Research Unit, Analysis and Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Sport Performance, Higher Institute of Sports and Physical Education, Ksar said, Tunisia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Dec;26(12):3454-60. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824eddda.
ABThe aim of this study was to examine absolute and relative reliabilities and external responsiveness of the Karate-specific aerobic test (KSAT). This study comprised 43 male karatekas, 19 of them participated in the first study to establish test-retest reliability and 40, selected on the bases of their karate experience and level of practice, participated in the second study to identify external responsiveness of the KSAT. The latter group was divided into 2 categories: national-level group (G(n)) and regional-level group (G(r)). Analysis showed excellent test-retest reliability of time to exhaustion (TE), with intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1) >0.90, standard error of measurement (SEM) <5%: (3.2%) and mean difference (bias) ± the 95% limits of agreement: -9.5 ± 78.8 seconds. There was a significant difference between test-retest session in peak lactate concentration (Peak [La]) (9.12 ± 2.59 vs. 8.05 ± 2.67 mmol·L(-1); p < 0.05) but not in peak heart rate (HRpeak) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (196 ± 9 vs. 194 ± 9 b·min(-1) and 7.6 ± 0.93 vs. 7.8 ± 1.15; p > 0.05), respectively. National-level karate athletes (1,032 ± 101 seconds) were better than regional level (841 ± 134 seconds) on TE performance during KSAT (p < 0.001). Thus, KSAT provided good external responsiveness. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve was >0.70 (0.86; confidence interval 95%: 0.72-0.95). Significant difference was detected in Peak [La] between national- (6.09 ± 1.78 mmol·L(-1)) and regional-level (8.48 ± 2.63 mmol·L(-1)) groups, but not in HRpeak (194 ± 8 vs. 195 ± 8 b·min(-1)) and RPE (7.57 ± 1.15 vs. 7.42 ± 1.1), respectively. The result of this study indicates that KSAT provides excellent absolute and relative reliabilities. The KSAT can effectively distinguish karate athletes of different competitive levels. Thus, the KSAT may be suitable for field assessment of aerobic fitness of karate practitioners.
本研究旨在检验空手道有氧测试(KSAT)的绝对和相对可靠性及外部反应能力。这项研究包括 43 名男性空手道运动员,其中 19 名参加了第一项研究以确定测试-重测可靠性,而其余 40 名运动员则根据其空手道经验和练习水平选择参加第二项研究,以确定 KSAT 的外部反应能力。后者分为两组:国家级组(G(n))和地区级组(G(r))。分析表明,在最大摄氧量测试中,时间至力竭(TE)的测试-重测可靠性极高,组内相关系数 ICC(3,1) >0.90,测量误差(SEM)<5%:(3.2%)和均值差(偏差)± 95%一致性界限:-9.5 ± 78.8 秒。在测试-重测期间,最大乳酸浓度(Peak [La])(9.12 ± 2.59 与 8.05 ± 2.67 mmol·L(-1))存在显著差异(p < 0.05),但最大心率(HRpeak)和感知用力程度(RPE)(196 ± 9 与 194 ± 9 b·min(-1)和 7.6 ± 0.93 与 7.8 ± 1.15)没有差异(p > 0.05)。国家级空手道运动员(1,032 ± 101 秒)在 KSAT 期间的 TE 表现优于地区级运动员(841 ± 134 秒)(p < 0.001)。因此,KSAT 具有良好的外部反应能力。受试者工作特征曲线下面积>0.70(0.86;95%置信区间:0.72-0.95)。在国家级(6.09 ± 1.78 mmol·L(-1))和地区级(8.48 ± 2.63 mmol·L(-1))运动员中,Peak [La]存在显著差异,但最大心率(194 ± 8 与 195 ± 8 b·min(-1))和感知用力程度(7.57 ± 1.15 与 7.42 ± 1.1)没有差异。本研究结果表明,KSAT 提供了极佳的绝对和相对可靠性。KSAT 可有效区分不同竞技水平的空手道运动员。因此,KSAT 可能适合空手道运动员有氧适能的现场评估。