Bastid C, Sahel J, Filho M, Sarles H
Clinique des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif et de la Nutrition, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France.
Pancreas. 1990 Sep;5(5):524-7. doi: 10.1097/00006676-199009000-00005.
The aim of this study was to compare the diameter of the main pancreatic duct measured by ultrasonography (US) and endoscopic pancreatography (ERCP) in cases of chronic pancreatitis and to evaluate the ability of US to gauge the dilation of the main duct accurately enough to do a side-to-side wirsungo-jejunostomy. Sixty-one measurements were recorded in 50 patients (47 men and 3 women; age: 43.7 +/- 10 years). In 11 cases, two measurements were made at an interval of more than one year. US always preceded ERCP. The measurements were compared in only 43 cases (71%), because evaluation by US was inaccurate in 14 cases (23%) and by ERCP in nine cases (15%). The mean value of the diameter measured by US was 4.30 +/- 3.01 mm, and by ERCP, 5.52 +/- 3.08 mm (mean +/- SD). When the diameter assessed by US (y) was greater than or equal to 3 mm, the diameter assessed by ERCP (x) was always greater than or equal to 4 mm. The value of x could be determined from y by the equation: x = y + 1.2 mm (r = 0.91, p less than 0.05) The difference between x and y was constant and did not depend on the size of the duct. It could be owing to the hyperechogenicity of the duct walls. We conclude that US is a reliable way to assess the dilation of the main pancreatic duct and might be an acceptable method of judging whether a side-to-side wirsungo-jejunostomy can be performed.
本研究的目的是比较超声检查(US)和内镜胰胆管造影(ERCP)测量慢性胰腺炎患者主胰管直径的情况,并评估US测量主胰管扩张程度的准确性,以确定能否进行侧侧胰管空肠吻合术。对50例患者(47例男性,3例女性;年龄:43.7±10岁)进行了61次测量。其中11例在间隔一年以上进行了两次测量。US检查总是先于ERCP检查。仅对43例(71%)的测量结果进行了比较,因为14例(23%)的US评估不准确,9例(15%)的ERCP评估不准确。US测量的直径平均值为4.30±3.01mm,ERCP测量的直径平均值为5.52±3.08mm(平均值±标准差)。当US评估的直径(y)大于或等于3mm时,ERCP评估的直径(x)总是大于或等于4mm。x值可由方程x = y + 1.2mm从y值确定(r = 0.91,p < 0.05)。x与y之间的差异是恒定的,且不取决于导管的大小。这可能是由于导管壁的高回声性所致。我们得出结论,US是评估主胰管扩张的可靠方法,可能是判断能否进行侧侧胰管空肠吻合术的可接受方法。