Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2012 Mar;15(3):334-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0234.
Little is known about how often physicians are formally accused of hastening patient deaths while practicing palliative care.
We conducted an Internet-based survey on a random 50% sample of physician-members of a national hospice and palliative medicine society.
The final sample consisted of 663 physicians (response rate 53%). Over half of the respondents had had at least one experience in the last 5 years in which a patient's family, another physician, or another health care professional had characterized palliative treatments as being euthanasia, murder, or killing. One in four stated that at least one friend or family member, or a patient had similarly characterized their treatments. Respondents rated palliative sedation and stopping artificial hydration/nutrition as treatments most likely to be misconstrued as euthanasia. Overall, 25 physicians (4%) had been formally investigated for hastening a patient's death when that had not been their intention-13 while using opiates for symptom relief and six for using medications while discontinuing mechanical ventilation. In eight (32%) cases, another member of the health care team had initiated the charges. At the time of the survey, none had been found guilty, but they reported experiencing substantial anger and worry.
Commonly used palliative care practices continue to be misconstrued as euthanasia or murder, despite this not being the intention of the treating physician. Further efforts are needed to explain to the health care community and the public that treatments often used to relieve patient suffering at the end of life are ethical and legal.
在姑息治疗实践中,医生因加速患者死亡而被正式指控的频率尚不清楚。
我们对一家全国临终关怀和姑息医学协会的随机抽取的 50%的医师会员进行了基于互联网的调查。
最终样本由 663 名医生组成(应答率为 53%)。超过一半的受访者在过去 5 年内至少有一次经历,患者的家属、其他医生或其他医疗保健专业人员将姑息治疗描述为安乐死、谋杀或杀害。四分之一的人表示,至少有一个朋友或家人或患者也曾将他们的治疗描述为安乐死。受访者将姑息性镇静和停止人工水合/营养治疗评为最有可能被误解为安乐死的治疗方法。总体而言,有 25 名医生(4%)因意图加速患者死亡而受到正式调查——13 名医生因使用阿片类药物缓解症状,6 名医生因停止使用机械通气而使用药物。在 8 个案例中(32%),是医疗团队的另一名成员提出了这些指控。在调查时,他们均未被判有罪,但他们报告说经历了极大的愤怒和担忧。
尽管姑息治疗的意图并非如此,但常用的姑息治疗方法仍被误解为安乐死或谋杀。需要进一步努力向医疗保健界和公众解释,临终时经常用于减轻患者痛苦的治疗方法是合乎道德和法律的。