• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于估计配体结合亲和力的MM/PBSA和MM/GBSA方法。

The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.

作者信息

Genheden Samuel, Ryde Ulf

机构信息

University of Southampton, School of Chemistry , Highfield, SO17 1BJ, Southampton , UK.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015 May;10(5):449-61. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
PMID:25835573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4487606/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson-Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor-ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications.

EXPERT OPINION

MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results.

摘要

引言

分子力学能量结合泊松-玻尔兹曼或广义玻恩及表面积连续介质溶剂化(MM/PBSA和MM/GBSA)方法是估算小分子配体与生物大分子结合自由能的常用方法。它们通常基于受体-配体复合物的分子动力学模拟,因此在准确性和计算量方面介于经验评分和严格的炼金术微扰方法之间。它们已被应用于大量系统,取得了不同程度的成功。

涵盖领域

作者回顾了MM/PBSA和MM/GBSA方法在计算配体结合亲和力方面的应用,重点是校准、测试和验证,以及改进这些方法的尝试,而非具体应用。

专家观点

MM/PBSA和MM/GBSA因其模块化性质且无需在训练集上进行计算而颇具吸引力。它们已成功用于重现实验结果并使其合理化,以及改进虚拟筛选和对接的结果。然而,它们包含一些粗糙且有问题的近似,例如缺乏构象熵以及结合位点水分子数量和自由能的信息。此外,该方法有许多变体,其性能会因测试系统的不同而有很大差异。同样,大多数用更精确方法(如量子力学计算、可极化力场或改进的溶剂化)改进这些方法的尝试都使结果变差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e4/4487606/a40b3a766dbc/iedc-10-449-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e4/4487606/62b6b58f2f26/iedc-10-449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e4/4487606/a40b3a766dbc/iedc-10-449-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e4/4487606/62b6b58f2f26/iedc-10-449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12e4/4487606/a40b3a766dbc/iedc-10-449-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.用于估计配体结合亲和力的MM/PBSA和MM/GBSA方法。
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015 May;10(5):449-61. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2
Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.评估MM/PBSA和MM/GBSA方法的性能。6. 预测蛋白质-蛋白质结合自由能以及对蛋白质-蛋白质对接产生的结合构象进行重新排序的能力。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016 Aug 10;18(32):22129-39. doi: 10.1039/c6cp03670h.
3
Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations.评估 MM/PBSA 和 MM/GBSA 方法的性能。1. 基于分子动力学模拟的结合自由能计算的准确性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Jan 24;51(1):69-82. doi: 10.1021/ci100275a. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
4
End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design.基于 MM/PBSA 和 MM/GBSA 的终点结合自由能计算:在药物设计中的策略与应用。
Chem Rev. 2019 Aug 28;119(16):9478-9508. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00055. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
5
Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.开发并测试一种基于溶剂可及表面积的构象熵计算模型。
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 May 25;52(5):1199-212. doi: 10.1021/ci300064d. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
6
Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes.评估 MM/PBSA 和 MM/GBSA 方法的性能。10. RNA-配体复合物结合亲和力和结合构象的预测可靠性。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2024 Mar 27;26(13):10323-10335. doi: 10.1039/d3cp04366e.
7
Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking.评估分子力学/泊松-玻尔兹曼表面积和分子力学/广义 Born 表面积方法的性能。II. 对接产生的构象排序准确性。
J Comput Chem. 2011 Apr 15;32(5):866-77. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21666. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
8
Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.2015年D3R大挑战中运用对接、MM/GBSA、QM/MM和自由能模拟对HSP90的结合亲和力预测。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9):707-730. doi: 10.1007/s10822-016-9942-z. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.用扩展线性相互作用能方法计算蛋白质-配体结合亲和力:在 D3R 大挑战 3 中的组织蛋白酶 S 集上的应用。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2019 Jan;33(1):105-117. doi: 10.1007/s10822-018-0162-6. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.用分子动力学模拟和终点自由能计算研究了多种蛋白质-配体相互作用中的分子识别。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Oct 28;53(10):2659-70. doi: 10.1021/ci400312v. Epub 2013 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Synthesis and Computational Evaluation of ‑Acetyl-Derived Schiff Bases Incorporating 1,2,4-Triazoles for Dual Inhibition of Prostate Cancer Cells and Carbonic Anhydrases.含1,2,4-三唑的α-乙酰基衍生席夫碱对前列腺癌细胞和碳酸酐酶双重抑制作用的合成与计算评估
ACS Omega. 2025 Aug 22;10(34):38585-38608. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c03271. eCollection 2025 Sep 2.
2
Protein-ligand affinity prediction via Jensen-Shannon divergence of molecular dynamics simulation trajectories.通过分子动力学模拟轨迹的詹森-香农散度进行蛋白质-配体亲和力预测。
Biophys Physicobiol. 2025 Jul 16;22(3):e220015. doi: 10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v22.0015. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Free Energy Calculations by the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area Method.通过分子力学泊松-玻尔兹曼表面积法进行自由能计算。
