• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知道何时逃跑,知道何时躲藏:行为差异能否解释两种同域蜥蜴入侵成功的差异?

Know when to run, know when to hide: can behavioral differences explain the divergent invasion success of two sympatric lizards?

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, Monash University Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2011 Nov;1(3):278-89. doi: 10.1002/ece3.22.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.22
PMID:22393500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3287307/
Abstract

Invasive species represent a select subset of organisms that have successfully transitioned through each stage of the introduction process (transportation, establishment, and spread). Although there is a growing realization that behavior plays a critical role in invasion success, few studies have focused on the initial stages of introduction. We examined whether differences in the grouping tendencies and exploratory behavior of two sympatric lizard species could contribute to their divergent invasion success. While the nondirected activity of the two species did not differ, the invasive delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata) was found to be more exploratory than the congeneric noninvasive garden skink (L. guichenoti), which enabled it to more effectively locate novel environments and basking site resources. The delicate skink also exhibited a greater tendency to hide, which may act to enhance its probability of ensnarement in freight and cargo and decrease its likelihood of detection during transit. The grouping tendencies of the two species did not differ. Together, our results suggest that while the two species have an equivalent "opportunity" for unintentional human-assisted transportation, several pre-existing behavioral traits may enhance the success of the delicate skink in negotiating the initial stages of the introduction process, and subsequent post-establishment spread.

摘要

入侵物种代表了成功通过引入过程(运输、建立和传播)各个阶段的生物体的一个精选子集。尽管越来越多的人认识到行为在入侵成功中起着关键作用,但很少有研究关注引入的初始阶段。我们研究了两种同域蜥蜴物种在分组倾向和探索行为方面的差异是否有助于它们不同的入侵成功。虽然两种物种的无定向活动没有差异,但入侵的脆弱石龙子(Lampropholis delicata)比同属的非入侵花园石龙子(L. guichenoti)更具探索性,这使它能够更有效地找到新的环境和晒斑资源。脆弱石龙子也表现出更大的隐藏倾向,这可能会增加它在货物和货物中被捕获的概率,并降低它在运输过程中被发现的可能性。两种物种的分组倾向没有差异。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,尽管这两个物种都有同等的“机会”被非故意的人为运输,但一些预先存在的行为特征可能会增强脆弱石龙子在谈判引入过程的初始阶段以及随后的建立后传播的成功机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/44f5a2447352/ece30001-0278-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/f128e0aa1f95/ece30001-0278-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/a92c8c5925d6/ece30001-0278-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/0c8f43aaba89/ece30001-0278-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/44f5a2447352/ece30001-0278-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/f128e0aa1f95/ece30001-0278-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/a92c8c5925d6/ece30001-0278-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/0c8f43aaba89/ece30001-0278-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62eb/3287307/44f5a2447352/ece30001-0278-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Know when to run, know when to hide: can behavioral differences explain the divergent invasion success of two sympatric lizards?知道何时逃跑,知道何时躲藏:行为差异能否解释两种同域蜥蜴入侵成功的差异?
Ecol Evol. 2011 Nov;1(3):278-89. doi: 10.1002/ece3.22.
2
Impact of tail loss on the behaviour and locomotor performance of two sympatric Lampropholis skink species.断尾对两种共生蜥形目石龙子行为和运动表现的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034732. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
3
Biosecurity interceptions of an invasive lizard: origin of stowaways and human-assisted spread within New Zealand.生物安全截获入侵蜥蜴:偷渡者的起源和在新西兰境内的人为协助传播。
Evol Appl. 2013 Feb;6(2):324-39. doi: 10.1111/eva.12002. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
4
Does invasion success reflect superior cognitive ability? A case study of two congeneric lizard species (Lampropholis, Scincidae).入侵成功是否反映出更高的认知能力?两种同属蜥蜴物种(变色树蜥,鬣蜥科)的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e86271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086271. eCollection 2014.
5
Phylogeographic divergence in the widespread delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata) corresponds to dry habitat barriers in eastern Australia.广泛分布的脆弱石龙子(Lampropholis delicata)的系统地理分化与澳大利亚东部干旱生境障碍相对应。
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Jul 4;11:191. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-191.
6
Biological invasions as a selective filter driving behavioral divergence.生物入侵作为一种选择性过滤器,推动行为分歧。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 11;13(1):5996. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33755-2.
7
How do the physiological traits of a lizard change during its invasion of an oceanic island?蜥蜴在侵入海洋岛屿的过程中,其生理特征是如何变化的?
Oecologia. 2022 Mar;198(3):567-578. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-05054-y. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
8
Maternal investment and early thermal conditions affect performance and antipredator responses.母体投资和早期热环境会影响(个体的)表现及反捕食反应。
Behav Ecol. 2024 Apr 26;35(4):arae035. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arae035. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
9
An experimental study of the effects of weed invasion on lizard phenotypes.杂草入侵对蜥蜴表型影响的实验研究
Oecologia. 2007 Sep;153(3):775-85. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0775-2. Epub 2007 May 31.
10
Can behavioral and personality traits influence the success of unintentional species introductions?行为和性格特征会影响非有意物种引入的成功吗?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan;27(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive processes are robust to early environmental conditions in two lizard species.认知过程对两种蜥蜴物种的早期环境条件具有较强的适应性。
Behav Ecol. 2025 May 30;36(4):araf048. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araf048. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Skinks on a Plane: Does Human-Mediated Transportation Impact the Behaviour of an Invasive Lizard?飞机上的石龙子:人类介导的运输会影响入侵蜥蜴的行为吗?
Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 18;14(12):e70748. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70748. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Different behavioral profiles between invasive and native nudibranchs: means for invasion success?

