• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同电疗法治疗肌筋膜疼痛的比较。

Comparison of two different techniques of electrotherapy on myofascial pain.

作者信息

Ardiç F, Sarhus M, Topuz O

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2002 Jan 1;16(1):11-6. doi: 10.3233/bmr-2002-16103.

DOI:10.3233/bmr-2002-16103
PMID:22387359
Abstract

This study was designed to compare the effects of Transcutaneus Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) on myofascial trigger point (MTrP) of the upper trapezius muscle. A total of 40 patients were randomly divided into three groups. All patients had active MTrP in one side of the upper trapezius muscles. Group I was treated with TENS and trapezius-stretching exercises; Group II was treated with EMS and trapezius-stretching exercises and Group III, the control group, had only trapezius-stretching exercises. Subjective pain intensity with VAS, range of motion (ROM), and pain threshold (PT) were assessed before, immediately after two week treatment and 3 months after treatment. Group I had a statistically significant reduction in VAS (P<0.01), increase in PT and ROM (p<0.05) at end of the treatment when compared with the control group. Only VAS was significantly improved (p<0.05) in the Group II patients. At the end of the third month, both groups showed highly significant improvement (p<0.01) in VAS and PT (but not ROM). There was no statistical difference in none of parameters between EMS and TENS groups in any time (p>0.05). In conclusion, TENS seem to be more effective immediately after treatment but in long term evaluation there is no significant superiority of two electrotherapy techniques on each other.

摘要

本研究旨在比较经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)和肌肉电刺激疗法(EMS)对上斜方肌肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)的影响。总共40例患者被随机分为三组。所有患者一侧上斜方肌均有活跃的MTrP。第一组接受TENS和斜方肌拉伸练习治疗;第二组接受EMS和斜方肌拉伸练习治疗;第三组为对照组,仅进行斜方肌拉伸练习。在治疗前、治疗两周后即刻以及治疗后3个月评估视觉模拟评分法(VAS)的主观疼痛强度、活动范围(ROM)和疼痛阈值(PT)。与对照组相比,第一组在治疗结束时VAS有统计学显著降低(<公式>P<0.01</公式>),PT和ROM增加(<公式>p<0.05</公式>)。第二组患者仅VAS有显著改善(<公式>p<0.05</公式>)。在第三个月末,两组在VAS和PT方面均显示出高度显著改善(<公式>p<0.01</公式>)(但ROM未改善)。在任何时间,EMS组和TENS组之间的任何参数均无统计学差异(<公式>p>0.05</公式>)。总之,TENS在治疗后即刻似乎更有效,但在长期评估中,两种电疗技术之间没有显著优势。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two different techniques of electrotherapy on myofascial pain.两种不同电疗法治疗肌筋膜疼痛的比较。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2002 Jan 1;16(1):11-6. doi: 10.3233/bmr-2002-16103.
2
The immediate effectiveness of electrical nerve stimulation and electrical muscle stimulation on myofascial trigger points.电神经刺激和电肌肉刺激对肌筋膜触发点的即时效果。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Nov-Dec;76(6):471-6. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199711000-00007.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Single Botulinum Toxin Type A (Botox®) Injection for Relief of Upper Trapezius Myofascial Trigger Point: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.A型肉毒毒素(保妥适®)单次注射缓解上斜方肌肌筋膜触发点的疗效与安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Dec;98(12):1231-6.
4
Comparison of effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Kinesio Taping added to exercises in patients with myofascial pain syndrome.经皮电刺激神经疗法与肌内效贴布结合运动疗法对肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者的疗效比较
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(2):291-298. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150503.
5
Treatment of myofascial pain.肌筋膜疼痛的治疗
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jan-Feb;79(1):48-52. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200001000-00011.
6
Comparison of miniscalpel-needle release, acupuncture needling, and stretching exercise to trigger point in myofascial pain syndrome.肌筋膜疼痛综合征中小针刀松解、针刺与伸展运动治疗扳机点的比较。
Clin J Pain. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(3):251-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b8cdc8.
7
Effects of burst-type transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cervical range of motion and latent myofascial trigger point pain sensitivity.爆发型经皮神经电刺激对颈椎活动度和潜伏肌筋膜触发点疼痛敏感性的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;92(9):1353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.010.
8
Low-frequency high-intensity versus medium-frequency low-intensity combined therapy in the management of active myofascial trigger points: A randomized controlled trial.低频高强度与中频低强度联合治疗对活跃性肌筋膜触发点的管理:一项随机对照试验。
Physiother Res Int. 2018 Oct;23(4):e1737. doi: 10.1002/pri.1737. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Efficacy of Myofascial Release With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Conductive Glove for Neck Myofascial Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.经皮电神经刺激导电手套肌筋膜松解术治疗颈部肌筋膜综合征的疗效:一项随机临床试验研究
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2023 Jun-Dec;46(5-9):254-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
10
Immediate effects of various physical therapeutic modalities on cervical myofascial pain and trigger-point sensitivity.各种物理治疗方式对颈部肌筋膜疼痛和触发点敏感性的即时影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Oct;83(10):1406-14. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34834.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of six biophysical agents on neck pain rehabilitation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.六种生物物理因子对颈部疼痛康复的比较效果:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08812-1.
2
Efficacy of Dry Needling Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Neck Pain Due to Myofascial Trigger Points: A Randomized Controlled Trial.肌筋膜触发点所致颈部疼痛患者中干针疗法与经皮电刺激神经疗法的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2023 Mar 21;15(3):e36473. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36473. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.
对 381 项评估经皮神经电刺激(TENS)缓解疼痛的临床研究特征进行描述:改善未来研究的 Meta-TENS 研究的二次分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jun 14;58(6):803. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060803.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Electro-Thumbtack Needle Therapy for Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: Protocol for a Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.电钉针疗法治疗慢性颈痛患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、假对照试验方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 29;9:872362. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.872362. eCollection 2022.
5
Textile Electrodes: Influence of Knitting Construction and Pressure on the Contact Impedance.纺织电极:编织结构和压力对接触阻抗的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 24;21(5):1578. doi: 10.3390/s21051578.
6
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic neck pain.经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)治疗慢性颈部疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 12;12(12):CD011927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011927.pub2.
7
Effect of Acupuncture on Chronic Pelvic Pain Secondary to Abdominal Myofascial Syndrome Not Responsive to Local Anesthetic Block: A Pilot Study.针刺疗法对腹部肌筋膜综合征继发的慢性盆腔疼痛且对局部麻醉阻滞无反应的疗效:一项初步研究。
Med Acupunct. 2017 Dec 1;29(6):397-404. doi: 10.1089/acu.2017.1248.
8
Short-term effects of self-massage combined with home exercise on pain, daily activity, and autonomic function in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome.自我按摩联合家庭锻炼对肌筋膜疼痛功能障碍综合征患者疼痛、日常活动及自主神经功能的短期影响
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jan;27(1):217-21. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.217. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
9
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders.机械性颈部疾病的锻炼方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 28;1(1):CD004250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004250.pub5.