• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

众包健康研究:公共卫生研究生态系统中临床试验的重要新兴补充。

Crowdsourced health research studies: an important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem.

作者信息

Swan Melanie

机构信息

MS Futures Group, Palo Alto, CA 94306, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2012 Mar 7;14(2):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1988.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.1988
PMID:22397809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3376509/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Crowdsourced health research studies are the nexus of three contemporary trends: 1) citizen science (non-professionally trained individuals conducting science-related activities); 2) crowdsourcing (use of web-based technologies to recruit project participants); and 3) medicine 2.0 / health 2.0 (active participation of individuals in their health care particularly using web 2.0 technologies). Crowdsourced health research studies have arisen as a natural extension of the activities of health social networks (online health interest communities), and can be researcher-organized or participant-organized. In the last few years, professional researchers have been crowdsourcing cohorts from health social networks for the conduct of traditional studies. Participants have also begun to organize their own research studies through health social networks and health collaboration communities created especially for the purpose of self-experimentation and the investigation of health-related concerns.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this analysis is to undertake a comprehensive narrative review of crowdsourced health research studies. This review will assess the status, impact, and prospects of crowdsourced health research studies.

METHODS

Crowdsourced health research studies were identified through a search of literature published from 2000 to 2011 and informal interviews conducted 2008-2011. Keyword terms related to crowdsourcing were sought in Medline/PubMed. Papers that presented results from human health studies that included crowdsourced populations were selected for inclusion. Crowdsourced health research studies not published in the scientific literature were identified by attending industry conferences and events, interviewing attendees, and reviewing related websites.

RESULTS

Participatory health is a growing area with individuals using health social networks, crowdsourced studies, smartphone health applications, and personal health records to achieve positive outcomes for a variety of health conditions. PatientsLikeMe and 23andMe are the leading operators of researcher-organized, crowdsourced health research studies. These operators have published findings in the areas of disease research, drug response, user experience in crowdsourced studies, and genetic association. Quantified Self, Genomera, and DIYgenomics are communities of participant-organized health research studies where individuals conduct self-experimentation and group studies. Crowdsourced health research studies have a diversity of intended outcomes and levels of scientific rigor.

CONCLUSIONS

Participatory health initiatives are becoming part of the public health ecosystem and their rapid growth is facilitated by Internet and social networking influences. Large-scale parameter-stratified cohorts have potential to facilitate a next-generation understanding of disease and drug response. Not only is the large size of crowdsourced cohorts an asset to medical discovery, too is the near-immediate speed at which medical findings might be tested and applied. Participatory health initiatives are expanding the scope of medicine from a traditional focus on disease cure to a personalized preventive approach. Crowdsourced health research studies are a promising complement and extension to traditional clinical trials as a model for the conduct of health research.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e60/3376509/18e76319cc00/jmir_v14i2e46_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e60/3376509/18e76319cc00/jmir_v14i2e46_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e60/3376509/18e76319cc00/jmir_v14i2e46_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

众包健康研究是三种当代趋势的交汇点:1)公民科学(未经专业训练的个人开展与科学相关的活动);2)众包(利用基于网络的技术招募项目参与者);3)医学2.0/健康2.0(个人积极参与自身医疗保健,特别是使用网络2.0技术)。众包健康研究作为健康社交网络(在线健康兴趣社区)活动的自然延伸而兴起,可以是研究者组织的,也可以是参与者组织的。在过去几年中,专业研究人员一直在从健康社交网络中众包队列以进行传统研究。参与者也开始通过健康社交网络以及专门为自我实验和调查健康相关问题而创建的健康协作社区来组织自己的研究。

目的

本分析的目的是对众包健康研究进行全面的叙述性综述。该综述将评估众包健康研究的现状、影响和前景。

方法

通过搜索2000年至2011年发表的文献以及在2008 - 2011年进行的非正式访谈来确定众包健康研究。在Medline/PubMed中搜索与众包相关的关键词。选择那些呈现包括众包人群的人类健康研究结果的论文纳入。通过参加行业会议和活动、采访参会者以及审查相关网站来确定未发表在科学文献中的众包健康研究。

结果

参与式健康是一个不断发展的领域,个人利用健康社交网络、众包研究、智能手机健康应用程序和个人健康记录来实现各种健康状况的积极成果。PatientsLikeMe和23andMe是研究者组织的众包健康研究的主要运营者。这些运营者在疾病研究、药物反应、众包研究中的用户体验以及基因关联等领域发表了研究结果。量化自我、Genomera和DIYgenomics是参与者组织的健康研究社区,个人在其中进行自我实验和小组研究。众包健康研究有多种预期结果和科学严谨程度。

结论

参与式健康倡议正成为公共卫生生态系统的一部分,互联网和社交网络的影响促进了其快速发展。大规模参数分层队列有可能促进对疾病和药物反应的下一代理解。众包队列的庞大规模不仅是医学发现的一项资产,医学研究结果得以测试和应用的近乎即时的速度也是如此。参与式健康倡议正在将医学的范围从传统的疾病治疗重点扩展到个性化预防方法。众包健康研究作为健康研究开展的一种模式,是对传统临床试验的一种有前途的补充和扩展。

