• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击波的生物学效应:仔猪肝脏中冲击波引起的空化作用

Biological effects of shock waves: cavitation by shock waves in piglet liver.

作者信息

Delius M, Denk R, Berding C, Liebich H G, Jordan M, Brendel W

机构信息

Institute for Surgical Research, University of Munich, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(5):467-72. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(90)90169-d.

DOI:10.1016/0301-5629(90)90169-d
PMID:2238253
Abstract

Shock waves are known to generate cavitation in vitro. In vivo, extracorporeal shock waves may cause haemorrhages in tissues. Two types of changes were detected by conventional, real-time B-scan ultrasound when shock waves were administered to 5 piglet livers in vivo: transient changes consisting of bright signals in intrahepatic branches of the portal vein and tributaries of the hepatic vein, presumed to originate from gas bubbles, and stationary changes consisting of brightening of the area along the long axis of the high pressure field, presumed to indicate an increased number of gas-filled bubbles in this area. Transient changes appeared from the start of shock wave administration; bright signals were seen in liver vessels for several hundred microseconds before they were flushed away with the blood flow. Stationary changes appeared later, increased in intensity over several hundred shock waves and persisted for minutes after cessation of shock wave administration. Both types of signals were interpreted as direct evidence that lithotripter shock waves generated cavitation in vivo. Similar signals were received in the partly degassed water of the lithotripter tub. At autopsy of the piglets, focal intralobular haemorrhages and thrombi of portal veins were detected in the shock wave path. The occurrence of cavitation and tissue damage in the same gross area suggests that cavitation might be involved in the generation of tissue damage by shock waves.

摘要

已知冲击波在体外可产生空化现象。在体内,体外冲击波可导致组织出血。当对5只仔猪肝脏进行体内冲击波治疗时,通过传统实时B超扫描检测到两种变化:一种是短暂变化,表现为门静脉肝内分支和肝静脉属支内出现明亮信号,推测源于气泡;另一种是静态变化,表现为高压场长轴沿线区域变亮,推测表明该区域内充满气体的气泡数量增加。短暂变化在冲击波治疗开始时就出现;肝脏血管内可见明亮信号持续数百微秒,随后被血流冲走。静态变化稍后出现,在数百次冲击波作用下强度增加,在冲击波治疗停止后仍持续数分钟。这两种信号都被解释为体外冲击波碎石机在体内产生空化现象的直接证据。在碎石机水槽部分脱气的水中也接收到了类似信号。对仔猪进行尸检时,在冲击波路径上发现了小叶内局灶性出血和门静脉血栓。在同一大体区域出现空化现象和组织损伤表明,空化可能与冲击波导致的组织损伤有关。

相似文献

1
Biological effects of shock waves: cavitation by shock waves in piglet liver.冲击波的生物学效应:仔猪肝脏中冲击波引起的空化作用
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(5):467-72. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(90)90169-d.
2
Biological effects of shock waves: effect of shock waves on the liver and gallbladder wall of dogs--administration rate dependence.冲击波的生物学效应:冲击波对犬肝脏和胆囊壁的影响——给药速率依赖性
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(5):459-66. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(90)90168-c.
3
Sonographic imaging of extracorporeal shock wave effects in the liver and gallbladder of dogs.犬肝脏和胆囊体外冲击波效应的超声成像
Digestion. 1992;52(1):55-60. doi: 10.1159/000200939.
4
Hepatic lesions in the rabbit induced by acoustic cavitation.声空化诱导兔肝脏损伤
Gastroenterology. 1991 May;100(5 Pt 1):1345-50.
5
Biological effects of shock waves: kidney haemorrhage by shock waves in dogs--administration rate dependence.冲击波的生物学效应:狗体内冲击波导致的肾出血——给药速率依赖性
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14(8):689-94. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(88)90025-7.
6
Biological effects of shock waves: in vivo effect of high energy pulses on rabbit bone.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21(9):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(95)00030-5.
7
Time-resolved observations of shock waves and cavitation bubbles generated by femtosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water.飞秒激光脉冲在角膜组织和水中产生的冲击波和空化气泡的时间分辨观测。
Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19(1):23-31. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:1<23::AID-LSM4>3.0.CO;2-S.
8
Biological effects of shock waves: kidney damage by shock waves in dogs--dose dependence.冲击波的生物学效应:狗体内冲击波导致的肾损伤——剂量依赖性
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14(2):117-22. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(88)90178-0.
9
Simulation of gallstone fragments by cavitation bubbles during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: physical basis and in vitro demonstration.
Radiology. 1990 Mar;174(3 Pt 1):787-91. doi: 10.1148/radiology.174.3.2406784.
10
Detachment and sonoporation of adherent HeLa-cells by shock wave-induced cavitation.冲击波诱导的空化作用对贴壁HeLa细胞的分离与声孔效应
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Dec 5;1624(1-3):131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2003.10.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatic and Renal Histotripsy in an Anticoagulated Porcine Model.肝和肾组织声击穿在抗凝猪模型中的应用。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Mar;34(3):386-394.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.11.034. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
2
Histotripsy: the first noninvasive, non-ionizing, non-thermal ablation technique based on ultrasound.组织微爆破:基于超声的首个非侵入式、非电离、非热消融技术。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):561-575. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1905189.
3
Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.
改进当代电磁式冲击波碎石机的透镜设计和性能。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):E1167-75. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319203111. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
4
Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.第8节——临床相关性。美国医学超声学会。
J Ultrasound Med. 2000 Feb;19(2):149-68. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.2.149.
5
Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.第7节——机械指数及其他暴露参数的讨论。美国医学超声学会。
J Ultrasound Med. 2000 Feb;19(2):143-8, 154-68. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.2.143.
6
Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.第6节——气体载体超声造影剂存在下的机械生物效应。美国超声医学学会。
J Ultrasound Med. 2000 Feb;19(2):120-42, 154-68. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.2.120.
7
Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.第4节——含气体组织中的生物效应。美国医学超声学会。
J Ultrasound Med. 2000 Feb;19(2):97-108, 154-68. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.2.97.