• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过绘图方法教授脑成像可能会提高医学生的学习效果。

Teaching brain imaging through a drawing method may improve learning in medical students.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, AP-HP, La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Charles Foix University Hospital, F-75013, Paris, France.

Sorbonne University, F-75005, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Jun;31(6):4195-4202. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07484-3. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-020-07484-3
PMID:33201281
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Brain imaging is particularly difficult to learn and to teach. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of teaching brain imaging through drawing method in medical faculty students.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, interventional, randomized, single-blind study in third-year voluntary medical students between December 2016 and June 2019. Eighty medical students received a theoretical training on brain imaging interpretation and were subsequently randomized into two groups ("teaching through drawing" and "standard teaching"). An initial evaluation was carried out to assess the students' basic level. Three teaching and training sessions were spread over 2 months in each group. One month after the third teaching session, students were evaluated by an examiner who was blind to the student's group. The same comprehensive evaluation grid has been used for the initial and final students' evaluations to give an objective score out of 20 points. Students' scores were compared between groups using the t test and effect sizes were measured using Cohen's d.

RESULTS

Students' mean age was 21.1 years old. In total, 61.3% were female. Regarding initial evaluation, scores did not differ significantly between both groups (10.1 ± 2.0 versus 9.9 ± 1.9, p = 0.65), thus confirming the homogeneity of the students' basic level. The scores obtained from the final evaluation were significantly higher for the "teaching through drawing" students than for the "standard teaching" students (14.7 ± 2.7 vs 13.2 ± 2.0, p = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides class II evidence that the method of drawing alone can improve brain imaging comprehension and analysis in medical faculty students.

KEY POINTS

• The method of drawing can improve brain imaging analysis in medical faculty students. • A large majority of students were satisfied by the method of brain imaging teaching through drawing.

摘要

目的

脑影像学的学习和教学尤其具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估通过绘图法教授医学专业学生脑影像学的效果。

方法

我们在 2016 年 12 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,对三年级志愿医学生进行了一项前瞻性、干预性、随机、单盲研究。80 名医学生接受了脑影像解读的理论培训,随后被随机分为两组(“绘图教学”组和“标准教学”组)。首先进行初始评估,以评估学生的基础水平。在每组中,为期 2 个月内进行了 3 次教学和培训课程。在第三次教学课程结束后 1 个月,由一名对学生分组情况不知情的考官对学生进行评估。为了给出 20 分制的客观分数,我们对学生的初始和最终评估使用了相同的综合评估表。使用 t 检验比较两组学生的分数,并使用 Cohen's d 测量效应大小。

结果

学生的平均年龄为 21.1 岁。共有 61.3%为女性。关于初始评估,两组学生的分数没有显著差异(10.1 ± 2.0 与 9.9 ± 1.9,p = 0.65),这证实了学生基础水平的同质性。“绘图教学”组学生的最终评估得分明显高于“标准教学”组学生(14.7 ± 2.7 与 13.2 ± 2.0,p = 0.009,Cohen's d = 0.62)。

