Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性随机、双盲、对照临床试验,比较硬膜外注射布托啡诺加皮质类固醇与单纯皮质类固醇治疗因髓核突出导致的坐骨神经痛的效果。

A prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing epidural butorphanol plus corticosteroid with corticosteroid alone for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus.

作者信息

Maity Abhijan, Mondal Bikash Chandra, Saha Debasish, Roy Debasish Sinha

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jan;3(1):16-21. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.92302.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of up to 3 epidural butorphanol plus corticosteroid with corticosteroid alone for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial, we administered up to 3 epidural injections of either 80 mg (2 mL) of methylprednisolone acetate and 1 mg (1 mL) of butorphanol diluted with 7 mL of isotonic saline or 80 mg (2 mL) of methylprednisolone acetate diluted with 8 mL of isotonic saline by a lumbar interlaminar approach under fluoroscopic guidance to 120 patients (60 patients in each group) with sciatica due to a herniated nucleus pulposus lasting for 4 weeks to 1 year. All patients had scores higher than 30 mm on visual analog scale (VAS). Information on the use of paracetamol, intensity of pain on a VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain possible), Schober's test (cm), Straight Leg Raising test, neurologic examination assessing sensory deficits, motor deficits and reflex changes, and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire were evaluated at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after the first injection.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to baseline characteristics, withdrawals, and complication rate. Three weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after the first injection, all the outcome measures in the butorphanol plus corticosteroid group were significantly different from that of the corticosteroid group.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural butorphanol plus corticosteroid injections, as compared with corticosteroid alone injections, offered marked improvement in pain, reflex, motor and sensory deficits, and functional status and reduced the need for analgesics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I.

摘要

目的

比较多达3次硬膜外注射布托啡诺加皮质类固醇与单纯皮质类固醇治疗因髓核突出所致坐骨神经痛的疗效。

材料与方法

在一项随机、双盲对照临床试验中,我们通过腰椎椎板间入路,在透视引导下,为120例因髓核突出导致坐骨神经痛持续4周至1年的患者(每组60例),硬膜外注射多达3次80 mg(2 mL)醋酸甲泼尼龙和1 mg(1 mL)布托啡诺并用7 mL等渗盐水稀释,或80 mg(2 mL)醋酸甲泼尼龙并用8 mL等渗盐水稀释。所有患者视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分均高于30 mm。在首次注射后3周、6周和3个月,评估对乙酰氨基酚的使用情况、VAS疼痛强度(范围为0[无疼痛]至100 mm[可能的最严重疼痛])、肖伯试验(cm)、直腿抬高试验、评估感觉障碍、运动障碍和反射变化的神经学检查以及奥斯威斯利下腰痛残疾问卷。

结果

两组在基线特征、退出率和并发症发生率方面无显著差异。首次注射后3周、6周和3个月,布托啡诺加皮质类固醇组的所有结局指标与皮质类固醇组均有显著差异。

结论

与单纯注射皮质类固醇相比,硬膜外注射布托啡诺加皮质类固醇在疼痛、反射、运动和感觉障碍以及功能状态方面有显著改善,并减少了镇痛药的需求。

证据水平

治疗性I级。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Lumbar epidural injections in the treatment of sciatica.腰椎硬膜外注射治疗坐骨神经痛。
Br J Rheumatol. 1984 Feb;23(1):35-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/23.1.35.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验