Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;41(3):791-802. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys007. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
A mental health advantage has been observed among adolescents in urban areas. This prospective study tests whether cultural integration measured by cross-cultural friendships explains a mental health advantage for adolescents.
A prospective cohort of adolescents was recruited from 51 secondary schools in 10 London boroughs. Cultural identity was assessed by friendship choices within and across ethnic groups. Cultural integration is one of four categories of cultural identity. Using gender-specific linear-mixed models we tested whether cultural integration explained a mental health advantage, and whether gender and age were influential. Demographic and other relevant factors, such as ethnic group, socio-economic status, family structure, parenting styles and perceived racism were also measured and entered into the models. Mental health was measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a 'total difficulties score' and by classification as a 'probable clinical case'.
A total of 6643 pupils in first and second years of secondary school (ages 11-13 years) took part in the baseline survey (2003/04) and 4785 took part in the follow-up survey in 2005-06. Overall mental health improved with age, more so in male rather than female students. Cultural integration (friendships with own and other ethnic groups) was associated with the lowest levels of mental health problems especially among male students. This effect was sustained irrespective of age, ethnicity and other potential explanatory variables. There was a mental health advantage among specific ethnic groups: Black Caribbean and Black African male students (Nigerian/Ghanaian origin) and female Indian students. This was not fully explained by cultural integration, although cultural integration was independently associated with better mental health.
Cultural integration was associated with better mental health, independent of the mental health advantage found among specific ethnic groups: Black Caribbean and some Black African male students and female Indian students.
在城市地区的青少年中观察到了心理健康优势。本前瞻性研究测试了通过跨文化友谊衡量的文化融合是否可以解释青少年的心理健康优势。
从伦敦 10 个行政区的 51 所中学招募了一个青少年前瞻性队列。通过跨族裔的友谊选择来评估文化认同。文化融合是文化认同的四个类别之一。我们使用性别特异性线性混合模型来测试文化融合是否可以解释心理健康优势,以及性别和年龄是否有影响。还测量了人口统计学和其他相关因素,例如族裔群体、社会经济地位、家庭结构、养育方式和感知种族主义,并将其纳入模型。使用《长处与困难问卷》(Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire)衡量心理健康,作为“总体困难评分”,并将其归类为“可能的临床病例”。
共有 6643 名初中一年级和二年级学生(年龄为 11-13 岁)参加了基线调查(2003/04 年),其中 4785 名学生参加了 2005-06 年的随访调查。总体而言,心理健康状况随年龄增长而改善,男生比女生更为明显。文化融合(与自己和其他族裔的友谊)与心理健康问题的最低水平相关,尤其是在男生中。这种影响与年龄、族裔和其他潜在的解释变量无关。在特定族裔群体中存在心理健康优势:加勒比黑人和一些非洲裔黑人男学生(尼日利亚/加纳裔)和印度女学生。尽管文化融合与更好的心理健康状况独立相关,但这并不能完全解释特定族裔群体(加勒比黑人和一些非洲裔黑人男学生和印度女学生)发现的心理健康优势。
文化融合与更好的心理健康状况相关,与特定族裔群体(加勒比黑人和一些非洲裔黑人男学生和印度女学生)发现的心理健康优势无关。