Department of Human Movement Science & Athletic Training, Institute of Sports Sciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Dec;26(12):3243-61. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824ede62.
It is unclear if increases in 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in quarter squats result in higher gains compared with full depth squats in isometric force production and vertical jump performance. The aim of the research projects was to compare the effects of different squat variants on the development of 1RM and their transfer effects to Countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) height, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and maximal rate of force development (MRFD). Twenty-three women and 36 men (mean age: 24.11 ± 2.88 years) were parallelized into 3 groups based on their CMJ height: deep front squats (FSQ, n = 20), deep back squats (BSQ, n = 20), and quarter back squats (BSQ¼, n = 19). In addition, a control group (C, n = 16) existed (mean age: 24.38 ± 0.50 years). Experimental groups trained 2 d·wk for 10 weeks with a strength-power block periodization, which produced significant (p ≤ 0.05) gains of the specific squat 1RM. The FSQ and BSQ attained significant (p ≤ 0.05) elevations in SJ and CMJ without any interaction effects between both groups (p ≥ 0.05). The BSQ¼ and C did not reveal any significant changes of SJ and CMJ. The FSQ and BSQ had significantly higher SJ scores over C (p ≤ 0.05). The BSQ did not feature any significant group difference to BSQ¼ (p = 0.116) in SJ, whereas FSQ showed a trend toward higher SJ heights over BSQ¼ (p = 0.052). The FSQ and BSQ presented significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher CMJ heights over BSQ¼ and C. Posttest in MVC and MRFD demonstrated no significant changes for BSQ. Significant declines in MRFD for FSQ in the right leg (p ≤ 0.05) without any interaction effects for MVC and MRFD between both FSQ and BSQ were found. Training of BSQ¼ resulted in significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower MRFD and MVC values in contrast to FSQ and BSQ. Quarter squat training elicited significant (p ≤ 0.05) transfer losses into the isometric maximal and explosive strength behavior. These findings therefore contest the concept of superior angle-specific transfer effects. Deep front and back squats guarantee performance-enhancing transfer effects of dynamic maximal strength to dynamic speed-strength capacity of hip and knee extensors compared with quarter squats.
在等长力产生和垂直跳跃表现方面,1 次重复最大重量(1RM)的增加是否会因quarter squats 而高于全深度 squat ,目前尚不清楚。这些研究项目的目的是比较不同深蹲变体对 1RM 发展的影响,以及它们对反跳(CMJ)和深蹲跳(SJ)高度、最大自主收缩(MVC)和最大力量发展率(MRFD)的转移效应。根据 CMJ 高度,将 23 名女性和 36 名男性(平均年龄:24.11±2.88 岁)分为 3 组:深前深蹲(FSQ,n=20)、深后深蹲(BSQ,n=20)和 quarter 后深蹲(BSQ¼,n=19)。此外,还存在一个对照组(C,n=16)(平均年龄:24.38±0.50 岁)。实验组采用力量-力量块周期化训练,每周训练 2 天,共 10 周,使特定深蹲 1RM 显著(p≤0.05)增加。FSQ 和 BSQ 在 SJ 和 CMJ 中均显著升高(p≤0.05),两组之间无交互效应(p≥0.05)。BSQ¼和 C 没有显示 SJ 和 CMJ 的任何显著变化。FSQ 和 BSQ 的 SJ 得分明显高于 C(p≤0.05)。BSQ 与 BSQ¼(p=0.116)在 SJ 方面没有显著的组间差异,而 FSQ 在 SJ 方面显示出高于 BSQ¼的趋势(p=0.052)。FSQ 和 BSQ 在 CMJ 高度上明显高于 BSQ¼和 C。在 MVC 和 MRFD 的后测中,BSQ 没有显示出显著变化。FSQ 右腿的 MRFD 显著下降(p≤0.05),但在 FSQ 和 BSQ 之间,MVC 和 MRFD 没有交互效应。BSQ¼ 的训练导致 MRFD 和 MVC 值显著下降(p≤0.05),与 FSQ 和 BSQ 相比。与 quarter squats 相比,BSQ 训练引起等长最大和爆发力力量行为的显著(p≤0.05)转移损失。因此,这些发现对优越的角度特异性转移效应的概念提出了质疑。深前和后深蹲保证了动态最大力量向髋关节和膝关节伸肌的动态速度-力量能力的增强转移效应,优于 quarter squats。