Mol Inform. 2012 Feb;31(2):114-22. doi: 10.1002/minf.201100135. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
2
Evaluating the Accuracy of the Quasiharmonic Approximation.评估准谐近似的准确性。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2005 Sep;1(5):1017-28. doi: 10.1021/ct0500904.
3
Nonpolar Solvation Free Energies of Protein-Ligand Complexes.蛋白质-配体复合物的非极性溶剂化自由能
The Role of Phytosterol Derivatives in Inhibiting LuxS-Mediated Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation in Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
植物甾醇衍生物在抑制副溶血性弧菌中LuxS介导的群体感应和生物膜形成中的作用
Mol Biotechnol. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s12033-025-01509-2.
4
Mechanistic basis of N-terminal domain-mediated allostery in SIRT6: integrating molecular dynamics simulations and biochemical assays.SIRT6中N端结构域介导的变构效应的机制基础:整合分子动力学模拟与生化分析
Mol Divers. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s11030-025-11340-1.
5
Bridged Azobenzene Exhibits Fully Reversible Photocontrolled Binding to a G‑Quadruplex DNA/Duplex Junction.桥连偶氮苯对G-四链体DNA/双链体连接体表现出完全可逆的光控结合。
JACS Au. 2025 Aug 7;5(8):3846-3857. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.5c00532. eCollection 2025 Aug 25.
6
Molecular Fingerprint of Cold Adaptation in Antarctic Icefish PepT1 (): A Comparative Molecular Dynamics Study.南极冰鱼PepT1冷适应的分子指纹:一项比较分子动力学研究
Biomolecules. 2025 Jul 22;15(8):1058. doi: 10.3390/biom15081058.
7
Structural and functional insights into the selective inhibition of mutant tau aggregation by purpurin and oleocanthal in frontotemporal dementia.紫红素和油橄榄苦素对额颞叶痴呆中突变型tau蛋白聚集的选择性抑制作用的结构与功能见解
Protein Sci. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70240. doi: 10.1002/pro.70240.
8
In-silico evaluation of putative maternal semiochemicals of pigs with receptor proteins.利用受体蛋白对猪潜在母体信息素进行计算机模拟评估。
Front Mol Biosci. 2025 Aug 8;12:1600209. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1600209. eCollection 2025.
9
Target-aware 3D molecular generation based on guided equivariant diffusion.基于引导等变扩散的目标感知三维分子生成
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 25;16(1):7928. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63245-0.
10
Computational identification of dual COX-1 and NIK inhibitors from marine microalga Chlorella vulgaris.从海洋微藻小球藻中进行环氧化酶-1和NF-κB诱导激酶双重抑制剂的计算鉴定
J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2025 Sep;23(3):100531. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2025.100531. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Nov 9;6(11):3558-68. doi: 10.1021/ct100272s. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
4
Ligand Affinities Estimated by Quantum Chemical Calculations.通过量子化学计算估算的配体亲和力。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 May 11;6(5):1726-37. doi: 10.1021/ct9006986.
5
A Direct Comparison of the MM-GB/SA Scoring Procedure and Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations Using Carbonic Anhydrase as a Test Case: Strengths and Pitfalls of Each Approach.以碳酸酐酶为例对MM-GB/SA评分程序与自由能微扰计算进行直接比较:每种方法的优势与不足
J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Jul 12;7(7):2296-306. doi: 10.1021/ct200244p. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
6
MMPBSA.py: An Efficient Program for End-State Free Energy Calculations.MMPBSA.py:用于终态自由能计算的高效程序。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Sep 11;8(9):3314-21. doi: 10.1021/ct300418h. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
7
Comparison of the Efficiency of the LIE and MM/GBSA Methods to Calculate Ligand-Binding Energies.比较 LIE 和 MM/GBSA 方法计算配体结合能的效率。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Nov 8;7(11):3768-78. doi: 10.1021/ct200163c. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
8
Modeling Local Structural Rearrangements Using FEP/REST: Application to Relative Binding Affinity Predictions of CDK2 Inhibitors.使用FEP/REST对局部结构重排进行建模:在CDK2抑制剂相对结合亲和力预测中的应用
J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Feb 12;9(2):1282-93. doi: 10.1021/ct300911a. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
Binding Free Energy Calculations for Lead Optimization: Assessment of Their Accuracy in an Industrial Drug Design Context.用于先导化合物优化的结合自由能计算:在工业药物设计背景下对其准确性的评估
J Chem Theory Comput. 2014 Aug 12;10(8):3331-44. doi: 10.1021/ct5000296. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
10
A large-scale test of free-energy simulation estimates of protein-ligand binding affinities.一种大规模测试自由能模拟估计蛋白质-配体结合亲和力的方法。
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Oct 27;54(10):2794-806. doi: 10.1021/ci5004027. Epub 2014 Oct 14.