• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者腹腔镜和机器人根治性膀胱切除术的结果。

Outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic radical cystectomy in the elderly patients.

机构信息

Service d'Urologie, Transplantation Rénale et Andrologie, CHU, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.042.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.042
PMID:22386404
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy (LRRC) for urothelial cancer of bladder (UCB) between elderly (≥ 70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 146 patients who underwent LRRC between 2003 and 2010 at 2 academic institutions (Cleveland, Ohio, United States and Toulouse, France) was performed. Of these, 74 patients were classified as elderly (≥ 70 years) and 72 patients were considered younger (<70 years). Perioperative outcomes, final pathology results, overall survival (OS), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar clinical stage at diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, and gender distribution. Ileal conduit-type diversion was favored in the older vs younger group, 84% vs 36%, respectively. Overall conversion rate to open procedures was 4% in both groups. Perioperative complication rate was not significantly different between the younger and older patients. Positive margin rate was 5% in both groups. The 5-year OS for older and younger patients was 75% and 87%, respectively (P = .03), and the 5-year CSS for the 2 groups was 51% and 54%, respectively (P = .7).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic/robotic radical cystectomy in the elderly does not have worse perioperative complications or pathologic outcomes compared with younger patients and therefore can be offered as treatment option in select older patients.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜/机器人根治性膀胱切除术(LRRC)治疗膀胱尿路上皮癌(UCB)在老年(≥70 岁)和年轻(<70 岁)患者中的围手术期结果。

材料和方法

回顾性分析了 2003 年至 2010 年在 2 个学术机构(美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰和法国图卢兹)接受 LRRC 的 146 例患者。其中,74 例患者被归类为老年(≥70 岁),72 例患者被认为是年轻(<70 岁)。比较两组患者的围手术期结果、最终病理结果、总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。

结果

两组患者在诊断时的临床分期、美国麻醉医师协会评分、体重指数和性别分布均相似。老年组与年轻组相比,分别有 84%和 36%的患者采用回肠造口术。两组总体中转开放手术的比例均为 4%。年轻患者和老年患者的围手术期并发症发生率无显著差异。两组患者的切缘阳性率均为 5%。老年和年轻患者的 5 年 OS 分别为 75%和 87%(P=0.03),两组的 5 年 CSS 分别为 51%和 54%(P=0.7)。

结论

与年轻患者相比,老年患者接受腹腔镜/机器人根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期并发症或病理结果并不差,因此可以作为选择老年患者的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic radical cystectomy in the elderly patients.老年患者腹腔镜和机器人根治性膀胱切除术的结果。
Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.042.
2
Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.机器人辅助与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的前瞻性随机对照研究:围手术期和病理结果。
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
3
Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases.机器人根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:100 例连续病例的手术和病理结果。
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):510-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.027. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
4
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱前列腺切除术
Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):310-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.067. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
5
Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy.一项开放手术与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的前瞻性随机临床试验的围手术期结果和肿瘤学疗效。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.077. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
6
Does patient age affect survival after radical cystectomy?患者年龄会影响根治性膀胱切除术的生存吗?
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E486-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11180.x. Epub 2012 May 2.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystoprostatectomy for localized bladder cancer with 3-year oncological followup: a single surgeon experience.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱前列腺切除术治疗局限性膀胱癌的3年肿瘤学随访比较:单中心经验
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2340-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.020. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
8
Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes.机器人和腹腔镜高位扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术在根治性膀胱切除术中的应用:技术与结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Feb;61(2):350-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: operative and pathological outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱前列腺切除术:手术及病理结果
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):814-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.040. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
10
Multi-institutional analysis of robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative outcomes and complications in 227 patients.膀胱癌机器人根治性膀胱切除术的多机构分析:227例患者的围手术期结果及并发症
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):17-21. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0326. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study of Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes Between Elderly Patients and Younger Patients Who Received Radical Cystectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.接受根治性膀胱切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术的老年患者与年轻患者围手术期及肿瘤学结局的比较研究:一项单中心回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Feb 15;14:603-613. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S350587. eCollection 2022.
2
Contemporary techniques and outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道的当代技术与结果
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2216-2232. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.45.
3
Peri-operative efficacy and long-term survival benefit of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy in septuagenarian patients compared with younger patients: a nationwide multi-institutional study in Japan.
与年轻患者相比,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术在 70 岁以上患者中的围手术期疗效和长期生存获益:日本全国多机构研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;24(12):1588-1595. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01470-6. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy in octogenarians: analysis of a Japanese multicenter cohort.80 岁以上患者的腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:日本多中心队列分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):1081-1088. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01446-6. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Radical cystectomy in the elderly - Is this a safe treatment option?老年患者的根治性膀胱切除术——这是一种安全的治疗选择吗?
Arab J Urol. 2017 Oct 5;15(4):360-365. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.002. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
A preliminary oncologic outcome and postoperative complications in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Initial experience.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术患者的初步肿瘤学结果和术后并发症:初步经验。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 May;58(3):171-178. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.3.171. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
7
How to optimally manage elderly bladder cancer patients?如何对老年膀胱癌患者进行最佳管理?
Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Oct;5(5):683-691. doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.04.08.
8
Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy in the Elderly - Results of a Single Center LRC only Series.老年患者的腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术——单中心仅腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术系列的结果
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):1099-1108. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0419.
9
The morbidity of laparoscopic radical cystectomy: analysis of postoperative complications in a multicenter cohort by the European Association of Urology (EAU)-Section of Uro-Technology.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的发病率:欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)泌尿技术分会对多中心队列术后并发症的分析
World J Urol. 2016 Feb;34(2):149-56. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1633-1. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
Perioperative and survival outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients over 70 years.70岁以上膀胱癌患者行腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期及生存结局
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(1):24-9. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.01.498. Epub 2015 Mar 13.