Suppr超能文献

捆绑支付:为加拿大的持续护理提供激励机制的契机?

Bundles: an opportunity to align incentives for continuing care in Canada?

机构信息

Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

Abstract

Over the past three decades, diagnosis related groups (DRG) have revolutionized hospital funding by successfully focusing hospitals attention on the 'production' process. However, using DRG for funding acute hospitals does little to create incentives outside of the hospital, or coordinate health care across providers and settings. With many health care quality and efficiency issues stemming from failures at the 'seams' in the system, there is increasing interest in creating new 'bundles' of care which includes acute and post-acute care services that align economic incentives for care coordination. Analysis of Ontario (Canada) datasets demonstrates that linking existing sources of clinical, administrative and cost data to create 'bundles' is technically feasible. However, key implementation challenges need to be addressed, such as administrative and contractual arrangements across multiple provider organizations, pricing and relations with physicians. Nonetheless, this analysis of Ontario data demonstrates that bundles provide an alternative policy option to DRG's in Canada's move toward activity-based funding.

摘要

在过去的三十年中,诊断相关分组(DRG)通过成功地将医院的注意力集中在“生产”过程上,彻底改变了医院的资金来源。然而,将 DRG 用于急性医院的资金筹集,对医院以外的激励措施或协调医疗服务提供者和环境几乎没有作用。由于系统“接口”处的失败而导致许多医疗保健质量和效率问题,人们越来越有兴趣创建新的“一揽子”护理,其中包括协调经济激励措施的急性和康复后护理服务。对安大略省(加拿大)数据集的分析表明,链接现有的临床、管理和成本数据来源以创建“一揽子”护理在技术上是可行的。然而,需要解决关键的实施挑战,例如多个提供者组织之间的行政和合同安排、定价以及与医生的关系。尽管如此,对安大略省数据的分析表明,在加拿大向基于活动的资金转移的过程中,与 DRG 相比,捆绑提供了一种替代的政策选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验