Saari Antti J, Kentala Jukka, Mattila Kari J
University of Tampere, Tampere FI-33014, Finland.
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Feb 16;5:101. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-101.
Brief tobacco intervention has been used in promoting smoking cessation and preventing the initiation of smoking. We used a cohort born in 1979 (n = 2 586) from four cities in Finland. Those born on odd days received up to four brief tobacco interventions during their annual school dental check-ups in 1992-1994 (at the age of 13-15). Those who were born on even days were used as a control group. In 2008 a follow-up questionnaire was sent to the cohort. The aim of this study was to ascertain the long-term effectiveness of brief tobacco intervention given in dental health care during school age.
Responses were received from 529 people in the intervention group and 491 in the control group. In the intervention group and control group by the age of 29 there were 15.3% and 18.5% smokers respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. The difference between groups was similar to that observed when they were 14 years old.
Brief tobacco intervention performed in dental health care in adolescence did not show effectiveness in the long-term follow-up. This type of intervention alone is insufficient to prevent smoking but supports other anti-smoking activities.
This study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01348646).
简短烟草干预已被用于促进戒烟和预防吸烟行为的开始。我们使用了来自芬兰四个城市的1979年出生的队列(n = 2586)。在1992 - 1994年(13 - 15岁)的年度学校牙科检查期间,在奇数日出生的人接受了多达四次简短烟草干预。在偶数日出生的人作为对照组。2008年,向该队列发送了一份随访问卷。本研究的目的是确定学龄期牙科保健中进行的简短烟草干预的长期效果。
干预组有529人回复,对照组有491人回复。到29岁时,干预组和对照组的吸烟者分别为15.3%和18.5%。这种差异无统计学意义。两组之间的差异与他们14岁时观察到的差异相似。
青春期牙科保健中进行的简短烟草干预在长期随访中未显示出效果。仅这种类型的干预不足以预防吸烟,但可支持其他反吸烟活动。