Suppr超能文献

EGEA 流行病学调查评估的哮喘控制与健康相关的生活质量。

Asthma control assessed in the EGEA epidemiological survey and health-related quality of life.

机构信息

Inserm, U823, Centre de Recherche Albert Bonniot, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2012 Jun;106(6):820-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aims were to assess 1) the relationship of asthma control assessed by combining epidemiological survey questions and lung function to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) and 2) whether individuals with controlled asthma reach similar generic HRQL levels as individuals without asthma.

METHODS

The analysis included 584 individuals without asthma and 498 with asthma who participated in the follow-up of the Epidemiological study on Genetics and Environment of Asthma (EGEA). Asthma control was assessed from survey questions and lung function, closely adapted from the 2006-2009 Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ, scores range:1-7) and the generic SF-36 (scores range: 0-100) were used.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean total AQLQ score decreased by 0.5 points for each asthma control steps (6.4, 5.9 and 5.4 for controlled, partly-controlled and uncontrolled asthma respectively, p < 0.0001). The differences in SF-36 scores between individuals with controlled asthma and those without asthma were minor and not significant for the PCS (-1, p = 0.09), borderline significant for the MCS (-1.6, p = 0.05) and small for the 8 domains (<5.1) although statistically significant for 4 domains.

CONCLUSION

These results support the discriminative properties of the proposed asthma control grading system and its use in epidemiology.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估 1)通过结合流行病学调查问题和肺功能评估的哮喘控制与健康相关生活质量(HRQL)之间的关系,2)控制良好的哮喘患者是否达到与无哮喘患者相似的通用 HRQL 水平。

方法

该分析纳入了 584 名无哮喘患者和 498 名哮喘患者,他们均参与了哮喘遗传学和环境研究(EGEA)的随访。哮喘控制通过问卷调查和肺功能评估来确定,这两个指标均根据 2006-2009 年全球哮喘倡议指南进行了调整。采用哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ,评分范围:1-7)和通用 SF-36(评分范围:0-100)进行评估。

结果

哮喘控制每增加一个等级,AQLQ 总分平均降低 0.5 分(控制良好、部分控制和未控制哮喘患者的评分分别为 6.4、5.9 和 5.4,p < 0.0001)。控制良好的哮喘患者和无哮喘患者的 SF-36 评分之间存在差异,但差异较小且无统计学意义(PCS 评分差异为-1,p = 0.09),对于 MCS 评分差异具有边缘统计学意义(-1.6,p = 0.05),对于 8 个领域的评分差异较小(<5.1),但对于 4 个领域的评分差异具有统计学意义。

结论

这些结果支持了所提出的哮喘控制分级系统的区分性能及其在流行病学中的应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验