Suppr超能文献

与标准技术相比,双极“纽扣”式前列腺等离子汽化术治疗良性前列腺梗阻的疗效

Efficacy of bipolar "button" plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique.

作者信息

Aboutaleb Hamdy

机构信息

Department of Urology, Minoufiya University Hospitals, Minoufiya, Egypt ; Division of Urology, Mayo Hospital, Hodiedah, Yemen.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2015 Oct-Dec;7(4):442-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.152019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the following study is to evaluate the efficiency of transurethral plasma vaporization of the prostate in saline bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate (BPVP) using the button electrode and comparing it to the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the period of the year between 2007 and 2013, 152 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were rolled in our study. Fifty-two patients were underwent BPVP and 100 TURP. All patients were evaluated preoperatively, 24 h and at 3 months postoperatively. International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), quality-of-life (QOL) score, Qmax and Qave and post void residual (PVR) urine. Operative time, hospital stay, catheterization time, and complications were reported. Mean serum Hb, hematocrit and serum sodium changes were reported preoperatively and within 24 h postoperatively in both groups. Statistical analysis is performed using SPSS program version 20 for windows.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 60.8 ± 8 (range 63- 92) and 66 ± 8.6 (range 50-83) for BPVP and TURP groups, respectively. Mean prostatic volume was 46 ± 11 (range 30-92) and 43 ± 8 (range 30-80) in both groups, respectively. Patients from both series had similar preoperative characteristics. The mean operative duration 53 ± 21 1 ± 2.1 (range 1-7) versus 3 ± 3.3 (range 3-8) days (P value 0.0001) were significantly (range 20-80) versus 62 ± 16 min (range 30-126) (P value 0.004), catheterization period 2 ± 0.28 ( range 2-4) versus 3 ± 3.2 (range 2-7) days (P value 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

BPVP has superior efficacy in short-term results and less complication rates compared with classic TURP.

摘要

目的

以下研究的目的是评估使用纽扣电极在前列腺盐水双极等离子体汽化术(BPVP)中经尿道前列腺等离子体汽化的效率,并将其与标准经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)进行比较。

患者与方法

在2007年至2013年期间,152例良性前列腺增生患者纳入我们的研究。52例行BPVP,100例行TURP。所有患者在术前、术后24小时及术后3个月进行评估。评估国际前列腺症状评分(I-PSS)、生活质量(QOL)评分、最大尿流率(Qmax)、平均尿流率(Qave)及残余尿量(PVR)。记录手术时间、住院时间、导尿时间及并发症情况。两组均报告术前及术后24小时内平均血清血红蛋白、血细胞比容及血清钠的变化。使用适用于Windows的SPSS 20版程序进行统计分析。

结果

BPVP组和TURP组手术时的平均年龄分别为60.8±8(范围63 - 92岁)和66±8.6(范围50 - 83岁)。两组的平均前列腺体积分别为46±11(范围30 - 92)和43±8(范围30 - 80)。两个系列的患者术前特征相似。平均手术持续时间分别为53±21分钟(范围20 - 80分钟)和62±16分钟(范围30 - 126分钟)(P值0.004),导尿期分别为2±0.28天(范围2 - 4天)和3±3.2天(范围2 - 7天)(P值0.03),住院时间分别为1±2.1天(范围1 - 7天)和3±3.3天(范围3 - 8天)(P值0.0001),差异均有统计学意义。

结论

与经典TURP相比,BPVP在短期结果方面疗效更佳,并发症发生率更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2640/4660693/a0bb753a55e3/UA-7-442-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验