Susan Samueli Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine CA 92697-4075, USA.
Chin Med. 2012 Feb 28;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1749-8546-7-4.
The existence of point specificity in acupuncture is controversial, because many acupuncture studies using this principle to select control points have found that sham acupoints have similar effects to those of verum acupoints. Furthermore, the results of pain-related studies based on visual analogue scales have not supported the concept of point specificity. In contrast, hemodynamic, functional magnetic resonance imaging and neurophysiological studies evaluating the responses to stimulation of multiple points on the body surface have shown that point-specific actions are present. This review article focuses on clinical and laboratory studies supporting the existence of point specificity in acupuncture and also addresses studies that do not support this concept. Further research is needed to elucidate the point-specific actions of acupuncture.
针刺穴位的特异性一直存在争议,因为许多采用该原理选择对照穴位的针刺研究发现,假穴与真穴具有相似的效果。此外,基于视觉模拟量表的疼痛相关研究结果也不支持穴位特异性的概念。相比之下,评估人体表面多个穴位刺激反应的血流动力学、功能磁共振成像和神经生理学研究表明,穴位具有特异性。本文综述了支持针刺穴位特异性的临床和实验室研究,并讨论了不支持这一概念的研究。需要进一步的研究来阐明针刺的穴位特异性作用。