• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义加工中身体 - 物体交互效应的神经关联。

The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing.

作者信息

Hargreaves Ian S, Leonard Gemma A, Pexman Penny M, Pittman Daniel J, Siakaluk Paul D, Goodyear Bradley G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 16;6:22. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00022. eCollection 2012 Jan 24.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00022
PMID:22375111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3280593/
Abstract

The semantic richness dimension referred to as body-object interaction (BOI) measures perceptions of the ease with which people can physically interact with words' referents. Previous studies have shown facilitated lexical and semantic processing for words rated high in BOI, e.g., belt, than for words rated low in BOI, e.g., sun. These BOI effects have been taken as evidence that embodied information is relevant to word recognition (Siakaluk et al., 2008a). However, to date there is no evidence linking BOI manipulations to differences in the utilization of perceptual or sensorimotor areas of the brain. The current study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural correlates of BOI in a semantic categorization task (SCT). Sixteen healthy adults participated. Results showed that high BOI words were associated with activation in the left inferior parietal lobule (supramarginal gyrus, BA 40), a sensory association area involved in kinesthetic memory. These results provide evidence that the BOI dimension captures the relative availability of sensorimotor information, and that this contributes to semantic processing.

摘要

被称为身体-物体互动(BOI)的语义丰富度维度衡量的是人们与单词所指对象进行身体互动的难易程度的感知。先前的研究表明,对于在BOI方面评分高的单词,如“belt”(腰带),其词汇和语义处理比在BOI方面评分低的单词,如“sun”(太阳)更容易。这些BOI效应被视为具身信息与单词识别相关的证据(西亚卡卢克等人,2008年a)。然而,迄今为止,尚无证据将BOI操作与大脑感知或感觉运动区域利用的差异联系起来。当前的研究使用事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来检查语义分类任务(SCT)中BOI的神经关联。16名健康成年人参与了研究。结果表明,高BOI单词与左侧下顶叶小叶(缘上回,BA 40)的激活有关,该区域是一个参与动觉记忆的感觉关联区域。这些结果提供了证据,表明BOI维度捕捉了感觉运动信息的相对可用性,并且这有助于语义处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28b0/3280593/1869d32e64d0/fnhum-06-00022-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28b0/3280593/1869d32e64d0/fnhum-06-00022-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28b0/3280593/1869d32e64d0/fnhum-06-00022-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing.语义加工中身体 - 物体交互效应的神经关联。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 16;6:22. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00022. eCollection 2012 Jan 24.
2
Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.把握词汇语义加工中的感觉运动效应。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):1-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1.
3
The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing.感觉运动知识的好处:身体-物体互动促进语义处理。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr 5;32(3):591-605. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035399.
4
Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing.语义丰富性的灵活征募:语境在词汇语义加工中调节身体与物体的交互作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 15;6:53. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00053. eCollection 2012.
5
Development of Embodied Word Meanings: Sensorimotor Effects in Children's Lexical Processing.具身语义的发展:儿童词汇加工中的感觉运动效应
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00317. eCollection 2016.
6
Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns.情绪和感觉运动知识对具体名词和抽象名词语义加工的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Oct 8;6:275. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275. eCollection 2012.
7
Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.视觉单词识别过程中感觉运动信息激活的证据:身体 - 物体交互效应。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):433-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
8
Can you touch the N400? The interactive effects of body-object interaction and task demands on N400 amplitudes and decision latencies.能否触及 N400?身体-客体互动和任务需求对 N400 振幅和决策时滞的交互影响。
Brain Lang. 2022 Aug;231:105147. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105147. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
9
Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.量化感觉运动体验:9000 多个英语单词的身体-物体相互作用评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z.
10
Context matters: How do task demands modulate the recruitment of sensorimotor information during language processing?情境很重要:在语言处理过程中,任务需求如何调节感觉运动信息的招募?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jan 17;16:976954. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.976954. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Body-object interaction ratings for 3600 French nouns.3600 个法语音译名词的体感交互评价。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):8009-8021. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02466-5. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
On choosing the vehicles of metaphors 2.0: the interactive effects of semantic neighborhood density and body-object interaction on metaphor production.论隐喻2.0的载体选择:语义邻域密度与身体 - 对象互动对隐喻生成的交互作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1216561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216561. eCollection 2023.
3
Item-Level Scores on the Boston Naming Test as an Independent Predictor of Perirhinal Volume in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

