• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team.合作与共同拥有研究成果:研究团队中患者研究伙伴与专业研究人员之间的动态与对话。
Health Expect. 2012 Sep;15(3):242-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
2
Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams.患者作为响应性研究的合作伙伴:混合研究团队合作的方法学理念。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Mar;19(3):401-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732309331869.
3
The dynamic nature of patient engagement within a Canadian patient-oriented kidney health research network: Perspectives of researchers and patient partners.加拿大以患者为导向的肾脏健康研究网络中患者参与的动态性质:研究人员和患者伙伴的观点。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):905-918. doi: 10.1111/hex.13716. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
5
Moving beyond project-specific patient and public involvement in research.超越特定项目中的患者及公众参与研究。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Jan;113(1):16-23. doi: 10.1177/0141076819890551.
6
Transcending differences to study the transcendent: an exploratory study of researchers' and chaplains' reflections on interdisciplinary spiritual care research collaboration.超越差异以研究卓越之事:一项关于研究人员和牧师对跨学科精神护理研究合作反思的探索性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Apr 18;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0004-4.
7
Wise owls and professors: the role of older researchers in the review of the National Service Framework for Older People.睿智的猫头鹰与教授们:老年研究者在《老年人国家服务框架》审查中的作用。
Health Expect. 2008 Dec;11(4):409-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00513.x.
8
Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.患者参与作为对话:设定研究议程。
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):160-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x.
9
How to strengthen societal impact of research and innovation? Lessons learned from an explanatory research-on-research study on participatory knowledge infrastructures funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.如何增强研究和创新的社会影响力?从荷兰健康研究与发展组织资助的一项关于参与式知识基础设施的研究性研究中获得的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 8;22(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01175-x.
10
Patient involvement in research programming and implementation: A responsive evaluation of the Dialogue Model for research agenda setting.患者参与研究规划与实施:对研究议程设定对话模型的响应性评估
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2449-64. doi: 10.1111/hex.12213. Epub 2014 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of project management methodologies in microbiology research laboratories.微生物学研究实验室中项目管理方法的实施
Access Microbiol. 2025 Aug 19;7(8). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.001032.v3. eCollection 2025.
2
Systematic Review of Patient and Caregiver Involvement in CKD Research.关于患者及照护者参与慢性肾脏病研究的系统评价
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 Mar 17;10(6):1657-1672. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.03.018. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Co-creating tools for embedding meaningful patient and public involvement and engagement in real-world data and evidence research in the pharmaceutical industry setting: a multistakeholder participatory co-design study.共同创建工具,以在制药行业环境中切实将患者和公众参与及融入真实世界数据与证据研究:一项多利益相关方参与式协同设计研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 17;15(2):e088914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088914.
4
Roles, outcomes, and enablers within research partnerships: A rapid review of the literature on patient and public involvement and engagement in health research.研究伙伴关系中的角色、成果与促进因素:关于患者及公众参与健康研究的文献快速综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 15;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00448-z.
5
Perspectives of underweight people with eating disorders on receiving Imagery Rescripting trauma treatment: a qualitative study of their experiences.饮食失调的体重过轻人群接受意象重写创伤治疗的观点:对其经历的定性研究
J Eat Disord. 2022 Nov 30;10(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00712-9.
6
Sarcoidosis: Updates on therapeutic drug trials and novel treatment approaches.结节病:治疗药物试验及新治疗方法的最新进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 12;9:991783. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.991783. eCollection 2022.
7
Patient involvement in basic rheumatology research at Nijmegen: a three year's responsive evaluation of added value, pitfalls and conditions for success.奈梅亨患者参与基础风湿病学研究:对附加值、陷阱及成功条件的三年响应性评估
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Oct 7;6(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00296-6.
8
What Patients Prioritize for Research to Improve Their Lives and How Their Priorities Get Dismissed again.患者重视哪些能改善其生活的研究,以及他们的这些优先事项为何一再被忽视。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 9;19(4):1927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041927.
9
Ground-Truthing the Experiences of Homeless Older Adults' Recent Stays with Family and Friends: A Case Study of Participatory Data Analysis.实地调查无家可归的老年人最近与家人和朋友居住的经历:参与式数据分析案例研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(1):268-285. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0020.
10
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.患者参与作为对话:设定研究议程。
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):160-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x.
2
Polycystic kidney disease.多囊肾病
BMJ. 2009 May 11;338:b1595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1595.
3
Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams.患者作为响应性研究的合作伙伴:混合研究团队合作的方法学理念。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Mar;19(3):401-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732309331869.
4
Developing theory from complexity: reflections on a collaborative mixed method participatory action research study.从复杂性中发展理论:对一项合作性混合方法参与式行动研究的思考
Qual Health Res. 2008 May;18(5):701-17. doi: 10.1177/1049732308316531.
5
Advice to use topical or oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain in older people: randomised controlled trial and patient preference study.针对老年人慢性膝关节疼痛使用外用或口服布洛芬的建议:随机对照试验和患者偏好研究。
BMJ. 2008 Jan 19;336(7636):138-42. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39399.656331.25. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
6
Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia.访谈痴呆症患者时的伦理和方法学问题。
Nurs Ethics. 2007 Sep;14(5):608-19. doi: 10.1177/0969733007080206.
7
User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts.用户参与研究申请的制定:障碍、促进因素及影响
Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):173-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00436.x.
8
Patient perspective: fatigue as a recommended patient centered outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis.患者视角:疲劳作为类风湿关节炎中一项推荐的以患者为中心的结局指标。
J Rheumatol. 2007 May;34(5):1174-7.
9
The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: findings from a modified nominal group study.英国癌症治疗中心患者的研究重点:一项改良名义小组研究的结果
Br J Cancer. 2007 Mar 26;96(6):875-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603662. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
10
How to involve cancer patients at the end of life as co-researchers.如何让临终癌症患者作为共同研究者参与其中。
Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;20(8):821-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216306073110.

