Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Room# 3224, La Jolla, CA 92093-0736, USA.
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 May;26(5):475-87. doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9554-1. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
The computational prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities is of central interest in early-stage drug-discovery, and there is a widely recognized need for improved methods. Low molecular weight receptors and their ligands--i.e., host-guest systems--represent valuable test-beds for such affinity prediction methods, because their small size makes for fast calculations and relatively facile numerical convergence. The SAMPL3 community exercise included the first ever blind prediction challenge for host-guest binding affinities, through the incorporation of 11 new host-guest complexes. Ten participating research groups addressed this challenge with a variety of approaches. Statistical assessment indicates that, although most methods performed well at predicting some general trends in binding affinity, overall accuracy was not high, as all the methods suffered from either poor correlation or high RMS errors or both. There was no clear advantage in using explicit versus implicit solvent models, any particular force field, or any particular approach to conformational sampling. In a few cases, predictions using very similar energy models but different sampling and/or free-energy methods resulted in significantly different results. The protonation states of one host and some guest molecules emerged as key uncertainties beyond the choice of computational approach. The present results have implications for methods development and future blind prediction exercises.
蛋白质-配体结合亲和力的计算预测是药物发现早期的核心关注点,人们普遍认识到需要改进方法。低分子量受体及其配体(即主客体体系)是此类亲和力预测方法的宝贵测试平台,因为它们的小尺寸使得计算速度更快,数值收敛相对容易。SAMPL3 社区活动首次通过纳入 11 个新的主客体复合物,为主体-客体结合亲和力提供了盲测预测挑战。十个参与的研究小组通过各种方法来应对这一挑战。统计评估表明,尽管大多数方法在预测结合亲和力的某些一般趋势方面表现良好,但整体准确性不高,因为所有方法都存在相关性差、均方根误差高或两者兼而有之的问题。使用显式溶剂模型与隐式溶剂模型、任何特定的力场或任何特定的构象采样方法都没有明显的优势。在少数情况下,使用非常相似的能量模型但采样和/或自由能方法不同的情况下,预测结果会有显著差异。一个主体和一些客体分子的质子化状态是除计算方法选择之外的关键不确定性因素。目前的结果对方法开发和未来的盲测预测活动具有启示意义。