Holden Libby, Pager Susan, Golenko Xanthe, Ware Robert S
School of Medicine, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia.
Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(1):62-7. doi: 10.1071/PY10081.
Research capacity building (RCB) in Australia has recently focussed on strategies that take a whole of system approach to developing research culture at individual, team and organisation levels. Although a theoretical framework exists, no tool has been published that quantitatively measures the effectiveness of RCB interventions aimed at these three levels. A sample of 134 allied health workers was used to validate the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool. Item level analysis was undertaken using Cronbach's α and exploratory factor analysis, and test-retest reliability was examined using intra-class correlations (ICC). The tool had one factor emerge for each domain, with excellent internal consistency for organisation, team and individual domains (α=0.95, 0.96 and 0.96 respectively; and factor loadings ranges of 0.58-0.89, 0.65-0.89 and 0.59-0.93 respectively). The overall mean score (total) for each domain was: 5.4 (inter-quartile range 3.9-7.7), 4.4 (IQR 2.6-6.1) and 3.9 (IQR 2.9-6) for the organisation, team and individual domains respectively. Test-retest reliability was strong for each domain: organisation ICC=0.77, team ICC=0.83 and individual ICC=0.82. The RCC tool has three domains measuring research capacity and culture at organisation, team and individual levels. It demonstrates excellent internal consistency and strong test-retest reliability.
澳大利亚的研究能力建设(RCB)最近聚焦于采用全系统方法在个人、团队和组织层面培育研究文化的策略。尽管存在一个理论框架,但尚未发布能够定量衡量针对这三个层面的RCB干预措施有效性的工具。134名专职医疗人员组成的样本被用于验证研究能力与文化(RCC)工具。使用克朗巴哈α系数和探索性因素分析进行项目层面分析,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)检验重测信度。该工具在每个领域都呈现出一个因素,组织、团队和个人领域的内部一致性极佳(α分别为0.95、0.96和0.96;因素载荷范围分别为0.58 - 0.89、0.65 - 0.89和0.59 - 0.93)。每个领域的总体平均得分(总分)分别为:组织领域5.4(四分位距3.9 - 7.7)、团队领域4.4(四分位距2.6 - 6.1)和个人领域3.9(四分位距2.9 - 6)。每个领域的重测信度都很强:组织领域ICC = 0.77,团队领域ICC = 0.83,个人领域ICC = 0.82。RCC工具具有三个领域,用于衡量组织、团队和个人层面的研究能力与文化。它展现出极佳的内部一致性和很强的重测信度。