Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Acad Med. 2012 Mar;87(3):292-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318244759e.
Medical and health sciences educators are increasingly employing team-based learning (TBL) in their teaching activities. TBL is a comprehensive strategy for developing and using self-managed learning teams that has created a fertile area for medical education scholarship. However, because this method can be implemented in a variety of ways, published reports about TBL may be difficult to understand, critique, replicate, or compare unless authors fully describe their interventions.The authors of this article offer a conceptual model and propose a set of guidelines for standardizing the way that the results of TBL implementations are reported and critiqued. They identify and articulate the seven core design elements that underlie the TBL method and relate them to educational principles that maximize student engagement and learning within teams. The guidelines underscore important principles relevant to many forms of small-group learning. The authors suggest that following these guidelines when writing articles about TBL implementations should help standardize descriptive information in the medical and health sciences education literature about the essential aspects of TBL activities and allow authors and reviewers to successfully replicate TBL implementations and draw meaningful conclusions about observed outcomes.
医学和卫生科学教育工作者越来越多地在教学活动中采用团队学习(TBL)。TBL 是一种发展和使用自我管理学习团队的综合策略,为医学教育研究创造了一个肥沃的领域。然而,由于这种方法可以以多种方式实施,因此除非作者充分描述他们的干预措施,否则关于 TBL 的已发表报告可能难以理解、批评、复制或比较。本文的作者提供了一个概念模型,并提出了一套用于规范 TBL 实施结果报告和批评的准则。他们确定并阐明了构成 TBL 方法基础的七个核心设计要素,并将其与最大限度地提高团队中学生参与度和学习效果的教育原则联系起来。这些准则强调了与许多形式的小组学习相关的重要原则。作者建议,在撰写有关 TBL 实施的文章时遵循这些准则,应该有助于标准化医学和卫生科学教育文献中关于 TBL 活动基本方面的描述性信息,并使作者和评论者能够成功复制 TBL 实施并对观察到的结果得出有意义的结论。