Inserm, U823, Centre de Recherche Albert Bonniot, Grenoble, France.
Respir Med. 2012 Jun;106(6):820-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
The aims were to assess 1) the relationship of asthma control assessed by combining epidemiological survey questions and lung function to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) and 2) whether individuals with controlled asthma reach similar generic HRQL levels as individuals without asthma.
The analysis included 584 individuals without asthma and 498 with asthma who participated in the follow-up of the Epidemiological study on Genetics and Environment of Asthma (EGEA). Asthma control was assessed from survey questions and lung function, closely adapted from the 2006-2009 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ, scores range:1-7) and the generic SF-36 (scores range: 0-100) were used.
Adjusted mean total AQLQ score decreased by 0.5 points for each asthma control steps (6.4, 5.9 and 5.4 for controlled, partly-controlled and uncontrolled asthma respectively, p < 0.0001). The differences in SF-36 scores between individuals with controlled asthma and those without asthma were minor and not significant for the PCS (-1, p = 0.09), borderline significant for the MCS (-1.6, p = 0.05) and small for the 8 domains (<5.1) although statistically significant for 4 domains.
These results support the discriminative properties of the proposed asthma control grading system and its use in epidemiology.
本研究旨在评估 1)通过结合流行病学调查问题和肺功能评估的哮喘控制与健康相关生活质量(HRQL)之间的关系,2)控制良好的哮喘患者是否达到与无哮喘患者相似的通用 HRQL 水平。
该分析纳入了 584 名无哮喘患者和 498 名哮喘患者,他们均参与了哮喘遗传学和环境研究(EGEA)的随访。哮喘控制通过问卷调查和肺功能评估来确定,这两个指标均根据 2006-2009 年全球哮喘倡议指南进行了调整。采用哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ,评分范围:1-7)和通用 SF-36(评分范围:0-100)进行评估。
哮喘控制每增加一个等级,AQLQ 总分平均降低 0.5 分(控制良好、部分控制和未控制哮喘患者的评分分别为 6.4、5.9 和 5.4,p < 0.0001)。控制良好的哮喘患者和无哮喘患者的 SF-36 评分之间存在差异,但差异较小且无统计学意义(PCS 评分差异为-1,p = 0.09),对于 MCS 评分差异具有边缘统计学意义(-1.6,p = 0.05),对于 8 个领域的评分差异较小(<5.1),但对于 4 个领域的评分差异具有统计学意义。
这些结果支持了所提出的哮喘控制分级系统的区分性能及其在流行病学中的应用。