Suppr超能文献

[年龄相关性白内障患者视觉功能的早期临床评估]

[Early clinical evaluation of visual function in patients with age-related cataract].

作者信息

Fu Jing, Wang Jun, Wang Ning-li, Kang Hui-juan

机构信息

Beijing Tongren Ophthalmic Center, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Mar;42(3):236-40.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and glare contrast sensitivity in age-related cataract patients.

METHODS

In this study, 115 eyes of 66 age-related cataract patients with a best corrected visual acuity of 0.5 or better, who had been classified into cortical cataract group (50 eyes of 31 subjects), nuclear sclerosis group (32 eyes of 17 subjects), posterior subcapsular cataract group (33 eyes of 18 subjects); and control group (34 eyes of 34 subjects) were examined with a contrast glare tester to assess contrast sensitivity and glare contrast sensitivity.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences among contrast sensitivity and glare contrast sensitivity in the cataract patients with different visual acuity at low, medium spatial frequency (P < 0.01); there were no statistically significant differences among those at high spatial frequency (P > 0.05). Cortical cataract was associated with the contrast sensitivity at low, medium spatial frequency, where the glare contrast sensitivity fell into at low, medium and high spatial frequency; in the patients with cataract of nuclear sclerosis was associated with the contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequency, where the glare contrast sensitivity was at low, medium and high spatial frequency; in contrast to posterior subcapsular cataract both the contrast sensitivity and glare contrast sensitivity (at low, medium, high spatial frequency) were lower than normal eyes (P < 0.05). Each spatial frequency of contrast sensitivity and glare contrast sensitivity in 57 cataract eyes with a best corrected visual acuity of 0.8 or better were lower than normal eyes. In those eyes the contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequency and glare contrast sensitivity at low and high spatial frequency had statistically significant difference compared with control (P < 0.05); other spatial frequency had no statistically significant difference among groups (P > 0.05). The glare contrast sensitivity in cataract eyes was lower than contrast sensitivity at visual angle of 6.3 degrees, 4.0 degrees, 2.5 degrees, 1.6 degrees, 1.0 degrees, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Contrast sensitivity and glare contrast sensitivity are reliable in evaluating visual function in the patients with early age-related cataract.

摘要

目的

探讨年龄相关性白内障患者的视力、对比敏感度及眩光对比敏感度特征。

方法

本研究中,选取66例年龄相关性白内障患者的115只眼,最佳矫正视力为0.5或更好,将其分为皮质性白内障组(31例患者的50只眼)、核性硬化组(17例患者的32只眼)、后囊下白内障组(18例患者的33只眼);对照组(34例患者的34只眼),使用对比眩光测试仪检查以评估对比敏感度和眩光对比敏感度。

结果

不同视力的白内障患者在低、中空间频率下的对比敏感度和眩光对比敏感度存在统计学显著差异(P<0.01);在高空间频率下无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。皮质性白内障与低、中空间频率下的对比敏感度相关,其眩光对比敏感度在低、中、高空间频率均下降;核性硬化性白内障患者与低空间频率下的对比敏感度相关,其眩光对比敏感度在低、中、高空间频率均有体现;后囊下白内障相比,其对比敏感度和眩光对比敏感度(在低、中、高空间频率)均低于正常眼(P<0.05)。57只最佳矫正视力为0.8或更好的白内障眼中,各空间频率的对比敏感度和眩光对比敏感度均低于正常眼。在这些眼中,低空间频率的对比敏感度以及低、高空间频率的眩光对比敏感度与对照组相比有统计学显著差异(P<0.05);其他空间频率组间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。白内障眼中的眩光对比敏感度低于视角为6.3度、4.0度、2.5度、1.6度、1.0度时的对比敏感度,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。

结论

对比敏感度和眩光对比敏感度在评估早期年龄相关性白内障患者的视觉功能方面是可靠的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验