• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织在构建联合健康研究能力中的作用的主题分析:高级管理人员的视角。

A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers' perspective.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Logan Campus, Griffith University, University Drive Meadowbrook, Meadowbrook Q 4131, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 27;12:276. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-276.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-12-276
PMID:22920443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3464180/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based practice aims to achieve better health outcomes in the community. It relies on high quality research to inform policy and practice; however research in primary health care continues to lag behind that of other medical professions. The literature suggests that research capacity building (RCB) functions across four levels; individual, team, organisation and external environment. Many RCB interventions are aimed at an individual or team level, yet evidence indicates that many barriers to RCB occur at an organisational or external environment level. This study asks senior managers from a large healthcare organisation to identify the barriers and enablers to RCB. The paper then describes strategies for building allied health (AH) research capacity at an organisational level from a senior managers' perspective.

METHODS

This qualitative study is part of a larger collaborative RCB project. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with nine allied health senior managers. Recorded interviews were transcribed and NVivo was used to analyse findings and emergent themes were defined.

RESULTS

The dominant themes indicate that the organisation plays an integral role in building AH research capacity and is the critical link in creating synergy across the four levels of RCB. The organisation can achieve this by incorporating research into its core business with a whole of organisation approach including its mission, vision and strategic planning. Critical success factors include: developing a co-ordinated and multidisciplinary approach to attain critical mass of research-active AH and enhance learning and development; support from senior managers demonstrated through structures, processes and systems designed to facilitate research; forming partnerships to increase collaboration and sharing of resources and knowledge; and establishing in internal framework to promote recognition for research and career path opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies four key themes: whole of organisation approach; structures, processes and systems; partnerships and collaboration; and dedicated research centres, units and positions. These themes form the foundation of a model which can be applied to assist in achieving synergy across the four levels of RCB, overcome barriers and create an environment that supports and facilitates research development in AH.

摘要

背景

循证实践旨在实现社区更好的健康结果。它依赖于高质量的研究来为政策和实践提供信息;然而,基层医疗保健的研究仍然落后于其他医学专业。文献表明,研究能力建设(RCB)在四个层面上发挥作用;个人、团队、组织和外部环境。许多 RCB 干预措施针对个人或团队层面,但有证据表明,RCB 的许多障碍发生在组织或外部环境层面。本研究要求来自大型医疗机构的高级管理人员识别 RCB 的障碍和促成因素。本文从高级管理人员的角度描述了在组织层面上建立辅助健康(AH)研究能力的策略。

方法

这项定性研究是一个更大的合作 RCB 项目的一部分。对 9 名辅助健康高级管理人员进行了半结构化深入访谈。记录的访谈被转录,使用 NVivo 对结果进行分析,并确定了新兴主题。

结果

主导主题表明,组织在建立 AH 研究能力方面发挥着不可或缺的作用,是在 RCB 的四个层面上建立协同作用的关键环节。该组织可以通过将研究纳入其核心业务,采用全组织方法,包括其使命、愿景和战略规划来实现这一目标。关键成功因素包括:发展协调一致的多学科方法,以获得大量的研究活跃的 AH,并加强学习和发展;通过旨在促进研究的结构、流程和系统来展示高级管理人员的支持;建立伙伴关系,以增加合作和资源知识共享;并建立内部框架,以促进对研究的认可和职业机会。

结论

本研究确定了四个关键主题:全组织方法;结构、流程和系统;伙伴关系和合作;以及专门的研究中心、单位和职位。这些主题构成了一个模型的基础,该模型可用于协助实现 RCB 的四个层面的协同作用,克服障碍,并创造一个支持和促进 AH 研究发展的环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82d6/3464180/b19a1557fb07/1472-6963-12-276-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82d6/3464180/b19a1557fb07/1472-6963-12-276-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82d6/3464180/b19a1557fb07/1472-6963-12-276-1.jpg