相似文献

1
Crowdsourced health research studies: an important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem.众包健康研究:公共卫生研究生态系统中临床试验的重要新兴补充。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Mar 7;14(2):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1988.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Scaling crowdsourced health studies: the emergence of a new form of contract research organization.扩大众包健康研究规模:一种新型合同研究组织的兴起。
Per Med. 2012 Mar;9(2):223-234. doi: 10.2217/pme.11.97.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Globalizing and crowdsourcing biomedical research.全球化与众包生物医学研究
Br Med Bull. 2016 Dec;120(1):27-33. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw044. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
6
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
7
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.
8
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.
9
Factors Influencing Doctors' Participation in the Provision of Medical Services Through Crowdsourced Health Care Information Websites: Elaboration-Likelihood Perspective Study.影响医生通过众包医疗信息网站参与医疗服务提供的因素:详尽可能性视角研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jun 29;8(6):e16704. doi: 10.2196/16704.
10
Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: trends, OGC standards and application examples.众包、公民感知和传感器网络技术在公共和环境健康监测及危机管理中的应用:趋势、OGC 标准和应用实例。
Int J Health Geogr. 2011 Dec 21;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-10-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Crowdsourcing strategies to improve access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Australia, the Philippines, Thailand and China.澳大利亚、菲律宾、泰国和中国提高获得艾滋病毒暴露前预防服务机会的众包策略。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 14;25(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11065-4.
2
Integrating Digital Health Innovations to Achieve Universal Health Coverage: Promoting Health Outcomes and Quality Through Global Public Health Equity.整合数字健康创新以实现全民健康覆盖:通过全球公共卫生公平促进健康成果和质量。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 5;13(9):1060. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091060.
3
The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Scaling crowdsourced health studies: the emergence of a new form of contract research organization.扩大众包健康研究规模:一种新型合同研究组织的兴起。
Per Med. 2012 Mar;9(2):223-234. doi: 10.2217/pme.11.97.
2
The promise of mHealth: daily activity monitoring and outcome assessments by wearable sensors.移动医疗的前景:可穿戴传感器的日常活动监测和结果评估。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(9):788-98. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425908.
3
Smart phone, smart science: how the use of smartphones can revolutionize research in cognitive science.
开放科学的学术影响:一项范围综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 5;12(3):241248. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241248. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Participant Contributions to Person-Generated Health Data Research Using Mobile Devices: Scoping Review.参与者对使用移动设备进行的个人生成健康数据研究的贡献:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 20;27:e51955. doi: 10.2196/51955.
5
"Crying in the Wilderness"-The Use of Web-Based Support in Telomere Biology Disorders: Thematic Analysis.《荒野中的哭泣》——基于网络的支持在端粒生物学紊乱中的应用:主题分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 16;8:e64343. doi: 10.2196/64343.
6
Contrasting the Expectations and Experiences Related to Mobile Health Use for Chronic Pain: Questionnaire Study.对比慢性疼痛移动健康应用的期望与体验:问卷调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 6;9(3):e38265. doi: 10.2196/38265.
7
Attitudes and Beliefs of Patients With Left-Ventricular Assist Devices Toward COVID-19 Vaccination and Willingness to Seek Care During the Pandemic.接受左心室辅助装置的患者对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度和信念,以及在大流行期间寻求医疗的意愿。
Perm J. 2022 Jun 29;26(2):64-68. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.207. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
8
Success Factors of Medical Crowdfunding Campaigns: Systematic Review.医疗众筹活动的成功因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 22;24(3):e30189. doi: 10.2196/30189.
9
JTrack: A Digital Biomarker Platform for Remote Monitoring of Daily-Life Behaviour in Health and Disease.JTrack:用于健康和疾病的日常生活行为远程监测的数字生物标志物平台。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;9:763621. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.763621. eCollection 2021.
10
Investigating the Use of Digital Health Technology to Monitor COVID-19 and Its Effects: Protocol for an Observational Study (Covid Collab Study).调查使用数字健康技术监测2019冠状病毒病及其影响:一项观察性研究方案(Covid Collab研究)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 8;10(12):e32587. doi: 10.2196/32587.
智能手机,智慧科学:智能手机的使用如何彻底改变认知科学研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024974. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
4
Validation of an automated wireless system to monitor sleep in healthy adults.验证一种用于监测健康成年人睡眠的自动化无线系统。
J Sleep Res. 2012 Apr;21(2):221-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00944.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
5
Efficient replication of over 180 genetic associations with self-reported medical data.利用自我报告的医疗数据高效复制超过 180 项遗传关联。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023473. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
6
Web-based genome-wide association study identifies two novel loci and a substantial genetic component for Parkinson's disease.基于网络的全基因组关联研究鉴定出两个新的帕金森病发病位点和大量遗传因素。
PLoS Genet. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002141. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
7
Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm.利用在线自我报告的患者数据和患者匹配算法加速临床发现。
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May;29(5):411-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1837. Epub 2011 Apr 24.
8
The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research.众包在调查研究中的可行性。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):800-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0.
9
Lee Hood.李·胡德
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Mar;29(3):191. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1809.
10
Use of an online community to develop patient-reported outcome instruments: the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MS-TAQ).利用在线社区开发患者报告结局工具:多发性硬化症治疗依从性问卷(MS-TAQ)。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 24;13(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1687.