• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AH-26与四种新型根管封闭剂的四周溶解性评估

A four-week solubility assessment of AH-26 and four new root canal sealers.

作者信息

Azadi Niloofar, Fallahdoost Arzhang, Mehrvarzfar Payman, Rakhshan Hamid, Rakhshan Vahid

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå International School of Public Health, Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jan;9(1):31-5. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.92924.

DOI:10.4103/1735-3327.92924
PMID:22363360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3283975/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The strong link between sealer solubility and periapical reinfection indicates that water solubility of new sealers should be studied. This study aimed to assess the water solubility of five root canal sealers (AH-26, Topseal, 2-Seal, Acroseal, and Roeko Seal Automix [RSA]).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this in vitro experimental study, 30 specimens were fabricated from each of the abovementioned sealants. Then they were weighed and randomly divided into three subgroups of 10 each (A, B, and C). They were set at 37°C and 100% RH, in accordance with ANSI/ADA 57 and ISO 6876-2001 requirements. Afterward, the specimens in subgroups A were incubated at 37°C and 100% RH for 24 hours, while the specimens in the subgroups B and C were incubated in the same conditions for 7 days and 28 days, respectively. After incubation, the specimens were dried with blotting paper and were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C and 0% RH. Then they were weighed. The percentage of weight loss was regarded as water solubility.

RESULTS

The mean solubility of the sealers AH-26, Acroseal, Topseal, 2-Seal, and RSA were 0.28%, 0.36%, 0.07%, 0.037%, and 0.141% after 24 hours, respectively. After 28 days, their solubility were 1.75%, 0.746%, 0.082%, 0.04%, and 0.517%, respectively. Only the solubility of the sealers 2-Seal and Topseal were not statistically different (P>0.3 [Tukey's]). Again only the solubility of 2-Seal and Topseal did not significantly increase between the 7(th) day and the 28(th) day of incubation (P>0.6 [paired-samples t]).

CONCLUSION

All tested materials met the standards (maximum weight loss of 3% within 24 hours). However, the results of 2-Seal followed by Topseal were the most favorable ones.

摘要

背景

封闭剂溶解度与根尖周再感染之间的紧密联系表明,应研究新型封闭剂的水溶性。本研究旨在评估五种根管封闭剂(AH-26、Topseal、2-Seal、Acroseal和Roeko Seal Automix [RSA])的水溶性。

材料与方法

在这项体外实验研究中,从上述每种封闭剂制备30个样本。然后对它们进行称重,并随机分为三个亚组,每组10个(A、B和C)。根据ANSI/ADA 57和ISO 6876-2001要求,将它们置于37°C和100%相对湿度环境中。之后,A亚组的样本在37°C和100%相对湿度下孵育24小时,而B亚组和C亚组的样本分别在相同条件下孵育7天和28天。孵育后,用吸水纸将样本擦干,并在37°C和0%相对湿度下孵育24小时。然后对它们进行称重。重量损失百分比被视为水溶性。

结果

24小时后,AH-26、Acroseal、Topseal、2-Seal和RSA封闭剂的平均溶解度分别为0.28%、0.36%、0.07%、0.037%和0.141%。28天后,它们的溶解度分别为1.75%、0.746%、0.082%、0.04%和0.517%。只有2-Seal和Topseal封闭剂的溶解度在统计学上无差异(P>0.3 [Tukey检验])。同样,只有2-Seal和Topseal封闭剂的溶解度在孵育第7天和第28天之间没有显著增加(P>0.6 [配对样本t检验])。