相似文献

1
A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers' perspective.组织在构建联合健康研究能力中的作用的主题分析:高级管理人员的视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 27;12:276. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-276.
2
A participatory action research approach to strengthening health managers' capacity at district level in Eastern Uganda.参与式行动研究方法在乌干达东部加强地区卫生管理者能力。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 28;15(Suppl 2):110. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0273-x.
3
Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review.将研究文化嵌入到辅助健康实践中的框架:快速综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Mar 21;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0304-2.
4
Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact.联合健康研究职位:对其影响的定性评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 6;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4.
5
A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care.一个评估医疗保健领域研究能力建设的框架。
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Oct 27;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-44.
6
Evaluating a team-based approach to research capacity building using a matched-pairs study design.使用配对研究设计评估基于团队的研究能力建设方法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 12;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-16.
7
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Exploring the research culture of nurses and allied health professionals (AHPs) in a research-focused and a non-research-focused healthcare organisation in the UK.探索英国一家以研究为重点和一家非以研究为重点的医疗机构中护士和辅助医疗专业人员(AHPs)的研究文化。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):e1462-e1476. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14264. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour Model and Theoretical Domains Framework to Understand Barriers and Enablers of Research Capacity and Culture for Speech and Language Therapy Staff.运用能力、机会、动机-行为模型及理论领域框架来理解言语和语言治疗人员研究能力与文化的障碍及促进因素。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70116. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70116.
2
Mechanisms to build research capacity in the rural health workplace: a realist synthesis.农村卫生工作场所研究能力建设机制:一项实在论综合分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 19;12:1584904. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1584904. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating a team-based approach to research capacity building using a matched-pairs study design.使用配对研究设计评估基于团队的研究能力建设方法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 12;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-16.
2
Motivators, enablers, and barriers to building allied health research capacity.构建辅助健康研究能力的激励因素、促成因素和障碍。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:53-9. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S27638. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
3
Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels.
Student Engagement in Medical Research Curriculum Development Strategies: A Comprehensive Approach Utilizing Mixed-Methods Study and SWOT-TOWS-AHP Analysis.
学生参与医学研究课程开发策略:一种运用混合方法研究及SWOT-TOWS-AHP分析的综合方法
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 14;35(2):741-754. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02226-2. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Embedding a culture of research in Canadian community hospitals: a qualitative study.在加拿大社区医院植入研究文化:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01243-2.
5
Articulating the ultimate objectives of research capacity strengthening programmes: Why this is important and how we might achieve it.明确研究能力增强计划的最终目标:为什么这很重要以及我们如何实现它。
F1000Res. 2024 Aug 8;13:909. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.153447.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Enablers and Barriers of Research Engagement Among Clinician Researchers: Nursing, Allied Health and Medical Professionals.临床研究人员(护士、专职医疗人员和医学专业人员)参与研究的促进因素和障碍
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 21;17:4075-4087. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S463837. eCollection 2024.
7
Exploring healthcare workers' perceptions of child health research at Kamuzu Central Hospital, Malawi: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.探索马拉维卡姆祖中央医院医护人员对儿童健康研究的看法:一项阐释性现象学分析。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Aug 20;22(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00938-5.
8
Challenges of biomedical research collaboration in India: Perceptions of Indian and international researchers.印度生物医学研究合作的挑战:印度和国际研究人员的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0305159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305159. eCollection 2024.
9
Understanding barriers and facilitators to palliative and end-of-life care research: a mixed method study of generalist and specialist health, social care, and research professionals.理解姑息治疗和临终关怀研究的障碍和促进因素:一项针对全科和专科卫生、社会保健以及研究专业人员的混合方法研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jun 25;23(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01488-2.
10
A Realist Evaluation of Social Care Practitioners' Experiences With and Understanding of Applied Healthcare Research.社会保健从业者对应用医疗保健研究的体验和理解的现实主义评价。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241248130. doi: 10.1177/00469580241248130.
研究能力与文化(RCC)工具的验证:在个人、团队和组织层面衡量研究能力与文化
Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(1):62-7. doi: 10.1071/PY10081.
4
Evidence-based practice in everyday clinical practice: strategies for change in a tertiary occupational therapy department.日常临床实践中的循证实践:三级职业治疗科室的变革策略
Aust Occup Ther J. 2008 Jun;55(2):79-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00669.x.
5
What can management theories offer evidence-based practice? A comparative analysis of measurement tools for organisational context.管理理论能为循证实践提供什么?组织背景衡量工具的对比分析。
Implement Sci. 2009 May 19;4:28. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-28.
6
Stakeholders' perceptions of a research capacity development project for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.利益相关者对护士、助产士和专职医疗专业人员研究能力发展项目的看法。
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Apr;16(3):315-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00801.x.
7
A quality improvement tool to assess self-management support in primary care.一种用于评估初级保健中自我管理支持的质量改进工具。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Jul;33(7):408-16. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33047-x.
8
Primary health care research--essential but disadvantaged.初级卫生保健研究——至关重要却处境不利。
Med J Aust. 2006 Jul 17;185(2):118-20. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00488.x.
9
Setting directions for capacity building in primary health care: a survey of a research network.设定初级卫生保健能力建设方向:一项对研究网络的调查
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Feb 9;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-8.
10
Rehabilitation medicine summit: building research capacity.康复医学峰会:提升研究能力
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):1-7.