Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, EMGO Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Expect. 2012 Sep;15(3):242-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
Different strategies by which patients can be involved in research include consultation, control and collaboration. This article focuses on collaboration within research teams and considers this with reference to a research project about setting a social-scientific agenda for health research from the perspectives of patients with a chronic kidney disease (CKD).
To examine the dynamics and dialogues in a collaboration between patient research partners and professional researchers.
A responsive methodology was used in the research project. Two patient research partners participated in the research team. Twenty-seven patients with CKD and parents of young children with CKD were interviewed, seven focus groups were organized and observations were held at a dialysis centre.
During the collaboration, the research partners and professional researchers engaged in a mutual learning process in all stages of the project. The professional researchers gave the research partners a sense of ownership in the research process. The research partners could relate to the lives of patients by using their experiential knowledge. In the context of collaborative working, this helped shape an agenda for research.
The active involvement of patients as research partners can add value to a research strategy, especially when research partners and professional researchers engage in a dialogue that is open, inclusive and deliberative. Issues for discussion include the possibility of 'over-involvement', the research profile and training of research partners and whether participation of patients is restricted to certain types of research.
患者参与研究的不同策略包括咨询、控制和协作。本文重点关注研究团队内的协作,并参考了一个关于从慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 患者的角度为健康研究制定社会科学议程的研究项目。
研究患者研究伙伴和专业研究人员之间的协作的动态和对话。
该研究项目采用了响应式方法。两名患者研究伙伴参与了研究小组。对 27 名慢性肾脏病患者和患有慢性肾脏病的幼儿的父母进行了访谈,组织了 7 个焦点小组,并在透析中心进行了观察。
在协作过程中,研究伙伴和专业研究人员在项目的所有阶段都进行了相互学习。专业研究人员让研究伙伴在研究过程中拥有所有权。研究伙伴可以通过使用他们的经验知识来理解患者的生活。在协作工作的背景下,这有助于为研究制定议程。
让患者作为研究伙伴积极参与可以为研究策略增加价值,特别是当研究伙伴和专业研究人员进行开放、包容和深思熟虑的对话时。需要讨论的问题包括“过度参与”的可能性、研究伙伴的研究概况和培训,以及患者的参与是否仅限于某些类型的研究。