Grzyb Joanna, Xu Fei, Nanda Vikas, Luczkowska Renata, Reijerse Eduard, Lubitz Wolfgang, Noy Dror
Institute of Physics, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Aug;1817(8):1256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
Here, we compare two approaches of protein design. A computational approach was used in the design of the coiled-coil iron-sulfur protein, CCIS, as a four helix bundle binding an iron-sulfur cluster within its hydrophobic core. An empirical approach was used for designing the redox-chain maquette, RCM as a four-helix bundle assembling iron-sulfur clusters within loops and one heme in the middle of its hydrophobic core. We demonstrate that both ways of design yielded the desired proteins in terms of secondary structure and cofactors assembly. Both approaches, however, still have much to improve in predicting conformational changes in the presence of bound cofactors, controlling oligomerization tendency and stabilizing the bound iron-sulfur clusters in the reduced state. Lessons from both ways of design and future directions of development are discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Photosynthesis Research for Sustainability: from Natural to Artificial.
在此,我们比较了两种蛋白质设计方法。在设计卷曲螺旋铁硫蛋白CCIS时采用了计算方法,它是一个四螺旋束,在其疏水核心内结合一个铁硫簇。在设计氧化还原链模型RCM时采用了经验方法,它也是一个四螺旋束,在环内组装铁硫簇,并在其疏水核心中间有一个血红素。我们证明,就二级结构和辅因子组装而言,这两种设计方法都产生了所需的蛋白质。然而,这两种方法在预测结合辅因子时的构象变化、控制寡聚化趋势以及稳定还原状态下结合的铁硫簇方面仍有很大的改进空间。本文讨论了这两种设计方法的经验教训以及未来的发展方向。本文是名为“可持续性光合作用研究:从自然到人工”的特刊的一部分。