本文引用的文献

1
The question shapes the answer: the neural correlates of task differences reveal dynamic semantic processing.问题塑造答案:任务差异的神经关联揭示了动态语义处理。
Brain Lang. 2012 Jan;120(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
2
Tangible words are recognized faster: the grounding of meaning in sensory and perceptual systems.具体的词汇能被更快地识别:意义在感觉和知觉系统中的扎根。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Sep;64(9):1683-91. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605150.
3
The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.
波士顿命名测试中的项目级分数作为轻度认知障碍个体鼻周容积的独立预测指标。
Brain Sci. 2023 May 16;13(5):806. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050806.
4
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".关于使用图片-单词干扰范式研究的警示:随意使用“有生命/无生命”概念带来的不良后果
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1145884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884. eCollection 2023.
5
Context matters: How do task demands modulate the recruitment of sensorimotor information during language processing?情境很重要:在语言处理过程中,任务需求如何调节感觉运动信息的招募?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jan 17;16:976954. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.976954. eCollection 2022.
6
Ultimate Grounding of Abstract Concepts: A Graded Account.抽象概念的最终基础:一种分级解释。
J Cogn. 2022 Mar 11;5(1):21. doi: 10.5334/joc.214. eCollection 2022.
7
Serial Recall Order of Category Fluency Words: Exploring Its Neural Underpinnings.类别流畅性词汇的序列回忆顺序:探索其神经基础。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 6;12:777838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.777838. eCollection 2021.
8
A novel coding scheme for assessing responses in divergent thinking: An embodied approach.一种用于评估发散性思维反应的新型编码方案:一种具身方法。
Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2021 Aug;15(3):412-425. doi: 10.1037/aca0000297. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Serial Recall Order and Semantic Features of Category Fluency Words to Study Semantic Memory in Normal Ageing.通过类别流畅性词语的系列回忆顺序和语义特征研究正常衰老过程中的语义记忆
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Aug 3;13:678588. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.678588. eCollection 2021.
10
Fine Motor Skills and Lexical Processing in Children and Adults.儿童和成人的精细运动技能与词汇处理
Front Psychol. 2021 May 12;12:666200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666200. eCollection 2021.
英国词汇项目:28730 个单音节和双音节英语单词的词汇判断数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):287-304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4.
4
Imageability and body-object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns.599 个多音节名词的可想象性和身体-物体互动评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Dec;43(4):1100-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0117-5.
5
The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing.感觉运动知识的好处:身体-物体互动促进语义处理。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr 5;32(3):591-605. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035399.
6
Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions.心智和大脑中的概念表示:理论发展、当前证据和未来方向。
Cortex. 2012 Jul;48(7):805-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
7
Tracking real-time neural activation of conceptual knowledge using single-trial event-related potentials.使用单试次事件相关电位追踪概念知识的实时神经激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):970-983. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
8
Mental representations of action: the neural correlates of the verbal and motor components.动作的心理表象:言语和运动成分的神经关联。
Brain Res. 2010 Apr 30;1328:89-103. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.082. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
9
Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: what is shared, what is different?正字法和联想近邻密度效应:有何共同,有何不同?
Psychophysiology. 2010 May 1;47(3):455-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00960.x. Epub 2010 Jan 19.
10
Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.超越库切拉和弗朗西斯:当前词频规范的批判性评估,以及美国英语新的、经过改进的词频衡量标准的引入。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.