Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jan;16(1):136-45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000183. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
Household food access remains a concern among primarily agricultural households in lower- and middle-income countries. We examined the associations among domains representing livelihood assets (human capital, social capital, natural capital, physical capital and financial capital) and household food access.
Cross-sectional survey (two questionnaires) on livelihood assets.
Metropolitan Pillaro, Ecuador; Cochabamba, Bolivia; and Huancayo, Peru.
Households (n = 570) involved in small-scale agricultural production in 2008.
Food access, defined as the number of months of adequate food provisioning in the previous year, was relatively good; 41 % of the respondents indicated to have had no difficulty in obtaining food for their household in the past year. Using bivariate analysis, key livelihood assets indicators associated with better household food access were identified as: age of household survey respondent (P = 0.05), participation in agricultural associations (P = 0.09), church membership (P = 0.08), area of irrigated land (P = 0.08), housing material (P = 0.06), space within the household residence (P = 0.02) and satisfaction with health status (P = 0.02). In path models both direct and indirect effects were observed, underscoring the complexity of the relationships between livelihood assets and household food access. Paths significantly associated with better household food access included: better housing conditions (P = 0.01), more space within the household residence (P = 0.001) and greater satisfaction with health status (P = 0.001).
Multiple factors were associated with household food access in these peri-urban agricultural households. Food security intervention programmes focusing on food access need to deal with both agricultural factors and determinants of health to bolster household food security in challenging lower- and middle-income country contexts.
在中低收入国家,主要以农业为生计的家庭仍然面临着获取家庭食物的困难。本研究旨在探讨生计资产(人力资本、社会资本、自然资本、物质资本和金融资本)各领域与家庭食物获取之间的关联。
关于生计资产的横断面调查(两份问卷)。
厄瓜多尔大都市皮拉罗;玻利维亚科恰班巴;秘鲁万卡约。
2008 年参与小规模农业生产的家庭(n=570)。
以过去一年中家庭获得足够食物的月份数来定义家庭食物获取,结果显示这一指标相对较好;41%的受访者表示过去一年中家庭没有在食物获取方面遇到困难。使用双变量分析,与家庭食物获取较好相关的关键生计资产指标包括:家庭调查对象的年龄(P=0.05)、参与农业协会(P=0.09)、教会成员身份(P=0.08)、灌溉土地面积(P=0.08)、住房材料(P=0.06)、家庭住宅内的空间(P=0.02)和对健康状况的满意度(P=0.02)。在路径模型中观察到直接和间接效应,突出了生计资产与家庭食物获取之间关系的复杂性。与家庭食物获取呈正相关的路径包括:更好的住房条件(P=0.01)、家庭住宅内更多的空间(P=0.001)和对健康状况更满意(P=0.001)。
在这些城郊农业家庭中,多种因素与家庭食物获取相关。在中低收入国家具有挑战性的背景下,关注家庭食物获取的粮食安全干预项目需要同时考虑农业因素和健康决定因素,以加强家庭粮食安全。