.19, and 0.71 ± 0.11 in the normal eyes, respectively (F = 9.983, F = 103.925, F = 31.760, F = 28.871, F = 65.889, F = 66.453, F = 61.540; P = 0.000). In SNK-q test, BCVA, levels of straylight and CS at each spatial frequency in the normal eyes were significantly different from that in cataracts of different morphologies (P < 0.05); BCVA did not differ significantly for cataract of the 3 types (P > 0.05); age, straylight levels and CS at each spatial frequency in posterior cataract had significant differences compared with that in cortical and nuclear cataracts (P < 0.05); no significant differences were found between the cortical and nuclear cataracts (P > 0.05). The mean visual function index-14 (VF-14) showed significantly differences (F = 10.211, P = 0.000). When controlling for ages, there were no significant correlation between BCVA and straylight in cortical, nuclear and posterior cataracts (r = -0.227, r = -0.279, r = -0.373; P > 0.05). Correlations between BCVA and CS at 3, 6, 12 and 18 c/d were: r = 0.569, r = 0.517, r = 0.500, r = 0.449 (P < 0.01) in cortical cataracts; r = 0.657, r = 0.542, r = 0.513, r = 0.492 (P < 0.05) in nuclear cataracts; however, BCVA had no significant correlation with CS at spatial frequency any in posterior cataracts (P > 0.05). VF-14 significantly correlated with BCVA, straylight and CS in cortical and nuclear cataracts (r = 0.670, r = -0.740, r = 0.811, r = 0.826, r = 0.809, r = 0.720, P < 0.01; r = 0.731, r = -0.721, r = 0.816, r = 0.769, r = 0.738, r = 0.728, P ≤ 0.01); VF-14 correlated with straylight and CS (r = -0.910, r = 0.879, r = 0.896, r = 0.874, r = 0.844; P < 0.001), whereas VF-14 did not correlate with BCVA in posterior cataracts (r = 0.370, P = 0.090).

CONCLUSIONS

Since visual acuity could underestimate the influence of cataract morphology on quality of vision, most notably in posterior cataract, straylight and CS are sensitive, complementary to BCVA when estimating real-world quality of vision of cataracts, and should be taken into account when considering therapy and cataract surgery.

摘要

目的

探讨白内障形态对测量杂散光和对比敏感度(CS)时视觉质量的影响,并确定哪种类型的白内障对视觉质量的损害更大。

方法

在一项横断面研究中,将2010年2月至2010年12月在中国医科大学眼科医院接受治疗、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为0.5或更好的76例年龄相关性白内障患者的76只眼分为3组:皮质性白内障组(33例患者的33只眼)、核性白内障组(20例患者的20只眼)、后囊下白内障组(23例患者的23只眼),以及正常对照组(26例患者的26只眼)。分别使用综合验光仪、C-Quant杂散光仪和CSV-1000E对比敏感度测试仪测量BCVA、CS和眼内杂散光。使用视觉功能指数-14(VF-14)检查主观视觉质量。

结果

皮质性白内障组的年龄、BCVA、3、6、12和18 c/d时的杂散光水平及CS分别为66.1±6.7、0.58±0.10、1.50±0.24、1.33±0.19、1.21±0.18、1.01±0.19和0.50±0.09;核性白内障组分别为67.6±5.0、0.62±0.11、1.46±0.11、1.38±0.19、1.28±0.19、1.09±0.18和0.54±0.09;后囊下白内障组分别为60.6±7.1、0.57±0.09、1.85±0.26、1.11±0.12、1.04±0.13、0.89±0.13和0.34±0.11;正常眼分别为63.9±7.3、1.00±0.11、1.28±0.17、1.58±0.19、1.72±0.21、1.53±0.19和0.71±0.11(F = 9.983,F = 103.925,F = 31.760,F = 28.871,F = 65.889,F = 66.453,F = 61.540;P = 0.000)。在SNK-q检验中,正常眼的BCVA、各空间频率下的杂散光水平及CS与不同形态白内障的相应指标有显著差异(P < 0.05);3种类型白内障的BCVA差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);后囊下白内障的年龄、杂散光水平及各空间频率下的CS与皮质性和核性白内障相比有显著差异(P < 0.05);皮质性和核性白内障之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。平均视觉功能指数-14(VF-14)显示出显著差异(F = 10.211,P = 0.000)。在控制年龄后,皮质性、核性和后囊下白内障的BCVA与杂散光之间无显著相关性(r = -0.227,r = -0.279,r = -0.373;P > 0.05)。皮质性白内障在3、6、12和18 c/d时BCVA与CS的相关性分别为:r = 0.569,r = 0.517,r = 0.500,r = 0.449(P < 0.01);核性白内障分别为:r = 0.657,r = 0.542,r = 0.513,r = 0.492(P < 0.05);然而,后囊下白内障在任何空间频率下BCVA与CS均无显著相关性(P > 0.05)。VF-14与皮质性和核性白内障的BCVA、杂散光及CS显著相关(r = 0.670,r = -0.740,r = 0.811,r = 0.826,r = 0.809,r = 0.720,P < 0.01;r = 0.731,r = -0.721,r = 0.816,r = 0.769,r = 0.738,r = 0.728,P ≤ 0.01);VF-14与杂散光及CS相关(r = -0.910,r = 0.879,r = 0.896,r = 0.874,r = 0.844;P < 0.001),而后囊下白内障中VF-14与BCVA无相关性(r = 0.370,P = 0.090)。

结论

由于视力可能低估白内障形态对视觉质量的影响,尤其是在后囊下白内障中,杂散光和CS较为敏感,在评估白内障的实际视觉质量时可作为BCVA的补充,在考虑治疗和白内障手术时应予以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验