• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过词汇相似性索引检查和引导词汇规范。

Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes.

机构信息

Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):998-1006. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0195-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-012-0195-z
PMID:22396137
Abstract

In psychology, lexical norms related to the semantic properties of words, such as concreteness and valence, are important research resources. Collecting such norms by asking judges to rate the words is very time consuming, which strongly limits the number of words that compose them. In the present article, we present a technique for estimating lexical norms based on the latent semantic analysis of a corpus. The analyses conducted emphasize the technique's effectiveness for several semantic dimensions. In addition to the extension of norms, this technique can be used to check human ratings to identify words for which the rating is very different from the corpus-based estimate.

摘要

在心理学中,与词汇的语义属性(如具体性和情感性)相关的词汇规范是重要的研究资源。通过让评判者对词汇进行评分来收集这些规范非常耗时,这极大地限制了组成词汇规范的词汇数量。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于语料库潜在语义分析的词汇规范估计技术。所进行的分析强调了该技术在多个语义维度上的有效性。除了扩展规范外,该技术还可用于检查人类评分,以识别那些评分与基于语料库的估计值差异很大的词汇。

相似文献

1
Checking and bootstrapping lexical norms by means of word similarity indexes.通过词汇相似性索引检查和引导词汇规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):998-1006. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0195-z.
2
Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance.利用词汇共现统计重现情感规范:预测效价、唤醒度和支配性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1584-98. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.941296. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
3
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.格拉斯哥规范:9 个尺度上对 5500 个单词的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3.
4
Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words.1100个中文词汇的效价、唤醒度、具体性、熟悉度、可想象性和语境可用性规范
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1374-1385. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2.
5
The Nature of Word Associations in Sentence Contexts.句子语境中的词汇联想的本质。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;69(2):104-110. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000547. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
6
Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.1,659 个法文字汇的具体性规范:与其他心理语言学变数及字词辨识时间的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2366-2387. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1014-y.
7
How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables?基于语料库的方法在推断心理语言学变量方面有多有用?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1623-42. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.988735. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
8
Semantic gender: Norms for 24,000 Dutch words and its role in word meaning.语义性别:24000 个荷兰单词的规范及其在词义中的作用。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Jan;56(1):113-125. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02032-x. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
9
Quantifying social semantics: An inclusive definition of socialness and ratings for 8388 English words.量化社会语义:对 8388 个英语单词的社会性和评价的包容性定义。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):461-473. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01810-x. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
10
Semantic similarity: normative ratings for 185 Spanish noun triplets.语义相似度:185个西班牙语名词三元组的规范评级
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Sep;47(3):788-99. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0501-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The Semantic Similarity Effect on Short-Term Memory: Null Effects of Affectively Defined Semantic Similarity.语义相似性对短期记忆的影响:情感定义的语义相似性的零效应
J Cogn. 2024 Feb 12;7(1):24. doi: 10.5334/joc.349. eCollection 2024.
2
Can large language models help augment English psycholinguistic datasets?大型语言模型能否帮助扩充英语心理语言学数据集?
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6082-6100. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02337-z. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
3
The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Extrapolating affective values for 38,000+ Chinese words via a computational model.
善、恶与矛盾情感:通过计算模型推断38000多个中文词汇的情感价值。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5386-5405. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02274-3. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
Extrapolation of affective norms using transformer-based neural networks and its application to experimental stimuli selection.基于Transformer 神经网络的情感规范外推及其在实验刺激选择中的应用。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4716-4731. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02212-3. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
5
Independency of Coding for Affective Similarities and for Word Co-occurrences in Temporal Perisylvian Neocortex.颞叶周围新皮质中情感相似性编码与词共现编码的独立性。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 Apr 11;4(2):257-279. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00095. eCollection 2023.
6
Semantic gender: Norms for 24,000 Dutch words and its role in word meaning.语义性别:24000 个荷兰单词的规范及其在词义中的作用。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Jan;56(1):113-125. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02032-x. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
7
Rating norms should be calculated from cumulative link mixed effects models.评分规范应根据累积链接混合效应模型进行计算。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Aug;55(5):2175-2196. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01814-7. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
8
Colexification Networks Encode Affective Meaning.共现词网络编码情感意义。
Affect Sci. 2021 May 15;2(2):99-111. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00033-1. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Distributional Measures of Semantic Abstraction.语义抽象的分布度量
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 8;4:796756. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.796756. eCollection 2021.
10
Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry.微观诗歌与神经认知诗学:联想对诗歌接受的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:737756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737756. eCollection 2021.