Tyler Christopher W, Likova Lora T
Smith-Kettlewell Brain Imaging Center, The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute San Francisco, CA, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 8;6:8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00008. eCollection 2012.
With all the wealth of scientific activities, there remains a certain stigma associated with careers in science, as a result of the inevitable concentration on narrow specializations that are inaccessible to general understanding. Enhancement of the process of scientific learning remains a challenge, particularly in the school setting. While direct explanation seems the best approach to expedite learning any specific subject, it is well known that the ability to deeply absorb facts and concepts is greatly enhanced by placing them in a broader context of relevance to the issues of everyday life and to the larger goals of improvement of the quality of life and advancement to a more evolved society as a whole. If the sciences can be associated with areas of artistic endeavor, they may be viewed as more accessible and favorable topics of study. There is consequently an urgent need for research in the relationship between learning and experience in the arts because both art education and scientific literacy remain at an inadequate level even in economically advanced countries. The focus of this review is the concept that inspiration is an integral aspect of the artistic experience, both for the artist and for the viewer of the artwork. As an integrative response, inspiration involves not only higher cortical circuitry but its integration with the deep brain structures such as limbic system and medial frontal structures, which are understood to mediate the experience of emotions, motivational rewards, and the appreciation of the esthetic values of the impinging stimuli. In this sense, inspiration can turn almost any occupation in life into an avocation, a source of satisfaction in achieving life goals. Conversely, when inspiration is lacking, the motivation to learn, adapt, and prosper is impeded. Thus, inspiration may be viewed as a potent aspect of human experience in linking art and science.
尽管科学活动丰富多彩,但科学职业仍存在一定的污名化现象,这是由于不可避免地专注于狭窄的专业领域,而这些领域一般人难以理解。加强科学学习过程仍然是一项挑战,尤其是在学校环境中。虽然直接讲解似乎是加速学习任何特定学科的最佳方法,但众所周知,将事实和概念置于与日常生活问题以及改善生活质量和推动整个社会向更发达社会发展的更大目标相关的更广泛背景中,能极大地增强深入吸收这些内容的能力。如果科学能与艺术创作领域联系起来,它们可能会被视为更容易理解和更受欢迎的研究主题。因此,迫切需要研究艺术学习与体验之间的关系,因为即使在经济发达国家,艺术教育和科学素养水平仍不足。本综述的重点是这样一个概念,即灵感是艺术体验的一个不可或缺的方面,无论是对艺术家还是对艺术作品的观赏者来说都是如此。作为一种综合反应,灵感不仅涉及高级皮质回路,还涉及其与深部脑结构(如边缘系统和内侧额叶结构)的整合,这些结构被认为能介导情感体验、动机奖励以及对传入刺激审美价值的欣赏。从这个意义上说,灵感几乎可以将生活中的任何职业变成一种业余爱好,成为实现生活目标的满足感来源。相反,当缺乏灵感时,学习、适应和成功的动力就会受到阻碍。因此,灵感可被视为人类体验中连接艺术与科学的一个重要方面。