结论

所有测试材料均符合标准(24小时内最大重量损失为3%)。然而,2-Seal其次是Topseal的结果是最有利的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b00f/3283975/ac91b2893bfb/DRJ-9-31-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b00f/3283975/ac91b2893bfb/DRJ-9-31-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b00f/3283975/ac91b2893bfb/DRJ-9-31-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A four-week solubility assessment of AH-26 and four new root canal sealers.AH-26与四种新型根管封闭剂的四周溶解性评估
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jan;9(1):31-5. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.92924.
2
Solubility of root canal sealers: a comparative study.根管封闭剂的溶解度:一项对比研究。
Int J Artif Organs. 2010 Sep;33(9):676-81. doi: 10.1177/039139881003300914.
3
Water uptake and solubility of Acroseal sealer in comparison with Apexit and AH Plus sealers in Hank's solution.
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2011 Sep-Oct;139(9-10):579-82.
4
Physicochemical properties of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers.基于甲基丙烯酸树脂的根管封闭剂的理化性能。
J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 Jul 4.
5
Effect of immersion in distilled water or phosphate-buffered saline on the solubility, volumetric change and presence of voids within new calcium silicate-based root canal sealers.蒸馏水或磷酸盐缓冲液浸泡对新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的溶解度、体积变化和空隙存在的影响。
Int Endod J. 2020 Mar;53(3):385-391. doi: 10.1111/iej.13225. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
6
A comparative assessment of the antibacterial activity of root canal sealers on 2 Actinomyces species: An in vitro study.两种放线菌的根管封闭剂抗菌活性的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019 Feb;28(2):243-248. doi: 10.17219/acem/78022.
7
Physicochemical properties of endodontic sealers of different bases.不同基底的根管封闭剂的理化性能。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Jul-Aug;20(4):455-61. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000400011.
8
A comparative study of selected physical properties of five root-canal sealers.五种根管封闭剂选定物理性能的比较研究。
Int Endod J. 2003 Sep;36(9):629-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00701.x.
9
Solubility and apical sealing characteristics of a new calcium silicate-based root canal sealer in comparison to calcium hydroxide-, methacrylate resin- and epoxy resin-based sealers.一种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的溶解性和顶端密封性与氢氧化钙、甲基丙烯酸树脂和环氧树脂基封闭剂的比较。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 May-Jul;71(3-4):857-62. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.734410. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
10
Evaluation of physicochemical properties of four root canal sealers.四种根管封闭剂的理化性能评价。
Int Endod J. 2011 Feb;44(2):126-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01815.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Physical Properties of Three Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: An In-Vitro Study.三种树脂类根管封闭剂物理性能的比较:一项体外研究
Front Dent. 2023 Sep 19;20:34. doi: 10.18502/fid.v20i34.13651. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of Sealing Abilities Among Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root-Canal Filling Cement, Antibacterial Bioceramic Paste, and Epoxy Resin, using Enterococcus faecalis as a Microbial Tracer.以粪肠球菌为微生物示踪剂比较氧化锌丁香酚根管充填水泥、抗菌生物陶瓷糊剂和环氧树脂的密封能力。
Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2022 Jun 1;28:e936319. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.936319.
3
Physicochemical Properties of Two Generations of MTA-Based Root Canal Sealers.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel urethane acrylate-based root canal sealer with improved degree of conversion, cytotoxicity, bond strengths, solubility, and dimensional stability.一种新型的基于氨酯丙烯酸酯的根管封闭剂,具有更高的转化率、更低的细胞毒性、更高的粘结强度、更低的溶解度和更好的尺寸稳定性。
J Endod. 2011 Feb;37(2):246-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.008.
2
Evaluation of physicochemical properties of four root canal sealers.四种根管封闭剂的理化性能评价。
Int Endod J. 2011 Feb;44(2):126-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01815.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
3
Dimensional alterations and solubility of new endodontic sealers.
两代基于MTA的根管封闭剂的物理化学性质
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 9;14(20):5911. doi: 10.3390/ma14205911.
4
Physical Properties and Chemical Characterization of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin Root Canal Sealers.两种实验性环氧树脂根管封闭剂的物理性质和化学特性
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):149-156. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.30.
新型根管封闭剂的尺寸变化与溶解性
Braz Dent J. 2010;21(4):301-4. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000400002.
4
Solubility of root canal sealers: a comparative study.根管封闭剂的溶解度:一项对比研究。
Int J Artif Organs. 2010 Sep;33(9):676-81. doi: 10.1177/039139881003300914.
5
A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers.AH Plus、Epiphany和Epiphany SE根管封闭剂物理化学性质的比较研究。
Int Endod J. 2009 Sep;42(9):785-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01584.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
6
Calcium hydroxide-based root canal sealers: a review.氢氧化钙类根管封闭剂:综述
J Endod. 2009 Apr;35(4):475-80. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.026. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
7
Long-term sealing ability of Pulp Canal Sealer, AH-Plus, GuttaFlow and Epiphany.牙髓根管封闭剂AH-Plus、GuttaFlow和Epiphany的长期封闭能力。
Int Endod J. 2008 Mar;41(3):219-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01343.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
8
Water sorption and solubility of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers.基于甲基丙烯酸酯树脂的根管封闭剂的吸水性和溶解性
J Endod. 2007 Aug;33(8):990-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.03.021.
9
Influence of the powder/liquid ratio on the properties of zinc oxide-eugenol-based root canal sealers.粉液比对氧化锌丁香酚类根管封闭剂性能的影响。
Dent Mater. 2004 Dec;20(10):915-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.002.
10
Solubility of root-canal sealers in water and artificial saliva.根管封闭剂在水和人工唾液中的溶解性。
Int Endod J. 2003 Oct;36(10):660-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00705.x.