Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1341-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.102. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
As the American population ages, benign prostatic hyperplasia and its associated lower urinary tract symptoms have become increasingly important causes of chronic morbidity. We assessed the comparative effectiveness of 2 common forms of surgical therapy, transurethral prostate resection and laser therapy, for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Using patient level discharge data and revisit files from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality we evaluated a cohort of patients who underwent transurethral prostate resection or laser therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in 2005 in California. Short-term outcomes, including in hospital complications, length of stay, 30-day rehospitalization, 30-day repeat surgery and 30-day emergency room visits, were compared between the therapies by regression analysis. Long-term re-treatment, defined as the absence of secondary procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia or complications of therapy, was assessed by survival analysis. Analysis was adjusted for medical comorbidity, race, age and insurance status.
Data on 11,645 hospital discharges showed that mean length of stay was shorter for laser therapy than for transurethral prostate resection (0.70 vs 2.03 days, p<0.0001). The 30-day repeat visit occurred in 16% of laser and 17.7% of resection cases (p=0.0338). The 4-year re-treatment rate was 8.3% for resection and 12.8% for laser therapy (p<0.0001). After adjustment patients with resection were 37% less likely to require repeat therapy than those with laser therapy (HR 0.64, p<0.0001).
Laser procedures and transurethral prostate resection provide effective management of benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms. Laser procedures are associated with less need for hospitalization than transurethral prostate resection but appear to involve a trade-off in long-term efficacy.
随着美国人口老龄化,良性前列腺增生及其相关的下尿路症状已成为导致慢性发病的日益重要的原因。我们评估了两种常见的手术治疗形式,经尿道前列腺切除术和激光治疗,对良性前列腺增生的比较效果。
使用患者水平的出院数据和来自医疗保健研究与质量机构的复诊文件,我们评估了 2005 年在加利福尼亚州接受经尿道前列腺切除术或激光治疗的良性前列腺增生患者队列。通过回归分析比较两种治疗方法的短期结果,包括住院并发症、住院时间、30 天再住院、30 天重复手术和 30 天急诊就诊。通过生存分析评估长期再治疗,定义为没有因良性前列腺增生或治疗并发症而进行的二次手术。分析调整了医疗合并症、种族、年龄和保险状况。
11645 例住院出院数据显示,激光治疗的平均住院时间短于经尿道前列腺切除术(0.70 天比 2.03 天,p<0.0001)。30 天重复就诊发生在激光治疗的 16%和经尿道前列腺切除术的 17.7%(p=0.0338)。4 年再治疗率为经尿道前列腺切除术 8.3%,激光治疗 12.8%(p<0.0001)。调整后,与激光治疗相比,接受经尿道前列腺切除术的患者再次治疗的可能性低 37%(HR 0.64,p<0.0001)。
激光治疗和经尿道前列腺切除术是治疗良性前列腺增生/下尿路症状的有效方法。与经尿道前列腺切除术相比,激光治疗住院时间较短,但在长期疗效方面似乎存在权衡。