Wenke Rachel J, Ward Elizabeth C, Hickman Ingrid, Hulcombe Julie, Phillips Rachel, Mickan Sharon
Clinical Governance, Education and Research (Allied Health), Gold Coast Health, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Southport, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Parklands drive, Southport, Queensland, 4215, Australia.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 6;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4.
Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations.
Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions.
Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors.
The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them.
医疗卫生机构内部设立的研究岗位已被视为提升健康医疗辅助专业人员(AHP)研究能力的一项推动因素;然而,目前对其影响进行正式评估的研究有限。2008年,一项健康从业者行业协议为澳大利亚昆士兰卫生部门的一项研究能力建设计划提供了资金支持,该计划设立了15个新的健康医疗辅助研究岗位。本项目采用定性和现实主义方法,探讨这些研究岗位的影响,以及在各自组织中促进或阻碍其成功的机制。
来自澳大利亚昆士兰六个政府卫生服务机构的44名AHP员工参与了该研究。对担任研究岗位的人员(n = 8)及其直属上级经理(n = 8)进行了个人访谈。还与曾与研究岗位有过接触的临床医生、团队领导和专业负责人进行了四个利益相关者焦点小组访谈。
在个人、团队/服务以及组织/社区层面确定了研究岗位的九个关键成果。这些成果包括临床医生技能发展、研究活动增加、临床和服务变革、研究产出和合作增加、研究及工作场所文化得到加强、健康医疗辅助专业形象提升、研究基础设施发展以及研究岗位人员的专业发展。确定了影响这些成果的不同机制。这些机制按与(1)研究岗位本身、(2)组织因素和(3)实施因素相关的机制进行了分类。
本研究结果凸显了研究岗位对不同政府医疗卫生服务机构中的个人、团队和临床服务的潜在价值,并证明了这些岗位对提升健康医疗辅助专业的内部和外部形象的影响。研究结果基于健康医疗辅助研究岗位不断涌现的证据基础,对多个利益相关者(即研究岗位人员、AHP及其管理人员、大学合作伙伴和全州行政人员)具有重要意义。为所有利益相关者提供了关键建议,以增强这些岗位的持续影响力,并为支持这些岗位争取更多岗位和资源提供潜在支持。