Friese Christopher R
Division of Nursing Business and Health Systems, School of Nursing, University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, USA.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Mar;39(2):166-72. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.166-172.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine the reliability and validity of modified items from the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) for use in the understudied ambulatory oncology setting.
Cross-sectional mailed survey using a modified Dillman method.
Southeastern United States.
Population-based statewide sample of 1,339 oncology nurses who reported employment outside of hospital inpatient units.
After examining for nonresponse bias, confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling and Cronbach coefficient alphas were employed to examine construct validity and internal consistency, respectively. After calculating revised subscale means for each nurse, the researchers used t tests to compare subscale means between nurses who reported their practice environment as favorable versus those who reported it as mixed or unfavorable.
Reliability and validity of items on the adapted version of the PES-NWI.
Despite a response rate of 31%, no differences in demographic characteristics were observed between the analytic sample and nonresponders. After reducing the number of items to 23, acceptable model fit was achieved with a comparative fit index of 0.95 and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.057. All five existing PES-NWI subscales, plus the new medical assistant support subscale, were significantly higher for nurses who reported favorable practice environments versus those who reported mixed or unfavorable environments.
A revised set of items derived from the PES-NWI has acceptable reliability and validity to measure the quality of nursing practice environments in ambulatory oncology settings. Medical assistant support is a new contribution to the item pool.
Additional testing of this revised measure in diverse samples of nurses, including studies that correlate with patient outcomes, is a necessary next step.
目的/目标:检验《护理工作指数实践环境量表》(PES-NWI)中经过修改的条目在研究较少的门诊肿瘤护理环境中的信度和效度。
采用改良的迪尔曼方法进行横断面邮寄调查。
美国东南部。
基于人群的全州范围内1339名肿瘤护士的样本,这些护士报告受雇于医院住院部以外的单位。
在检查无应答偏倚后,分别采用结构方程模型进行验证性因子分析和计算克朗巴赫系数α来检验结构效度和内部一致性。在计算出每位护士修订后的分量表均值后,研究人员使用t检验比较报告其执业环境为有利的护士与报告其执业环境为混合或不利的护士之间的分量表均值。
PES-NWI改编版条目的信度和效度。
尽管应答率为31%,但分析样本与未应答者在人口统计学特征上未观察到差异。在将条目数量减少到23条后,获得了可接受的模型拟合度,比较拟合指数为0.95,近似均方根误差为0.057。报告有利执业环境的护士在所有五个现有的PES-NWI分量表以及新的医疗助理支持分量表上的得分均显著高于报告混合或不利环境的护士。
从PES-NWI衍生出的一组修订条目具有可接受的信度和效度,可用于测量门诊肿瘤护理环境中的护理实践质量。医疗助理支持是条目库中的一项新内容。
下一步有必要在不同护士样本中对这一修订后的测量方法进行进一步测试,包括与患者结局相关的研究。