• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究能力与文化(RCC)工具的验证:在个人、团队和组织层面衡量研究能力与文化

Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels.

作者信息

Holden Libby, Pager Susan, Golenko Xanthe, Ware Robert S

机构信息

School of Medicine, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(1):62-7. doi: 10.1071/PY10081.

DOI:10.1071/PY10081
PMID:22394664
Abstract

Research capacity building (RCB) in Australia has recently focussed on strategies that take a whole of system approach to developing research culture at individual, team and organisation levels. Although a theoretical framework exists, no tool has been published that quantitatively measures the effectiveness of RCB interventions aimed at these three levels. A sample of 134 allied health workers was used to validate the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool. Item level analysis was undertaken using Cronbach's α and exploratory factor analysis, and test-retest reliability was examined using intra-class correlations (ICC). The tool had one factor emerge for each domain, with excellent internal consistency for organisation, team and individual domains (α=0.95, 0.96 and 0.96 respectively; and factor loadings ranges of 0.58-0.89, 0.65-0.89 and 0.59-0.93 respectively). The overall mean score (total) for each domain was: 5.4 (inter-quartile range 3.9-7.7), 4.4 (IQR 2.6-6.1) and 3.9 (IQR 2.9-6) for the organisation, team and individual domains respectively. Test-retest reliability was strong for each domain: organisation ICC=0.77, team ICC=0.83 and individual ICC=0.82. The RCC tool has three domains measuring research capacity and culture at organisation, team and individual levels. It demonstrates excellent internal consistency and strong test-retest reliability.

摘要

澳大利亚的研究能力建设(RCB)最近聚焦于采用全系统方法在个人、团队和组织层面培育研究文化的策略。尽管存在一个理论框架,但尚未发布能够定量衡量针对这三个层面的RCB干预措施有效性的工具。134名专职医疗人员组成的样本被用于验证研究能力与文化(RCC)工具。使用克朗巴哈α系数和探索性因素分析进行项目层面分析,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)检验重测信度。该工具在每个领域都呈现出一个因素,组织、团队和个人领域的内部一致性极佳(α分别为0.95、0.96和0.96;因素载荷范围分别为0.58 - 0.89、0.65 - 0.89和0.59 - 0.93)。每个领域的总体平均得分(总分)分别为:组织领域5.4(四分位距3.9 - 7.7)、团队领域4.4(四分位距2.6 - 6.1)和个人领域3.9(四分位距2.9 - 6)。每个领域的重测信度都很强:组织领域ICC = 0.77,团队领域ICC = 0.83,个人领域ICC = 0.82。RCC工具具有三个领域,用于衡量组织、团队和个人层面的研究能力与文化。它展现出极佳的内部一致性和很强的重测信度。

相似文献

1
Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels.研究能力与文化(RCC)工具的验证:在个人、团队和组织层面衡量研究能力与文化
Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(1):62-7. doi: 10.1071/PY10081.
2
Evaluating a team-based approach to research capacity building using a matched-pairs study design.使用配对研究设计评估基于团队的研究能力建设方法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 12;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-16.
3
Development and psychometric testing of the Clinician Readiness for Measuring Outcomes Scale.临床医生测量结果量表的编制与心理测量学测试
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;15(1):76-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00957.x.
4
Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact.联合健康研究职位:对其影响的定性评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 6;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4.
5
Developing a tool to measure contributions to medication-related processes in family practice.开发一种工具来衡量家庭医疗中与药物治疗相关流程的贡献。
J Interprof Care. 2008 Jan;22(1):17-29. doi: 10.1080/13561820701828845.
6
Determination of the psychometric properties of a behavioural marking system for obstetrical team training using high-fidelity simulation.使用高保真模拟确定行为标记系统在产科团队培训中的心理测量特性。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):78-82. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000296. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
7
Measuring team development in clinical care settings.衡量临床护理环境中的团队发展。
Fam Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;45(10):691-700.
8
Developing capacities in aging studies in the Middle East: Implementation of an Arabic version of the CANE IV among community-dwelling older adults in Lebanon.在中东地区发展老龄化研究能力:在黎巴嫩的社区居住的老年人中实施 CANE IV 的阿拉伯语版本。
Aging Ment Health. 2011 Jul 1;15(5):605-17. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.562351.
9
A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers' perspective.组织在构建联合健康研究能力中的作用的主题分析:高级管理人员的视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 27;12:276. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-276.
10
Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the self-report health-related quality of life measure for children and adolescents with epilepsy.中文版癫痫儿童及青少年自我报告健康相关生活质量量表的内部一致性和重测信度
Epilepsy Behav. 2006 Aug;9(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour Model and Theoretical Domains Framework to Understand Barriers and Enablers of Research Capacity and Culture for Speech and Language Therapy Staff.运用能力、机会、动机-行为模型及理论领域框架来理解言语和语言治疗人员研究能力与文化的障碍及促进因素。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70116. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70116.
2
Approaches and tools to measure individual-level research experience, activities, and outcomes: A narrative review.衡量个体层面研究经历、活动和成果的方法与工具:一项叙述性综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug 11;9(1):e161. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10076. eCollection 2025.
3
The development, validity, and reliability of the Researcher Investment Tool.
研究者投入工具的开发、效度和信度。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Aug 11;9(1):e160. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.673. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploring the research interest, capacity and culture of NHS staff in South-East Scotland and changes in attitudes to research following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a qualitative study.探索苏格兰东南部国民保健服务体系工作人员的研究兴趣、能力和文化以及在新冠疫情后对研究态度的变化:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 18;25(1):1102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13074-0.
5
Embedding research into the organisational structure of smaller rural hospitals: building research culture and capacity and understanding perceived rural health workforce benefit.将研究融入小型农村医院的组织结构:营造研究文化与能力,理解农村卫生人力感知到的益处。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13107-8.
6
Mechanisms to build research capacity in the rural health workplace: a realist synthesis.农村卫生工作场所研究能力建设机制:一项实在论综合分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 19;12:1584904. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1584904. eCollection 2025.
7
Baseline assessments of research capacity, capability and culture in UK local authorities: reflections from evaluators embedded in Health Determinants Research Collaborations.英国地方当局研究能力、实力和文化的基线评估:来自健康决定因素研究合作项目内部评估人员的思考
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 May 26;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01323-x.
8
Embedding research within occupational therapy pre-registration training: A concept mapping study engaging staff and student voices.将研究融入职业治疗预注册培训:一项汇聚员工和学生声音的概念映射研究。
Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Oct;87(10):645-656. doi: 10.1177/03080226241253102. Epub 2024 May 22.
9
Differences in personality and character traits of occupational therapy researchers and non-researchers: A cross-sectional study.职业治疗研究人员与非研究人员在人格和性格特征上的差异:一项横断面研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Apr;72(2):e70015. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70015.
10
Development of a capability framework for Allied Health research careers in health services.卫生服务领域联合健康研究职业能力框架的制定。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12274-y.