Suppr超能文献

在典型发育和自闭症谱系障碍中,对 wh-问题的理解先于其产生。

Comprehension of wh-questions precedes their production in typical development and autism spectrum disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-1020, USA.

出版信息

Autism Res. 2012 Apr;5(2):109-23. doi: 10.1002/aur.1220. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Abstract

Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) rarely produce wh-questions (e.g. "What hit the book?") in naturalistic speech. It is unclear if this is due to social-pragmatic difficulties, or if grammatical deficits are also involved. If grammar is impaired, production of wh-questions by rote memorization might precede comprehension of similar forms. In a longitudinal study, 15 children with ASD and 18 initially language-matched typically developing (TD) toddlers were visited in their homes at 4-month intervals across a 3-year period. The wh-question task was presented via intermodal preferential looking. Silent "hitting" events (e.g. an apple hitting a flower) were followed by test trials in which the apple and flower were juxtaposed on the screen. During test trials, subject-wh- and object-wh-question audios were sequentially presented (e.g. "What hit the flower?" or "What did the apple hit?"). Control audios were also presented (e.g. "Where's the apple/flower?"). Children's eye movements were coded off-line, frame by frame. To show reliable comprehension, children should look longer to the named item (i.e. apple or flower) during the "where" questions but less at the named item during the subject-wh and object-wh-questions. To compare comprehension to production, we coded 30-min spontaneous speech samples drawn from mother-child interactions at each visit. Results indicated that comprehension of subject- and object-wh-questions was delayed in children with ASD compared with age-matched TD children, but not when matched on overall language levels. Additionally, both groups comprehended wh-questions before producing similar forms, indicating that development occurred in a similar manner. This paper discusses the implications of our findings for language acquisition in ASD.

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童在自然语言中很少产生 wh-疑问句(例如“什么打在书上?”)。目前尚不清楚这是由于社交语用困难,还是语法缺陷也参与其中。如果语法受损,通过死记硬背来产生 wh-疑问句可能先于对类似形式的理解。在一项纵向研究中,对 15 名 ASD 儿童和 18 名最初语言匹配的典型发育(TD)幼儿进行了研究,他们在三年内每隔 4 个月在家中接受访问。通过视听偏好测试呈现 wh-疑问句任务。无声的“击打”事件(例如,苹果击打花朵)之后是测试试验,其中苹果和花朵并列在屏幕上。在测试试验中,相继呈现主语 wh-和宾语 wh-问题音频(例如“什么打在花上?”或“苹果打了什么?”)。也呈现控制音频(例如“苹果/花在哪里?”)。孩子的眼动通过离线、逐帧进行编码。为了显示可靠的理解,当孩子在“哪里”问题中应更长时间地注视所命名的项目(即苹果或花朵),但在主语 wh-和宾语 wh-问题中注视所命名的项目的时间应更少。为了将理解与产生进行比较,我们从每次访问时母子互动中抽取了 30 分钟的自发语言样本进行编码。结果表明,与年龄匹配的 TD 儿童相比,ASD 儿童对主语和宾语 wh-疑问句的理解延迟,但与整体语言水平匹配时则不然。此外,两组儿童在产生类似形式之前都理解了 wh-疑问句,这表明发展方式相似。本文讨论了我们的发现对 ASD 语言习得的意义。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
The State of Natural Language Sampling in Autism Research: A Scoping Review.自闭症研究中的自然语言抽样状况:一项范围综述
Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2025 May 23;10:23969415251341247. doi: 10.1177/23969415251341247. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

7
Grammaticality judgments in autism: deviance or delay.自闭症中的语法判断:异常还是延迟。
J Child Lang. 2009 Nov;36(5):999-1021. doi: 10.1017/S0305000909009362. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
10
Beyond pragmatics: morphosyntactic development in autism.超越语用学:自闭症的形态句法发展
J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Jul;37(6):1007-23. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0239-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验