合作与共同拥有研究成果:研究团队中患者研究伙伴与专业研究人员之间的动态与对话。

Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team.

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, EMGO Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2012 Sep;15(3):242-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00661.x
PMID:21332617
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060620/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different strategies by which patients can be involved in research include consultation, control and collaboration. This article focuses on collaboration within research teams and considers this with reference to a research project about setting a social-scientific agenda for health research from the perspectives of patients with a chronic kidney disease (CKD).

OBJECTIVE

To examine the dynamics and dialogues in a collaboration between patient research partners and professional researchers.

DESIGN

A responsive methodology was used in the research project. Two patient research partners participated in the research team. Twenty-seven patients with CKD and parents of young children with CKD were interviewed, seven focus groups were organized and observations were held at a dialysis centre.

RESULTS

During the collaboration, the research partners and professional researchers engaged in a mutual learning process in all stages of the project. The professional researchers gave the research partners a sense of ownership in the research process. The research partners could relate to the lives of patients by using their experiential knowledge. In the context of collaborative working, this helped shape an agenda for research.

CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

The active involvement of patients as research partners can add value to a research strategy, especially when research partners and professional researchers engage in a dialogue that is open, inclusive and deliberative. Issues for discussion include the possibility of 'over-involvement', the research profile and training of research partners and whether participation of patients is restricted to certain types of research.

摘要

背景

患者参与研究的不同策略包括咨询、控制和协作。本文重点关注研究团队内的协作,并参考了一个关于从慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 患者的角度为健康研究制定社会科学议程的研究项目。

目的

研究患者研究伙伴和专业研究人员之间的协作的动态和对话。

设计

该研究项目采用了响应式方法。两名患者研究伙伴参与了研究小组。对 27 名慢性肾脏病患者和患有慢性肾脏病的幼儿的父母进行了访谈,组织了 7 个焦点小组,并在透析中心进行了观察。

结果

在协作过程中,研究伙伴和专业研究人员在项目的所有阶段都进行了相互学习。专业研究人员让研究伙伴在研究过程中拥有所有权。研究伙伴可以通过使用他们的经验知识来理解患者的生活。在协作工作的背景下,这有助于为研究制定议程。

结论和讨论

让患者作为研究伙伴积极参与可以为研究策略增加价值,特别是当研究伙伴和专业研究人员进行开放、包容和深思熟虑的对话时。需要讨论的问题包括“过度参与”的可能性、研究伙伴的研究概况和培训,以及患者的参与是否仅限于某些类型的研究。