• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用焦点小组增强国家肥胖护理综合医疗标准实施的地方共识过程。

A local consensus process making use of focus groups to enhance the implementation of a national integrated health care standard on obesity care.

机构信息

Research Centre for the Prevention of Overweight, VU University Amsterdam/Windesheim University of Applied Sciences Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29 Suppl 1:i177-i184. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr072.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmr072
PMID:22399550
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines on obesity management promote integrated care. There is little knowledge about local opportunities and barriers, faced by health care professionals and patients, that affect implementation of an integrated national health care standard in a local setting. Our aim is to understand experiences and expectations of health care professionals and patients as part of the local implementation process.

METHODS

Eight focus groups and two interviews have been conducted among 24 patients (60+) and 29 professionals from seven different care disciplines.

RESULTS

Both patients and professionals have identified serious barriers to implement the national standard: older adults do not feel taken seriously and experience lacking support from professionals. Professionals give contradictory advice and recommendations do not match needs of older adults. Professionals actually feel reluctant to discuss weight-related topics due to several reasons: they do not consider obesity being a chronic disease, lack of qualifications to support self-management and perceived lack of awareness and motivation among patients.

CONCLUSION

Focus groups have proven their value to ascertain the opportunities and barriers older adults and professionals foresee while improving obesity care in order to meet the standards as required in a national guideline. Our research provides an emerging picture of health care professionals and patients having contradictory views and expectations about 'the others' role and their notions on the capability to intervene on patient's weight problems. Without this emerging picture, we would have missed important information on barriers to overcome. The likelihood of successful implementation would then have been small.

摘要

背景

最近关于肥胖管理的指南提倡综合护理。对于影响在当地环境中实施国家综合卫生保健标准的卫生保健专业人员和患者所面临的当地机会和障碍,我们知之甚少。我们的目的是了解卫生保健专业人员和患者的经验和期望,这是当地实施过程的一部分。

方法

在七个不同护理学科中,对 24 名 60 岁以上的患者和 29 名专业人员进行了 8 次焦点小组和 2 次访谈。

结果

患者和专业人员都发现实施国家标准存在严重障碍:老年人感觉没有受到重视,缺乏专业人员的支持。专业人员提供相互矛盾的建议,建议与老年人的需求不匹配。由于多种原因,专业人员实际上不愿意讨论与体重相关的话题:他们不认为肥胖是一种慢性病,缺乏支持自我管理的资格,并且认为患者缺乏意识和动力。

结论

焦点小组证明了它们的价值,有助于确定老年人和专业人员在改善肥胖护理方面预见的机会和障碍,以满足国家指南要求的标准。我们的研究提供了一幅关于卫生保健专业人员和患者对“他人”角色的看法和期望以及他们对干预患者体重问题能力的看法存在矛盾的新兴图景。如果没有这个新兴的图景,我们就会错过克服障碍的重要信息。成功实施的可能性就会很小。

相似文献

1
A local consensus process making use of focus groups to enhance the implementation of a national integrated health care standard on obesity care.利用焦点小组增强国家肥胖护理综合医疗标准实施的地方共识过程。
Fam Pract. 2012 Apr;29 Suppl 1:i177-i184. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr072.
2
The local implementation of a chronic disease management model for childhood overweight and obesity.本地化实施儿童超重和肥胖慢性病管理模式。
Obes Facts. 2012;5(5):766-75. doi: 10.1159/000345156. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
3
Improving the management of obesity in adults: a pilot of a method to identify important barriers to change and tailor interventions to address them.改善成人肥胖管理:一种识别改变的重要障碍并量身定制干预措施以解决这些障碍的方法的试点。
Qual Prim Care. 2013;21(4):237-46.
4
Management of child and adolescent obesity: attitudes, barriers, skills, and training needs among health care professionals.儿童及青少年肥胖的管理:医疗保健专业人员的态度、障碍、技能及培训需求
Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 2):210-4.
5
Primary health care professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework in practice.基层医疗保健专业人员对渥太华决策支持框架在实际应用中的障碍和促进因素的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):380-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.011. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
6
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
7
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
8
Fathers and the well-child visit.父亲与健康儿童检查
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e637-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1612.
9
Identifying service needs from the users and service providers' perspective: a focus group study of Chinese elders, health and social care professionals.从用户和服务提供者的角度识别服务需求:一项针对中国老年人、卫生和社会保健专业人员的焦点小组研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Dec;20(23-24):3463-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03702.x.
10
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

引用本文的文献

1
The renewed Development Model for Integrated Care: a systematic review and model update.综合照护的更新发展模式:系统评价与模式更新
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12610-2.
2
Utilisation of the health belief model to study the behavioural intentions relating to obesity management among university students: a cross-sectional study.运用健康信念模型研究大学生肥胖管理行为意向:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 3;14(5):e079783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079783.
3
Dutch GPs' perspectives on addressing obesity: a qualitative study.
荷兰全科医生对解决肥胖问题的看法:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0112. Print 2024 Apr.
4
Factors that influence the implementation of (inter)nationally endorsed health and social care standards: a systematic review and meta-summary.影响(国际)认可的健康和社会保健标准实施的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Dec;32(12):750-762. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015287. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
Established and Novel Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmission Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Modified Delphi and Focus Group Study to Identify Clinically Important Predictors.全膝关节置换术后30天再入院的既定风险因素和新风险因素:一项用于识别临床重要预测因素的改良德尔菲法和焦点小组研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 17;12(3):747. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030747.
6
The Use of Effective Language and Communication in the Management of Obesity: the Challenge for Healthcare Professionals.有效语言和沟通在肥胖管理中的应用:医疗保健专业人员面临的挑战。
Curr Obes Rep. 2021 Sep;10(3):274-281. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00441-1. Epub 2021 May 18.
7
Older people living at home: experiences of healthy ageing.居家老年人:健康老龄化的体验。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Mar 4;22:e6. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000049.
8
A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies exploring GPs' and nurses' perspectives on discussing weight with patients with overweight and obesity in primary care.一项系统评价和定性研究的主题综合,探索全科医生和护士在初级保健中与超重和肥胖患者讨论体重的观点。
Obes Rev. 2021 Apr;22(4):e13151. doi: 10.1111/obr.13151. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
9
Patient perceptions and understanding of obesity related endometrial cancer.患者对肥胖相关子宫内膜癌的认知与理解。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2020 Jan 31;32:100545. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2020.100545. eCollection 2020 May.
10
What does integrated care mean from an older person's perspective? A scoping review.从老年人的角度来看,综合关怀是什么?一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 22;10(1):e035157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035157.