Todros T, Capuzzo E, Gaglioti P
Unit of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turin University, Turin, Italy.
Images Paediatr Cardiol. 2001 Apr;3(2):3-18.
Up till the early 1970s, prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies was primarily aimed at detecting chromosomal abnormalities by amniocentesis.1. Over the last two decades, prenatal diagnosis has greatly benefited from advances in ultrasound technology and in our ability to detect microscopic and submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities as well as single gene disorders, leading to substantive improvements in detection of such congenital anomalies.2 At present, invasive prenatal diagnosis continues to be the gold standard for pregnancies at increased risk for chromosomal anomaly or other genetic disease, with chorionic villus sampling being the procedure of choice for the first trimester,3 whereas mid-trimester amniocentesis continues to be the most common form of invasive procedure for prenatal diagnosis.4 Still, invasive techniques are restricted to subgroups at risk for anomalies, for whom such time-consuming procedures are believed to be cost-effective, also accounting for procedure-related abortive risks. In the low-risk population prenatal diagnosis generally consists of screening procedures by means of ultrasound and maternal serum biochemistry.
直到20世纪70年代初,先天性异常的产前诊断主要旨在通过羊膜穿刺术检测染色体异常。1. 在过去二十年中,产前诊断极大地受益于超声技术的进步以及我们检测微观和亚微观染色体异常以及单基因疾病的能力,从而在这类先天性异常的检测方面取得了实质性进展。2. 目前,侵入性产前诊断仍然是染色体异常或其他遗传疾病风险增加的妊娠的金标准,绒毛取样是孕早期的首选方法,3. 而孕中期羊膜穿刺术仍然是产前诊断最常见的侵入性检查形式。4. 然而,侵入性技术仅限于有异常风险的亚组人群,对于他们来说,这种耗时的检查被认为具有成本效益,同时也要考虑与检查相关的流产风险。在低风险人群中,产前诊断通常包括通过超声和母体血清生化进行筛查。