VA Health Services Research and Development Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa, USA.
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):8-19. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318239f9e1.
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to describe and quantify individual interventions used in multicomponent outpatient heart failure management programs.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between 1995 and 2008 were searched using 10 search terms. Randomized controlled trials evaluating outpatient programs that addressed comprehensive care to decrease readmissions for patients with heart failure were identified. Forty-three articles reporting on 35 studies that reported readmissions separately from other outcomes were included. Three investigators independently abstracted primary study characteristics and outcomes.
In the 35 studies, participants included 8071 subjects who were typically older (mean [SD] age, 70.7 [6.5] years) and male (59%). Using our coding scheme, the number of individual interventions within a program ranged from 1 to 7 within individual studies; the most commonly used interventions were patient education, symptom monitoring by study staff, symptom monitoring by patients, and medication adherence strategies. Most programs had a teaching component with a mean (SD) of 6.4 (3.9) individual topics covered; frequent teaching topics were symptom recognition and management, medication review, and self-monitoring. Fewer than half of the 35 studies reviewed reported adequate data to be included in the meta-analysis. Some outcomes were infrequently reported, limiting statistical power to detect treatment effects.
A number of studies evaluating multicomponent HF management programs have found positive effects on important patient outcomes. The contribution of the individual interventions included in the multicomponent program on patient outcomes remains unclear. Future studies of chronic disease interventions must include descriptions of recommended key program components to identify critical program components.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是描述和量化多组分门诊心力衰竭管理方案中使用的个体干预措施。
使用 10 个检索词,检索 1995 年至 2008 年间的 MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。确定了评估门诊项目的随机对照试验,这些项目针对综合护理,以减少心力衰竭患者的再入院率。有 43 篇文章分别报告了 35 项研究的结果,这些研究单独报告了再入院率和其他结果。3 位研究者独立提取了主要研究特征和结果。
在 35 项研究中,参与者包括 8071 名年龄较大(平均[标准差]年龄 70.7[6.5]岁)和男性(59%)的患者。使用我们的编码方案,个体研究中方案内的个体干预措施数量从 1 到 7 不等;最常用的干预措施是患者教育、研究人员对症状的监测、患者对症状的监测和药物依从性策略。大多数方案都有教学环节,平均(标准差)涵盖 6.4(3.9)个个体主题;常见的教学主题是症状识别和管理、药物审查和自我监测。在 35 项研究中,只有不到一半的研究报告了足够的数据纳入荟萃分析。一些结果报告不频繁,限制了检测治疗效果的统计能力。
一些评估多组分 HF 管理方案的研究发现,这些方案对重要的患者结局有积极影响。多组分方案中包含的个体干预措施对患者结局的影响仍不清楚。未来对慢性病干预措施的研究必须包括对推荐的关键方案组成部分的描述,以确定关键的方案组成部分。