Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Munich, Germany.
Indoor Air. 2012 Oct;22(5):378-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00774.x. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
To assess the effect of indoor air quality as indicated by the median carbon dioxide (CO₂) level in the classroom on the concentration performance (CP) of students, a cross-over cluster-randomized experimental study was conducted in 20 classrooms with mechanical ventilation systems. Test conditions 'worse' (median CO₂ level on average 2115 ppm) and 'better' (median CO₂ level on average 1045 ppm) were established by the regulation of the mechanical ventilation system on two days in one week each in every classroom. Concentration performance was quantified in students of grade three and four by the use of the d2-test and its primary parameter 'CP' and secondary parameters 'total number of characters processed' (TN) and 'total number of errors' (TE). 2366 d2-tests from 417 students could be used in analysis. In hierarchical linear regression accounting for repeated measurements, no significant effect of the experimental condition on CP or TN could be observed. However, TE was increased significantly by 1.65 (95% confidence interval 0.42-2.87) in 'worse' compared to 'better' condition. Thus, low air quality in classrooms as indicated by increased CO₂ levels does not reduce overall short-term CP in students, but appears to increase the error rate.
This study could not confirm that low air quality in classrooms as indicated by increased CO₂ levels reduces short-term concentration performance (CP) in students; however, it appears to affect processing accuracy negatively. To ensure a high level of accuracy, good air quality characterized, for example, by low CO₂ concentration should be maintained in classrooms.
为了评估室内空气质量(以教室中二氧化碳(CO₂)中位数水平表示)对学生浓度表现(CP)的影响,在 20 间装有机械通风系统的教室中进行了一项交叉分组随机实验研究。通过在每周的两天中调节机械通风系统,在每个教室中建立了较差(平均中位数 CO₂水平为 2115ppm)和较好(平均中位数 CO₂水平为 1045ppm)的测试条件。在三年级和四年级的学生中,使用 d2 测试及其主要参数“CP”以及次要参数“处理的字符总数(TN)”和“错误总数(TE)”来量化浓度表现。可以在分析中使用来自 417 名学生的 2366 次 d2 测试。在考虑重复测量的层次线性回归中,实验条件对 CP 或 TN 没有显著影响。然而,在较差条件下,TE 显著增加了 1.65(95%置信区间为 0.42-2.87)。因此,教室中空气质量较差(以 CO₂水平升高表示)不会降低学生的整体短期 CP,但似乎会增加错误率。
本研究无法证实教室中 CO₂水平升高所表示的低空气质量会降低学生的短期浓度表现(CP);然而,它似乎会对处理准确性产生负面影响。为了确保高准确性,应保持教室具有良好的空气质量,例如,CO₂浓度较低。