• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我独自站立。”一部关于养老院中一位服务对象与专业人员之间(无)联系的民族志戏剧。

"I stand alone." An ethnodrama about the (dis)connections between a client and professionals in a residential care home.

作者信息

Baur Vivianne, Abma Tineke, Baart Ingrid

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherland,

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2014 Sep;22(3):272-91. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0203-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-012-0203-6
PMID:22361817
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4124255/
Abstract

Client participation in elderly care organizations requires shifting traditional power relations and establishing communicative action that involves the lifeworlds of clients and professionals alike. This article describes a particular form of client participation in which one client was part of a team of professionals in a residential care home. Their joint remit was to plan the implementation of a new personal care file for residents. We describe the interactions within this team through an ethnodrama, based on participant observations and the embodied presence of the researcher (first author). The narratives and voices of all team members are dramatized in this ethnodrama. Throughout the project the team members experienced confusion relating to the confrontation between lifeworld and system, as experienced by the client and professionals in the team. We analyze these tensions by making use of a Habermasian theoretical framework. We conclude that forms for collective client participation in residential care homes should be developed based on communicative action between clients and professionals, with room for emotional engagement.

摘要

老年人护理机构中的客户参与需要转变传统的权力关系,并建立涉及客户和专业人员生活世界的交往行动。本文描述了一种特殊形式的客户参与,其中一名客户是一家养老院专业团队的一员。他们的共同职责是为居民规划实施新的个人护理档案。我们通过一部民族志戏剧来描述这个团队内部的互动,这部戏剧基于参与观察以及研究者(第一作者)的亲身参与。所有团队成员的叙述和声音都在这部民族志戏剧中得以展现。在整个项目过程中,团队成员都经历了与生活世界和系统之间的冲突相关的困惑,这是团队中的客户和专业人员都体验到的。我们利用哈贝马斯的理论框架来分析这些紧张关系。我们得出结论,应基于客户与专业人员之间的交往行动,并为情感投入留出空间,来发展集体客户参与养老院护理的形式。

相似文献

1
"I stand alone." An ethnodrama about the (dis)connections between a client and professionals in a residential care home.“我独自站立。”一部关于养老院中一位服务对象与专业人员之间(无)联系的民族志戏剧。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Sep;22(3):272-91. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0203-6.
2
Client-nurse relationships in home-based palliative care: a critical analysis of power relations.居家姑息治疗中的医患关系:权力关系的批判性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Aug;16(8):1435-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01720.x.
3
Mutual powerlessness in client participation practices in mental health care.在心理健康护理中,客户参与实践中的相互无力感。
Health Expect. 2014 Apr;17(2):208-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00748.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
4
Seeking connections, creating movement: the power of altruistic action.寻求联系,创造行动:利他行为的力量。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Dec;22(4):366-84. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0222-3.
5
User involvement in long-term care. Towards a relational care-ethics approach.用户参与长期护理。迈向关系性护理伦理方法。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2328-39. doi: 10.1111/hex.12202. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
6
Participation and power in care: exploring the "client" in client engagement.护理中的参与和权力:探索客户参与中的“客户”
J Aging Stud. 2014 Dec;31:119-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 4.
7
The influence of corporate structure and quality improvement activities on outcome improvement in residential care homes.企业结构和质量改进活动对养老院结果改善的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Aug;26(4):378-87. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu057. Epub 2014 May 28.
8
Development of two measures of client engagement for use in home aged care.开发两种用于居家老年护理的客户参与度测量方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 May;24(3):363-74. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12213. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
9
Speech pathologists' experience of involving people with stroke-induced aphasia in clinical decision making during rehabilitation.言语病理学家让中风后失语症患者参与康复临床决策的经验。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):870-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1066453. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
The measure and discuss intervention: a procedure for client empowerment and quality control in residential care homes.
Gerontologist. 1997 Dec;37(6):817-22. doi: 10.1093/geront/37.6.817.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.影响老年护理创新实施的因素:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Dec 29;22(1):61-80. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.
2
It takes three to tango: An ethnography of triadic involvement of residents, families and nurses in long-term dementia care.需要三个人跳探戈舞:居民、家庭和护士三方参与长期痴呆症护理的民族志。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):80-90. doi: 10.1111/hex.13224. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
3
(Un)bridgeable Chasms?: Doctor-Patient Interactions in Select Graphic Medical Narratives.(无法)弥合的鸿沟?:精选图文并茂的医学叙事中的医患互动
J Med Humanit. 2019 Dec;40(4):591-605. doi: 10.1007/s10912-018-9528-y.
4
User involvement in long-term care. Towards a relational care-ethics approach.用户参与长期护理。迈向关系性护理伦理方法。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2328-39. doi: 10.1111/hex.12202. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team.合作与共同拥有研究成果:研究团队中患者研究伙伴与专业研究人员之间的动态与对话。
Health Expect. 2012 Sep;15(3):242-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
2
Developing voice and empowerment: the first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting.发展声音和赋权:广泛参与研究议程制定的第一步。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Apr;55(4):411-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01388.x. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
3
Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.患者参与作为对话:设定研究议程。
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):160-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x.
4
Participation of marginalized groups in evaluation: mission impossible?边缘化群体参与评估:不可能完成的任务?
Eval Program Plann. 2010 Aug;33(3):238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
5
User involvement in the construction of a mental health charter: an exercise in communicative rationality?用户参与心理健康宪章的制定:是一种交往理性的实践吗?
Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):251-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00561.x.
6
Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams.患者作为响应性研究的合作伙伴:混合研究团队合作的方法学理念。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Mar;19(3):401-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732309331869.
7
'Ordinary people only': knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare.“仅面向普通人”:知识、代表性与公众参与医疗保健的群体
Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Jan;30(1):35-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x.
8
Embodied knowledge: writing researchers' bodies into qualitative health research.具身知识:将写作研究者的身体纳入质性健康研究
Qual Health Res. 2006 Feb;16(2):298-310. doi: 10.1177/1049732305281944.
9
Influencing the national policy process: the role of health consumer groups.影响国家政策进程:健康消费者群体的作用。
Health Expect. 2004 Mar;7(1):18-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00238.x.
10
Frail bodies, courageous voices: older people influencing community care.
Health Soc Care Community. 1998 Mar;6(2):102-111. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.1998.00105.x.