本文引用的文献

1
ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS.分析统计检验表
Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x.
2
Phylogeographic divergence in the widespread delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata) corresponds to dry habitat barriers in eastern Australia.广泛分布的脆弱石龙子(Lampropholis delicata)的系统地理分化与澳大利亚东部干旱生境障碍相对应。
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Jul 4;11:191. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-191.
3
Social personality polymorphism and the spread of invasive species: a model.社会人格多态性与入侵物种的传播:一个模型。
入侵性裸鳃亚目动物和本地裸鳃亚目动物之间不同的行为特征:入侵成功的方式?
Curr Zool. 2024 Jun 11;70(3):406-417. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoae028. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
A misleading tail: A long-term study of reptile responses to multiple disturbances undermined by a change in surveying techniques.误导性的尾巴:一项长期研究表明,由于调查技术的改变,爬行动物对多种干扰的反应受到了破坏。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0305518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305518. eCollection 2024.
5
Biological invasions as a selective filter driving behavioral divergence.生物入侵作为一种选择性过滤器,推动行为分歧。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 11;13(1):5996. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33755-2.
6
Anthropogenically modified habitats favor bigger and bolder lizards.人为改造的栖息地有利于体型更大、胆子更大的蜥蜴生存。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jan 31;11(4):1586-1597. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7124. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Urban invaders are not bold risk-takers: a study of 3 invasive lizards in Southern California.城市入侵者并非大胆的冒险者:对南加州三种入侵蜥蜴的研究。
Curr Zool. 2020 Dec;66(6):657-665. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoaa015. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
Bigger doesn't mean bolder: behavioral variation of four wild rodent species to novelty and predation risk following a fast-slow continuum.体型大并不意味着更勇敢:四种野生啮齿动物在遵循快慢连续体的情况下对新事物和捕食风险的行为变化。
Front Zool. 2020 Sep 21;17:27. doi: 10.1186/s12983-020-00376-8. eCollection 2020.
9
Behavioral variation post-invasion: Resemblance in some, but not all, behavioral patterns among invasive and native praying mantids.入侵后的行为变异:入侵的螳螂和本地螳螂在部分而非全部行为模式上存在相似性。
Behav Processes. 2018 Aug;153:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 23.
10
Repeatability and correlation of physiological traits: Do ectotherms have a "thermal type"?生理特征的重复性与相关性:变温动物有“热型”吗?
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 22;7(2):710-719. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2632. eCollection 2017 Jan.
Am Nat. 2011 Mar;177(3):273-87. doi: 10.1086/658174.
4
Exploiting Allee effects for managing biological invasions.利用聚群效应来管理生物入侵。
Ecol Lett. 2011 Jun;14(6):615-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01614.x. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
5
Personality-dependent dispersal in the invasive mosquitofish: group composition matters.个性依赖扩散:入侵食蚊鱼的群居构成至关重要。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 7;278(1712):1670-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1892. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
6
Individual variation in behavioural plasticity: direct and indirect effects of boldness, exploration and sociability on habituation to predators in lizards.个体行为可塑性的变化:蜥蜴对捕食者的习惯化过程中,大胆、探索和社交行为的直接和间接影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 22;278(1703):266-73. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1194. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
7
The accidental introduction of invasive animals as hitchhikers through inanimate pathways: a New Zealand perspective.通过无生命途径作为搭便车者意外引入入侵动物:新西兰的视角。
Rev Sci Tech. 2010 Apr;29(1):123-33. doi: 10.20506/rst.29.1.1970.
8
Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness.外来种有何不同?评估入侵性决定因素的比较方法的概念框架。
Ecol Lett. 2010 Aug 1;13(8):947-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01503.x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
9
Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis).入侵性食蚊鱼( Gambusia affinis )的个性特征和扩散倾向。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1571-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2128. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
10
Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success.你的移动方式中的某些因素:扩散路径影响入侵成功率。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):136-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.007. Epub 2009 Jan 27.