结论

本研究提供了 II 级证据,表明单独绘图的方法可以提高医学专业学生对脑影像学的理解和分析能力。

关键点

  1. 绘图方法可以提高医学专业学生的脑影像学分析能力。

  2. 绝大多数学生对脑影像学教学的绘图方法表示满意。

相似文献

1
Teaching brain imaging through a drawing method may improve learning in medical students.通过绘图方法教授脑成像可能会提高医学生的学习效果。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jun;31(6):4195-4202. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07484-3. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Video-based, student tutor- versus faculty staff-led ultrasound course for medical students - a prospective randomized study.基于视频的,医学生学生导师与教职员工主导的超声课程 - 一项前瞻性随机研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 16;20(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02431-8.
3
Use of Simulator-Based Teaching to Improve Medical Students' Knowledge and Competencies: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于模拟器的教学对医学生知识和能力的提升:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 24;20(9):e261. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9634.
4
A Hands-On Organ-Slicing Activity to Teach the Cross-Sectional Anatomy.动手切片器官教学活动:介绍横截面解剖学。
Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Nov;13(6):732-742. doi: 10.1002/ase.1947. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
5
Effects of "minimally invasive curricular surgery" - a pilot intervention study to improve the quality of bedside teaching in medical education.微创课程手术对改善医学教育床旁教学质量的影响:一项试点干预研究。
Med Teach. 2009 Sep;31(9):e425-30. doi: 10.1080/01421590902845865.
6
Comparison of Lecture-Based Learning vs Discussion-Based Learning in Undergraduate Medical Students.本科医学生基于讲座的学习与基于讨论的学习之比较
J Surg Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;73(2):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
7
Students' memorization of anatomy, influence of drawing.学生对解剖学的记忆,绘图的影响。
Morphologie. 2016 Mar;100(328):2-6. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2015.11.001. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
8
Teaching critical appraisal to large classes of undergraduate medical students using team-based learning versus group discussions: a randomized controlled trial.运用基于团队的学习与小组讨论对大量本科医学生进行批判性思维评估教学:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03145-9.
9
A new age approach to an age old problem: using simulation to teach geriatric medicine to medical students.一种解决古老问题的新时代方法:利用模拟向医学生教授老年医学。
Age Ageing. 2014 May;43(3):424-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft200. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
10
Involvement in teaching improves learning in medical students: a randomized cross-over study.参与教学能提高医学生的学习效果:一项随机交叉研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Aug 25;9:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Illustrator-anatomist-clinician triad based pedagogical model in anatomy education: An auxiliary resource amidst lack of hands-on human dissection.解剖学教育中基于插画师-解剖学家-临床医生三元组的教学模式:在缺乏人体实操解剖情况下的一种辅助资源。
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Apr;18(4):386-405. doi: 10.1002/ase.70018. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
Evaluating the efficacy of sequential cross-sectional scanning and combined teaching methods for prenatal screening of fetal conotruncal anomalies.评估序贯横断面扫描及联合教学方法用于胎儿圆锥动脉干畸形产前筛查的效果。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 25;24(1):1527. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06555-z.
3
Scoping Review: Innovations in Clinical Neurology Education.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Traditional and Web-Based Medical Student Teaching by Radiology Residents.传统与基于网络的放射科住院医师医学实习生教学比较。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Apr;16(4 Pt A):492-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.048. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
2
How Haptics and Drawing Enhance the Learning of Anatomy.触觉和绘图如何增强解剖学的学习。
Anat Sci Educ. 2019 Mar;12(2):164-172. doi: 10.1002/ase.1807. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review.神经解剖学教育的工具和资源:系统评价。
综述:临床神经学教育的创新
Neurol Educ. 2023 Feb 21;2(1):e200048. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200048. eCollection 2023 Mar.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 3;18(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1210-6.
4
The use and effectiveness of interactive progressive drawing in anatomy education.交互式渐进式绘图在解剖学教育中的应用和有效性。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;11(5):445-460. doi: 10.1002/ase.1784. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Critical Analysis of an e-Learning and Interactive Teaching Module with Respect to the Interpretation of Emergency Computed Tomography of the Brain.关于脑部急诊计算机断层扫描解读的电子学习与互动教学模块的批判性分析
Rofo. 2018 Apr;190(4):334-340. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124191. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Review of Simulation Training in Interventional Radiology.介入放射学模拟培训述评。
Acad Radiol. 2018 Apr;25(4):529-539. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Measuring learning gain: Comparing anatomy drawing screencasts and paper-based resources.测量学习增益:比较解剖绘图录屏和纸质资源。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jul;10(4):307-316. doi: 10.1002/ase.1666. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
8
Flipping Radiology Education Right Side Up.翻转放射学教育,使其回归正轨。
Acad Radiol. 2016 Jul;23(7):810-22. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
Actual drawing of histological images improves knowledge retention.组织学图像的实际绘制有助于提高知识留存率。
Anat Sci Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):60-70. doi: 10.1002/ase.1545. Epub 2015 May 29.
10
Development and assessment of a new 3D neuroanatomy teaching tool for MRI training.一种用于MRI培训的新型3D神经解剖学教学工具的开发与评估。
Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):502-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.1509. Epub 2015 Jan 8.