Research Platform Characterisation of Drug Delivery, Systems on Skin and Investigation of Involved Mechanisms, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2012;25(3):142-9. doi: 10.1159/000336787. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
Optical methods of corneocyte quantification during tape stripping experiments on the skin are useful tools for the rapid evaluation of the skin penetration potential of dermally applied substances. However, a comparative investigation of the different methods proposed for this task, namely NIR densitometry and UV/Vis spectroscopy, is still missing. Thus, the aim of the present work was to employ these two techniques in comparative tape stripping experiments both in vivo on human forearm skin and in vitro on porcine ear skin. Standard tape stripping experiments were performed in the absence and presence of a marketed formulation containing flufenamic acid as a model drug. In the context of these methodological investigations, different methods of skin cleaning prior to the tape stripping procedure were evaluated to identify the most appropriate working protocol among the approaches proposed in the respective literature. The results showed that the investigated methods of NIR densitometry and UV/Vis spectroscopy deliver highly comparable results. Both optical methods are suitable to determine the skin penetration profiles of active substances during in vivo and in vitro tape stripping, especially if a simple working protocol without any cleaning procedures is maintained.
在皮肤胶带剥离实验中,用于定量角质细胞的光学方法是快速评估经皮应用物质透皮潜力的有用工具。然而,对于为完成这一任务而提出的不同方法(即近红外密度测定法和 UV/Vis 光谱法),仍然缺乏比较研究。因此,本工作的目的是在体内人体前臂皮肤和体外猪耳朵皮肤的比较胶带剥离实验中,使用这两种技术。在不存在和存在含有作为模型药物的氟芬那酸的市售制剂的情况下进行标准胶带剥离实验。在这些方法学研究的背景下,评估了胶带剥离程序之前的皮肤清洁的不同方法,以确定在各自文献中提出的方法中最合适的工作方案。结果表明,所研究的近红外密度测定法和 UV/Vis 光谱法提供了高度可比的结果。这两种光学方法都适合于在体内和体外胶带剥离过程中确定活性物质的皮肤渗透分布,如果保持没有任何清洁程序的简单工作方案,则尤其如此。