Centre for Child and Family Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Attach Hum Dev. 2012;14(2):101-17. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2012.661217.
In a longitudinal study with 73 mothers and their second-born child, stability and main-level differences between measures of maternal sensitivity across settings and over time were examined. Furthermore, the predictability of harsh discipline by these different maternal sensitivity measures was studied. Maternal sensitivity was assessed at three and six months during bathing, free play on mother's lap and the baseline and reunion episode of the Still Face Paradigm (SFP; Tronick, Als, Adamson, Wise, & Brazelton, 1978 ). Harsh discipline was observed during three home visits in the second year of life. Results showed a single underlying factor for all maternal sensitivity settings at both time points and significant stability over time. Harsh discipline was predicted by maternal sensitivity at three months, which was fully mediated by maternal sensitivity at six months. Early failure to respond appropriately to infant signals is an important indicator of risk for future harsh parenting.
在一项针对 73 位母亲及其二胎的纵向研究中,研究人员考察了母亲敏感性在不同情境和不同时间的稳定性和主要水平差异。此外,还研究了这些不同的母亲敏感性测量方法对严厉纪律的预测能力。在洗澡、母亲腿上的自由玩耍以及静止脸范式(Still Face Paradigm,SFP;Tronick、Als、Adamson、Wise 和 Brazelton,1978)的基线和重聚阶段,分别在 3 个月和 6 个月时评估了母亲敏感性。在第二年的 3 次家访中观察了严厉的纪律。结果表明,在两个时间点的所有母亲敏感性设置中都存在一个单一的潜在因素,并且具有随时间的显著稳定性。3 个月时的母亲敏感性预测了严厉纪律,6 个月时的母亲敏感性完全中介了这一预测。早期对婴儿信号的反应不当是未来严厉育儿的一个重要风险指标。