• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

把握词汇语义加工中的感觉运动效应。

Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):1-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1
PMID:29967978
Abstract

One of the strategies that researchers have used to investigate the role of sensorimotor information in lexical-semantic processing is to examine the effects of words' rated body-object interaction (BOI; i.e., the ease with which the human body can interact with a word's referent). Processing tends to be facilitated for words with high as compared with low BOI, across a wide variety of tasks. Such effects have been referenced in debates over the nature of semantic representations, but their theoretical import has been limited by the fact that BOI is a fairly coarse measure of sensorimotor experience with words' referents. In the present study, we collected ratings for 621 words on seven semantic dimensions (graspability, ease of pantomime, number of actions, animacy, size, danger, and usefulness), in order to investigate which attributes are most strongly related to BOI ratings and to lexical-semantic processing. BOI ratings were obtained from previous norming studies (Bennett, Burnett, Siakaluk, & Pexman in Behavior Research Methods, 43, 1100-1109, 2011; Tillotson, Siakaluk, & Pexman in Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1075-1078, 2008), and measures of lexical-semantic processing were obtained from previous behavioral megastudies involving either the semantic categorization task (concrete/abstract decision; Pexman, Heard, Lloyd, & Yap in Behavior Research Methods, 49, 407-417, 2017) or the lexical decision task (Balota et al., Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459, 2007). The results showed that the motor dimensions of graspability, ease of pantomime, and number of actions were all related to BOI, and that these dimensions together explained more variance in semantic processing than did the BOI ratings alone. These ratings will be useful for researchers who wish to study how different kinds of bodily interactions influence lexical-semantic processing and cognition.

摘要

研究人员在研究感觉运动信息在词汇语义处理中的作用时,使用的策略之一是研究词汇的身体-物体相互作用(BOI;即人体与词汇所指对象相互作用的容易程度)评分的影响。在各种任务中,高 BOI 词汇的处理往往比低 BOI 词汇更容易。这些影响在关于语义表示性质的争论中被引用,但由于 BOI 是对词汇所指对象的感觉运动经验的相当粗糙的衡量标准,因此其理论意义有限。在本研究中,我们收集了 621 个单词在七个语义维度(可抓握性、手势模拟容易度、动作数量、生动性、大小、危险度和有用度)上的评分,以研究哪些属性与 BOI 评分和词汇语义处理关系最密切。BOI 评分来自之前的标准化研究(Bennett、Burnett、Siakaluk 和 Pexman 在《行为研究方法》,43,1100-1109,2011;Tillotson、Siakaluk 和 Pexman 在《行为研究方法》,40,1075-1078,2008),而词汇语义处理的测量则来自之前的行为巨量研究,涉及语义分类任务(具体/抽象决策;Pexman、Heard、Lloyd 和 yap 在《行为研究方法》,49,407-417,2017)或词汇决策任务(Balota 等人,《行为研究方法》,39,445-459,2007)。结果表明,可抓握性、手势模拟容易度和动作数量这三个运动维度都与 BOI 相关,并且这些维度一起比单独的 BOI 评分更能解释语义处理的变化。这些评分将对希望研究不同类型的身体互动如何影响词汇语义处理和认知的研究人员有用。

相似文献

1
Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.把握词汇语义加工中的感觉运动效应。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):1-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1.
2
Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.量化感觉运动体验:9000 多个英语单词的身体-物体相互作用评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z.
3
Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.视觉单词识别过程中感觉运动信息激活的证据:身体 - 物体交互效应。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):433-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
4
The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing.语义加工中身体 - 物体交互效应的神经关联。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 16;6:22. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00022. eCollection 2012 Jan 24.
5
The benefits of sensorimotor knowledge: body-object interaction facilitates semantic processing.感觉运动知识的好处:身体-物体互动促进语义处理。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Apr 5;32(3):591-605. doi: 10.1080/03640210802035399.
6
Development of Embodied Word Meanings: Sensorimotor Effects in Children's Lexical Processing.具身语义的发展:儿童词汇加工中的感觉运动效应
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00317. eCollection 2016.
7
Quantifying children's sensorimotor experience: Child body-object interaction ratings for 3359 English words.量化儿童的感觉运动体验:3359 个英语单词的儿童身体-物体互动评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):2864-2877. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01798-4. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
8
Flexible recruitment of semantic richness: context modulates body-object interaction effects in lexical-semantic processing.语义丰富性的灵活征募:语境在词汇语义加工中调节身体与物体的交互作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 15;6:53. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00053. eCollection 2012.
9
Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns.情绪和感觉运动知识对具体名词和抽象名词语义加工的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Oct 8;6:275. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275. eCollection 2012.
10
Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks.情境概念化与语义加工:语义分类和命名任务中情绪体验与情境可得性的影响
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):408-19. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0696-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Reward as a facet of word meaning: Ratings of motivation for 8,601 English words.作为词义一个方面的奖赏:对8601个英语单词的动机评级
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 29;57(9):242. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02762-8.
2
Contrasting the organization of concrete and abstract word meanings.对比具体词汇和抽象词汇意义的组织方式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02671-z.
3
Grasping Variance in Word Norms: Individual Differences in Motor Imagery and Semantic Ratings.把握词规范中的差异:运动想象和语义评级中的个体差异。
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 7;8(1):12. doi: 10.5334/joc.418. eCollection 2025.
4
Affordance norms for 2825 concrete nouns.2825 个具体名词的可供性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8480-8491. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02486-1. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
5
Body-object interaction ratings for 3600 French nouns.3600 个法语音译名词的体感交互评价。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):8009-8021. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02466-5. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
6
On choosing the vehicles of metaphors 2.0: the interactive effects of semantic neighborhood density and body-object interaction on metaphor production.论隐喻2.0的载体选择:语义邻域密度与身体 - 对象互动对隐喻生成的交互作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 5;14:1216561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216561. eCollection 2023.
7
Is "earth" an animate thing? Cross-language and inter-age analyses of animacy word ratings in European Portuguese and British English young and older adults.“地球”是有生命的东西吗?欧洲葡萄牙语和英国英语中青年和老年被试对有生命词评价的跨语言和跨年龄分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 4;18(8):e0289755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289755. eCollection 2023.
8
Non-arbitrary mappings between size and sound of English words: Form typicality effects during lexical access and memory.英语单词大小与发音之间的非任意映射:词汇通达和记忆过程中的形式典型性效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):943-963. doi: 10.1177/17470218231184940. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
9
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".关于使用图片-单词干扰范式研究的警示:随意使用“有生命/无生命”概念带来的不良后果
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1145884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884. eCollection 2023.
10
A large dataset of semantic ratings and its computational extension.一个大型语义评级数据集及其计算扩展。
Sci Data. 2023 Feb 23;10(1):106. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-01995-6.